Xerophytacolus, Stiller, Michael, 2012

Stiller, Michael, 2012, New leafhopper genera and species (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) which feed on Velloziaceae from Southern Africa, with a discussion of their trophobiosis, Zootaxa 3509 (1), pp. 35-54 : 44-46

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3509.1.2

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D0480008-24AD-47DF-93CC-4D5FDFE9042C

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13935678

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/192F0A26-311F-6604-3CBF-FAAFFE2F2899

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Xerophytacolus
status

gen. nov.

Xerophytacolus View in CoL gen.n.

Type species: Xerophytacolus tubuverpus sp.n.

( Figs 12–14 View FIGURES 8 – 14 , 98–122 View FIGURES 98 – 112 View FIGURES 113 – 122 )

Gender masculine

Diagnosis. Coloration distinct, with median yellowish longitudinal stripe flanked laterally by solid fuscous marking extending into tegmina with translucent and yellow cells ( Figs 10–13 View FIGURES 8 – 14 ). Face fuscous with single, narrow yellow submarginal line ( Figs 8 View FIGURES 8 – 14 , 99, 100 View FIGURES 98 – 112 ). Head acutely produced, longer than width between eyes. Male pygofer lobe at apex with median process ( Figs 83, 84 View FIGURES 77 – 87 , 105, 107, 108 View FIGURES 98 – 112 ). Plate generally rectangular, with lateral and medial margins convergent; macrosetae present, apex truncate ( Figs 81 View FIGURES 77 – 87 , 106 View FIGURES 98 – 112 ).

Etymology. Compound word in Latin, Xerophyta , name of the associated plant; suffix - cola, inhabitant.

Male, female and nymph. Colour. Base color fuscous. Dorsum with yellowish median longitudinal stripe, extending into tegmina to claval suture ( Figs 9, 10, 12–14 View FIGURES 8 – 14 ). Face with single, pale yellow transverse submarginal line ( Figs 8 View FIGURES 8 – 14 , 99, 100 View FIGURES 98 – 112 ). Venter fuscous, with some pale yellow spots or markings. Abdomen with yellowish caudal margin on male sternite 8 and female sternites 4–6. Tegmina with cells fuscous or translucent, costal cells with recurved markings; apical cells brown, light brown and some translucent areas; veins dark brown ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 8 – 14 ). Legs with femur black, tibia pale. Nymph dorsally with longitudinal yellowish median bar, somewhat narrowed at wing base and medially on abdomen; laterally fuscous ( Figs 9, 14 View FIGURES 8 – 14 ); abdominal tergites with three pairs of spines; legs pale with femur and tibia with narrow brown bands.

Male, female and nymph. External morphology. Body elongate, vertex acutely angled to face ( Fig. 100 View FIGURES 98 – 112 ). Body glabrous. Vertex in dorsal view acutely produced ( Fig. 98 View FIGURES 98 – 112 ), face shagreened, dorsally with disc smooth. Pronotum lateral margin carinate. Ocellus marginal, close to eye. Hair-like seta on gena close to lateral frontal suture, close to antennal socket ( Fig. 99 View FIGURES 98 – 112 ). Suture between clypeus and clypellus absent or at most weakly developed. Gena very broad, not incised below eye, extended onto dorsum of head and visible behind eye, below lorum not extended beyond clypellus. Tegmina with four apical cells, each of similar size, two anteapical cells (crossvein m-cu2 absent), four recurved veins between costa and outer anteapical cell, some recurved veins arising from outer anteapical cell not attainting costa, with recurved dark markings in basal costal cell not representing veins; claval veins reduced ( Figs 11 View FIGURES 8 – 14 , 101 View FIGURES 98 – 112 ), with two ( Fig. 77 View FIGURES 77 – 87 ) or three ( Fig. 101 View FIGURES 98 – 112 ) closed anteapical cells. Hind wing venation complete, with four apical cells, jugal lobe well developed ( Fig. 102 View FIGURES 98 – 112 ). Profemur setae of anteroventral row with basal setae short, intercalary setae stout, 2–4 times longer than basal setae, AM1 variable, about as long as or slightly longer than intercalary setae. Metafemur dorsoapical setal formula 2+2+1; PD2 setum pale, about ½ shorter than AD1 and PD1, AD3 pale, as long as AD1 and PD1; metatibial setae on row PV with 3 sections of setae, based on length and thickness: basal third short (? as long as greatest width of tibia), medial third longer (½ as long as greatest width of tibia) and distal third with 5–7 slightly longer and thicker setae (½ as long as greatest width of tibia); all setae on rows AV and PD and AD as long as or much longer than greatest width of tibia; PD and AD interspersed with short, robust setae. Tarsomere 1 more than twice as long as tarsomere 2 or 3, plantar surface with two rows of up to 7 macrosetae, apex with spur with seta laterally and 4 spurs with platellae medially. Tarsomere 2 with 2 platellae medially. Protibia setal formula 1+4, metatibia 4+4.

