Tricrista aethus (Hayward, 1951) Zhang & Cong & Shen & Grishin, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.6392056 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/183DE44C-FFBE-FFC8-AFF9-FF20FB57C537 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Tricrista aethus (Hayward, 1951) |
status |
|
Tricrista aethus (Hayward, 1951) , Tricrista canta ( Evans, 1955) , Tricrista slopa ( Evans, 1955) , Tricrista circellata (Plötz, 1882) , and Tricrista taxes (Godman, 1900) , new combinations
Genomic sequencing reveals that the following species currently placed in Thoon Godman, 1900 (type species Proteides modius Mabille, 1889 ): Cobalus aethus Hayward, 1951 (type locality Bolivia), Thoon canta Evans, 1955 (type locality Colombia), Hesperia circellata Plötz, 1882 (type locality Brazil) and Thoon taxes Godman, 1900 (type locality Panama) are not monophyletic with it and instead are in the same prominent clade with Penicula crista Evans, 1955 , the type species of Tricrista Grishin, 2019 ( Fig. 13 View Figure 13 ) implying Tricrista aethus (Hayward, 1951) , new combination, Tricrista canta ( Evans, 1955) , new combination, Tricrista circellata (Plötz, 1882) , new combination, and Tricrista taxes (Godman, 1900) , new combination. Due to phenotypic similarity to these species, particularly to T. canta , we additionally propose Tricrista slopa ( Evans, 1955) , new combination.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.