Sphingius barkudensis Gravely, 1931

Sankaran, Pradeep M. & Caleb, John T. D., 2021, On the taxonomic validity of Indian ground spiders: V. Genera Megamyrmaekion Reuss, 1834, Sosticus Chamberlin, 1922 and Gaviphosa gen. nov. (Araneae: Gnaphosidae), Zootaxa 5040 (4), pp. 539-564 : 554

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5040.4.5

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:310C2BAC-958A-4F78-BF7C-5D60946721B2

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1B3187DA-FFB4-FFA9-3FC9-FCDAFE1AF92D

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Sphingius barkudensis Gravely, 1931
status

 

Sphingius barkudensis Gravely, 1931 View in CoL

Figs 59–68 View FIGURES 59–68

Sphingius barkudensis Gravely, 1931: 271 View in CoL , fig. 19G–H (♂ ♀). Majumder & Tikader, 1991: 152, figs 320–325 (♂ ♀) (for com- plete list of references, see World Spider Catalog (2021)).

Sosticus jabalpurensis Bhandari & Gajbe, 2001: 89 , figs 7–11 (♀). Gajbe, 2004: 89, figs 99–103 (♀). New synonymy

Sosticus sundargarhensis Gajbe, 1979: 72 , fig. 1A–E (♀). Tikader, 1982: 438, figs 310–314 (♀). New synonymy

Type material. S. jabalpurensis . Holotype ♀ from INDIA : Madhya Pradesh: Jabalpur: Tilwara Ghat (23°06’23’’N, 79°52’44’’E), 383 m alt., Pawan Gajbe leg., 22.VIII.1998, NZC-ZSI, Kolkata (5519/18), not examined (the original illustrations of the epigyne ( Bhandari & Gajbe 2001: figs 10–11) are diagnostic and were used for comparison). S. sundargarhensis . Holotype ♀ from INDIA : Odisha (= Orissa): Sundergarh: Bonaigarh (21°48’36’’N, 84°57’23’’E), 154 m alt., D.P. Sanyal leg., 15. VI. 1972, NZC-ZSI, Kolkata (4320/18), examined. Paratypes: 1 ♀ from INDIA : Odisha: Ganjam: Chilika Lake (=Chilka Lake): Barkuda Island (19°33’12.7’’N, 85°08’47.2’’E), 13 m alt., F.H. Gravely leg., 20.VII.1916, repository NZC-ZSI, Kolkata (4321/18), examined. 1 ♀ from INDIA : Mizoram: Bungt- lang Aizawl (not Bhungtilang Aigal) (formerly part of Assam), T.G. Vazirani leg., 22.X.1960, NZC-ZSI, Kolkata (4322/18), examined.

Justification of the synonymy of S. jabalpurensis . Even though we could not examine its type specimen, the original figures of this species share the features of S. barkudensis : epigyne with a single anterior hood and high epigynal plate and vulva with short copulatory ducts and globular spermathecae (compare Bhandari & Gajbe 2001: figs 10–11 with Sankaran et al. 2020: figs 2D–F, 3J–K, 4C–D). Based on these observations, we propose to consider S. jabalpurensis as a junior synonym of S. barkudensis .

Justification of the synonymy of S. sundargarhensis . Examination of the types of this species shows that it has all of the diagnostic features of S. barkudensis as in the case of previous species (compare Figs 62–65 View FIGURES 59–68 with Sankaran et al. 2020: figs 2D–F, 3J–K, 4C–D). Based on these observations, we propose to consider S. sundargarhensis as a junior synonym of S. barkudensis .

Remarks. We were unable to trace out the type of S. jabalpurensis in the arachnid collection of ZSI, even though the authors mentioned that the type would be deposited there ( Bhandari & Gajbe 2001). The ZSI collection has three glass tubes with ‘ S. sundargarhensis ’. A tube labeled as ‘holotype’ (4320/18) contains a female specimen in fairly good condition, with broken legs. The same tube has a micro-vial containing the dissected epigyne. A second tube labeled as ‘paratype’ (4321/18) contains a female specimen in fairly good condition, with broken legs and intact epigyne. A third tube also labeled as ‘paratype’ (4322/18) contains a female specimen in fairly good condition, with broken legs and intact epigyne. In the original description ( Gajbe 1979), the figure numbers for ‘ S. sundargarhensis ’ are misplaced with that of Sosticus nainitalensis Gajbe, 1979 . The epigyne of the holotype of this species matches with the original illustrations numbered as ‘1C–D’ and that of S. nainitalensis matches with the illustrations numbered as ‘2C–D’ (compare Figs 62–65 View FIGURES 59–68 and Figs 87–88 View FIGURES 84–89 with Gajbe 1979: figs 1C–D and 2C–D respectively), indicating that Gajbe (1979) carelessly provided the figure numbers to support species descriptions that are totally misleading.

VI

Mykotektet, National Veterinary Institute

T

Tavera, Department of Geology and Geophysics

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Liocranidae

Genus

Sphingius

Loc

Sphingius barkudensis Gravely, 1931

Sankaran, Pradeep M. & Caleb, John T. D. 2021
2021
Loc

Sosticus jabalpurensis

Gajbe, P. U. 2004: 89
Bhandari, R. & Gajbe, P. 2001: 89
2001
Loc

Sosticus sundargarhensis

Tikader, B. K. 1982: 438
Gajbe, U. A. 1979: 72
1979
Loc

Sphingius barkudensis

Majumder, S. C. & Tikader, B. K. 1991: 152
Gravely, F. H. 1931: 271
1931
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF