Euthalia phemius, (DOUBLEDAY, 1848)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2011.00772.x |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/194CAF38-FF90-B043-70FC-FCFDFB63FEF9 |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Euthalia phemius |
status |
|
SSP. PHEMIUS ( DOUBLEDAY, 1848) View in CoL
Distribution: Bangladesh, Nepal, north India (including Sikkim, Assam), Bhutan, Myanmar, west Malaysia, Langkawi, Thailand [including Tarutao Island and Samui Island (new record)], Laos, Vietnam, south and south-west China (including Hong Kong and Hainan Island).
Itanus phemius Doubleday, 1848 : pl. 41, fig. 4. Syntype ♂, type locality: Silhet , Bangladesh (NHM).
Adolias phemius: Westwood, 1850: 291 ; Moore, 1858: 187 (1♂, Darjeeling); Moore, 1859: 65, pl. 3, fig. 3 [partim: ♂, phemius , ♀, phemius nec. Doubleday = Euthalia alpheda ( Godart, 1824) View in CoL ]; Moore, 1866: 766.
Adolias sancara Moore, 1858: 195 . syn. nov. Syntypes 2♀ (1♀ as 1♂ in the original description), type localities: north India and Darjeeling (NHM); Moore, 1859: 78, pl. 9, fig. 1 (♀); Butler, 1869: 602 (1♂ 1♀, north India and China).
Adolias (Itanus) phemius: Felder, 1861: 34 .
Adolias hesperus [nec. Papilio hesperus Fabricius, 1793 View in CoL = Euryphura chalcis (Felder & Felder, 1860) View in CoL ]: Butler, 1869: 604.
Euthalia sancara: Kirby, 1871: 253 View in CoL .
Euthalia phemius: Kirby, 1871: 254 View in CoL ; Staudinger, 1886: 153, pl. 54 (partim: ♂, phemius View in CoL , ♀, phemius View in CoL nec. Doubleday = E. alpheda View in CoL ); de Nicéville, 1886:
·
Figure 20. Linearized neighbour-joining (NJ) tree based on Kimura’s two-parameter model using a combined sequence of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) and NADH dehydrogenase subunit 5 (ND5) genes. Identical sequences were treated as a single operational taxonomic unit (OTU). Numbers indicate bootstrap values from NJ (top left) and maximum parsimony (top right) analyses, and posterior probabilities from Bayesian analysis (bottom). Only bootstrap values> 50% and Bayesian posterior probabilities> 0.50 are shown. The abbreviations of OTUs correspond to those in Table 1. Molecular clocks of 1.1–1.2 ¥ 10 -8 substitutions per site per year for mitochondrial genes were applied for the divergence time estimations ( Brower, 1994). The classifications of Tsukada (1991) and from the present study are shown on the right.
218–219; Swinhoe, 1893: 286; Moore, 1898: 123, pl. 238, figs 1 (♂), 1a (♂), 1b (♀), 1c (♀); Bingham, 1905: 280, fig. 53 (♂); Tytler, 1911: 59; Matsumura, 1919: 573, pl. 44, figs 4 (♀), 5 (♂); Evans, 1924: 904, pl. 19, F.18.17 (1♂ 1♀); Matsumura, 1929 *: 23; Corbet, 1945: 182; Corbet, 1956: 233, pl. 7, fig. 92 (♂ genitalia); Doggett, 1974: 37 (1♂); Eliot, 1978: 200, 202, 437, 541, fig. 99 (♂ genitalia); G. & B. Johnston, 1980: 164 (♂); D’Abrera, 1985: 357–359; Mani, 1986: 134, 136; Wu, 1988: 135, pl. 12, figs 4 (♂), 5 (♀); Koiwaya, 1989: 89, 147, fig. 548; Eliot, 1992: 187, 188, 408, 557, fig. 99 (♂ genitalia), pl. 27, figs 23 (♂), 24 (♀); Igarashi & Fukuda, 1997: 437–438, pl. 198, figs ♂ UP, ♂ UN, ♀ UP, ♀ UN (+larva, pupae, and habitat); Aoyama, 1998: 132, fig. 3 (♂), 133, fig. 5 (♂), 282; Watanabe, 1998: 83, fig. ♀, 148; Chou, 1998: 136, pl. 56, figs 1 (♂), 2 (♂ UN); Nishiyama, 1999: 118, pl. 64 (2♂ 1♀); Bascombe et al., 1999: 15, 54, 55, 344, 345, 382, 391, 392, figs 9.141 (wing venation), 9.142B (♂ genitalia).
Euthalia (Euthalia) phemius: Evans, 1912: 575 View in CoL .
Euthalia phemius phemius: Fruhstorfer, 1913: 674– 675 View in CoL , pl. 131c ( phemius View in CoL ♀); Godfrey, 1930: 293; Corbet, 1945: 179, fig. 6 (♂ genitalia); Fleming, 1974: 60, pl. 1 (♀); Fleming, 1975: 51, pl. 48, N 112♀; Pinratana, 1979: 76, figs N 131♂ (UP), N 131♀ (UP, UN); Fleming, 1983: 53, pl. 48, fig. N 112♀; D’Abrera, 1985: 357, ♂ R, ♂ V, ♀ R; Aoki & Yamaguchi, 1986: 151 (1♂); Motono & Negishi, 1989: 31; Chou, 1994: 487– 488, figs 4♂ UP, 4♂ UN, 4♀ UP, 4♀ UN; Gu & Chen, 1997: 185, figs 185 ♂ (UP, UN), ♀ (UP, UN); Nishiyama, 1999: 207; Ek-Amnuay, 2006: 442–443, pl. 195, fig. N148 (♂ UP, ♂ UN, ♀ UP).
Euthalia phemius seitzi Fruhstorfer, 1913: 675 View in CoL , pl. 131d ( phemius View in CoL ♂), pl. 137d ( seitzi View in CoL U ♀). Syn. nov. Syntypes 1♂ 1♀, type locality: Hong Kong (MNHN); Mell, 1935: 240 (4♂ 1♀); Marsh, 1968: 73, pl. 27, figs 3 (♂), 4 (♀), 5 (♂); G. & B. Johnston, 1980: 189; D’Abrera, 1985: 358; Chou, 1994: 487–488, figs 5♂ UP, 5♂ UN, 5♀ UP, 5♀ UN; Bascombe et al., 1999: 344.
Euthalia phemius ipona Fruhstorfer, 1913: 675 View in CoL . syn. nov. Syntype ♂, type locality: Perak, W. Malaysia (NHM); Pendlebury, 1939: 389–390.
Euthalia phemius View in CoL f. phemius: Dubois & Vitalis de Salvaza, 1924: 43 View in CoL .
Euthalia phemius corbeti Pendlebury, 1939: 389– 390 View in CoL , pl. 6, fig. 15 (♂). Holotype ♂, type locality: Langkawi (NHM) [not found]; Corbet, 1945: 182; Corbet, 1956: 233, 451; Pasteur, 1972: 21 (2♀).
Euthalia ipona: Fleming, 1974: 60 View in CoL , pls 2a (♂), 2b (♀); Fleming, 1975: 51, pl. 48, N 113♂, N 113♀; Eliot, 1978: 200, 202, 437; Pinratana, 1979: 76, figs N 132♀ (UN), N 132♂ (UP), N 132♀ (UP); Fleming, 1983: 53, pl.48, figs N 113♂, N 113♀; D’Abrera, 1985: 358–359, ♂ R; Eliot, 1992: 187–188, 408, pl. 27, figs 21 (♂), 22 (♀); Kato & Raman, 2005: 137 (2♂ 2♀), 269; Ek-Amnuay, 2006: 442–443, pl. 195, fig. N151 (♂ UP, UN, ♂ UN, ♀ UP, UN).
Euthalia (Aconthea) phemius phemius: Pinratana & Eliot, 1996: 78 View in CoL , pl. 53, fig. 143 (♂, ♀).
Euthalia (Aconthea) ipona: Pinratana & Eliot, 1996: 78 View in CoL , pl. 53, fig. 144 (♂, ♀).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Euthalia phemius
Yago, Masaya, Yokochi, Takashi, Kondo, Mariko, Braby, Michael F., Yahya, Bakhtiar, Peggie, Djunijanti, Wang, Min, Williams, Mark, Morita, Sadayuki & Ueshima, Rei 2012 |
Euthalia (Aconthea) phemius phemius:
Pinratana A & Eliot JN 1996: 78 |
Euthalia (Aconthea) ipona:
Pinratana A & Eliot JN 1996: 78 |
Euthalia ipona:
Ek-Amnuay P 2006: 442 |
Kato K & Raman S 2005: 137 |
Eliot JN & Corbet AS & Pendlebury HM 1992: 187 |
D'Abrera B 1985: 358 |
Fleming WA 1983: 53 |
Pinratana A 1979: 76 |
Eliot JN & Corbet AS & Pendlebury HM 1978: 200 |
Fleming WA 1975: 51 |
Fleming WA 1974: 60 |
Euthalia phemius corbeti
Pasteur D 1972: 21 |
Corbet AS 1956: 233 |
Corbet AS 1945: 182 |
Pendlebury HM 1939: 390 |
Euthalia phemius
Dubois E & Vitalis de Salvaza R 1924: 43 |
Euthalia phemius phemius: Fruhstorfer, 1913: 674– 675
Ek-Amnuay P 2006: 442 |
Nishiyama Y & of Laos P 1999: 207 |
Gu M & Chen P 1997: 185 |
Chou I 1994: 487 |
Motono A & Negishi N 1989: 31 |
Aoki T & Yamaguchi S 1986: 151 |
D'Abrera B 1985: 357 |
Fleming WA 1983: 53 |
Pinratana A 1979: 76 |
Fleming WA 1975: 51 |
Fleming WA 1974: 60 |
Corbet AS 1945: 179 |
Godfrey EJ 1930: 293 |
Fruhstorfer H 1913: 675 |
Euthalia phemius seitzi
Bascombe MJ & Johnston G & Bascombe FS 1999: 344 |
Chou I 1994: 487 |
D'Abrera B 1985: 358 |
Johnston G & Johnston B 1980: 189 |
Marsh JCS 1968: 73 |
Mell RE 1935: 240 |
Fruhstorfer H 1913: 675 |
Euthalia phemius ipona
Pendlebury HM 1939: 389 |
Fruhstorfer H 1913: 675 |
Euthalia (Euthalia) phemius: Evans, 1912: 575
Evans WH 1912: 575 |
Euthalia sancara:
Kirby WF 1871: 253 |
Euthalia phemius: Kirby, 1871: 254
Kirby WF 1871: 254 |
Adolias hesperus
Butler AG 1869: 604 |
Adolias (Itanus) phemius:
Felder C 1861: 34 |
Adolias sancara
Butler AG 1869: 602 |
Moore F 1859: 78 |
Moore F 1858: 195 |
Adolias phemius: Westwood, 1850: 291
Moore F 1866: 766 |
Moore F 1859: 65 |
Moore F 1858: 187 |
Westwood JO 1850: 291 |