Male. Internal morphology. Abdominal apodemes, with anterior apodeme, in dorsal view with membranous lobe elongate, about twice long as wide. Tentorium branched symmetrically, Y-shaped, all branches of similar thickness ( Fig. 98 View FIGURES 98 – 112 )

Male. Genitalia. Pygofer lobe shallowly bilobate, membranous, apex with process, arising marginally or from inner margin ( Figs 83, 84 View FIGURES 77 – 87 , 107, 108 View FIGURES 98 – 112 ). Anal tube with phragma attached to dorsal apodeme of aedeagus. Pygofer with narrow anterior apodeme ( Figs 78, 83 View FIGURES 77 – 87 , 105, 107 View FIGURES 98 – 112 ). Plate rectangular or somewhat converging, apex truncate ( Figs 81 View FIGURES 77 – 87 , 106 View FIGURES 98 – 112 ), uniseriate macrosetae, marginal at base, medial at apex of row; apex membranous; valve broad. Connective Y-shaped ( Figs 87 View FIGURES 77 – 87 , 111 View FIGURES 98 – 112 ), articulating with aedeagus ( Figs 86, 87 View FIGURES 77 – 87 , 109–111 View FIGURES 98 – 112 ). Style with apophysis acute ( Fig. 82 View FIGURES 77 – 87 ) or blunt ( Fig. 112 View FIGURES 98 – 112 ), preapical lobe acute, medial anterior lobe short, blunt, lateral anterior lobe short. Aedeagal shaft biramous, symmetrical ( Figs 85, 86 View FIGURES 77 – 87 , 109, 110 View FIGURES 98 – 112 ).

Female. Genitalia. Sternite 7 with posterior margin concave or W-shaped ( Figs 88 View FIGURES 88 – 97 , 113 View FIGURES 113 – 122 ). Valvula 3 with up to 10 marginal macrosetae ( Figs 89 View FIGURES 88 – 97 , 114 View FIGURES 113 – 122 ). Valvula 2 apical half serrate, medially slightly narrowed ( Figs 97 View FIGURES 88 – 97 , 122 View FIGURES 113 – 122 ), fine denticulation on irregular, crescent-shaped ridges ( Figs 94–96 View FIGURES 88 – 97 , 119–121 View FIGURES 113 – 122 ). Valvula 1 lanceolate ( Figs 90 View FIGURES 88 – 97 , 116 View FIGURES 113 – 122 ) with fine circular microsculpture apically ( Figs 91, 93 View FIGURES 88 – 97 , 115, 117 View FIGURES 113 – 122 ) and rectangular basally ( Figs 92 View FIGURES 88 – 97 , 118 View FIGURES 113 – 122 ).

Relationships. Xerophytacolus is assigned to Opsiini , based on the biramous aedeagal shaft, connective articulated with the aedeagus and the pygofer lobe process. These three features are present in Circulifer Zachvatkin and Opsius Fieber , the latter both with a pygofer process, and in Hishimonus Ishihara and Libengaia Linnavuori but without the pygofer process. Unusual in Xerophytacolus is the sharp margin between the face and vertex, which in most other members of Opsiini is distinctly rounded, but present in Eremophlepsius Zachvatkin from the Palaearctic Region.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hemiptera

Family

Cicadellidae

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF