Oryzomys nitidus Thomas 1884
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7316535 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11325521 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/19BC550D-1FD6-EEB0-1BA6-0E33FDB8C974 |
treatment provided by |
Guido (2022-12-13 04:19:03, last updated 2024-11-29 04:44:57) |
scientific name |
Oryzomys nitidus Thomas 1884 |
status |
|
Oryzomys nitidus Thomas 1884 View in CoL
Oryzomys nitidus Thomas 1884 View in CoL , Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1884: 452.
Type Locality: Perú, Junín Dept., valley of Río Tulumayo, 10 km S San Ramón, Amable Maria, 2000 ft (as located by Gardner and Patton, 1976:42).
Vernacular Names: Elegant Oryzomys.
Synonyms: Oryzomys boliviae Thomas 1901 .
Distribution: Lowland rain forest and Andean foothills, 50-1985 m, of E Perú, E Bolivia, and WC Brazil (Acre and Mato Grosso) (See Musser et al., 1998:Fig. 79; Patton et al., 2000).
Conservation: IUCN – Lower Risk (lc).
Discussion: A species formerly included in O. capito (= O. megacephalus ) by Cabrera (1961) or affiliated with O. alfaroi by Hershkovitz (1966 c). Gardner and Patton (1976) provided karyotypic and morphological evidence justifying the specific distinction of O. nitidus from both and listed boliviae , intermedius , and legatus as likely synonyms. Distribution, synonymy, and morphological recognition clarified by Musser et al. (1998), who arrayed O. nitidus with O. emmonsae , O. macconnelli , and O. russatus as a species group; their monophyletic association is generally supported by cytochrome b data but cladistic details differ depending on the study ( Bonvicino and Martins Moreira, 2001; Patton et al., 2000). Detailed karyotypic comparisons of O. nitidus with other nitidus group species presented by Silva et al. (2000); limited resemblance of homologous chromosomal bands indicates that O. nitidus is distantly related to the O. megacephalus O. yunganus assemblage ( Volobouev and Aniskin, 2000).
Bonvicino, C. R., and M. A. Martins Moreira. 2001. Molecular phylogeny of the genus Oryzomys (Rodentia, Sigmodontinae) based on cytochrome b DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 18: 282 - 292.
Gardner, A. L., and J. L. Patton. 1976. Karyotypic variation in oryzomyine rodents (Cricetinae) with comments on chromosomal evolution in the Neotropical cricetine complex. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology, Louisiana State University, 49: 1 - 48.
Hershkovitz, P. 1966 c. South American swamp and fossorial rats of the scapteromyine group (Cricetinae, Muridae), with comments on the glans penis in murid taxonomy. Zeitschrift fur Saugetierkunde, 31: 81 - 149.
Patton, J. L., M. N. F. da Silva, and J. R. Malcolm. 2000. Mammals of the Rio Jurua and the evolutionary and ecological diversification of Amazonia. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 244: 1 - 306.
Silva, M. J. J., A. R. Percequillo, and Y. Yonenaga-Yassuda. 2000. Cytogenetics and systematic approach on a new Oryzomys species of the nitidus group (Sigmodontinae, Rodentia) from northeastern Brazil. Caryologica, 53: 219 - 226.
Volobouev, V. T., and V. M. Aniskin. 2000. Comparative chromosome banding analysis of three South American species of rice rats of the genus Oryzomys (Rodentia, Sigmodontinae). Chromosome Research, 8: 295 - 304.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.