Gryllus staccato Weissman & Gray, 2019
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4705.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F534C43A-AB09-4CB3-9B08-FD5BDFD90298 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/182387A8-09D5-FF2B-51F6-FDBF0097F8E9 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Gryllus staccato Weissman & Gray |
status |
sp. nov. |
Gryllus staccato Weissman & Gray , n. sp.
Stutter-Chirping Field Cricket
Figs 170–174 View FIGURE 170 View FIGURE 171 View FIGURE 172 View FIGURE 173 View FIGURE 174 , 183–188 View FIGURE 183 View FIGURE 184 View FIGURE 185 View FIGURE 186 View FIGURE 187 View FIGURE 188 , Table 1 View TABLE 1
‘ Gryllus #15’ in DBW notebooks.
‘G15’ and irregular chirping cricket in Sakaguchi & Gray 2011, Blankers et al. 2016.
‘G. staccato’ in Gray et al. 2016b, Gabel et al. 2016, Hennig et al. 2016.
Distribution. Arizona and adjacent deserts of California, Nevada, Utah, and New Mexico.
Recognition characters and song. Most variable calling song of any US Gryllus . A medium to large sized crick- et with a shiny pronotum generally at low elevations in some of the hottest, driest desert areas of the southwestern US, including most of Arizona (except for the northeast corner). Song loud, unique for New World Gryllus : many individuals produce a highly irregular “stuttered” series of chirps ( Fig. 183 View FIGURE 183 , R 15 View FIGURE 15 -291) with high variability in interchirp interval. Chirps at 25°C with variable p/c (typically 3-9; range 1 to 10), variable CR (typically 120-240; range 100-720) depending on p/c and inter-chirp interval, pulse rate 70-110, dominant frequency 5.25 kHz. Within most populations, 10 to 60% of males sing with a more or less constant number of p/c and uniform inter-chirp interval ( Fig. 184A, R View FIGURE 184 11-124 View FIGURE 11 View FIGURE 12 View FIGURE 13 View FIGURE 14 View FIGURE 15 View FIGURE 16 View FIGURE 17 View FIGURE 18 View FIGURE 19 View FIGURE 20 View FIGURE 21 View FIGURE 22 View FIGURE 23 View FIGURE 24 View FIGURE 25 View FIGURE 26 View FIGURE 27 View FIGURE 28 View FIGURE 29 View FIGURE 30 View FIGURE 31 View FIGURE 32 View FIGURE 33 View FIGURE 34 View FIGURE 35 View FIGURE 36 View FIGURE 37 View FIGURE 38 View FIGURE 39 View FIGURE 40 View FIGURE 41 View FIGURE 42 View FIGURE 43 View FIGURE 44 View FIGURE 45 View FIGURE 46 View FIGURE 47 View FIGURE 48 View FIGURE 49 View FIGURE 50 View FIGURE 51 View FIGURE View FIGURE 53 View FIGURE 54 View FIGURE 55 View FIGURE 56 View FIGURE 57 View FIGURE 58 View FIGURE 59 View FIGURE 60 View FIGURE 61 View FIGURE 62 View FIGURE 63 View FIGURE 64 View FIGURE 65 View FIGURE 66 View FIGURE 67 View FIGURE 68 View FIGURE 69 View FIGURE 70 View FIGURE 71 View FIGURE 72 View FIGURE 73 View FIGURE 74 View FIGURE 75 View FIGURE 76 View FIGURE 77 View FIGURE 78 View FIGURE 79 View FIGURE 80 View FIGURE 81 View FIGURE 82 View FIGURE 83 View FIGURE 84 View FIGURE 85 View FIGURE 86 View FIGURE 87 View FIGURE 88 View FIGURE 89 View FIGURE 90 View FIGURE 91 View FIGURE 92 View FIGURE 93 View FIGURE 94 View FIGURE 95 View FIGURE 96 View FIGURE 97 View FIGURE 98 View FIGURE 99 View FIGURE 100 View FIGURE 101 View FIGURE 102 View FIGURE 103 View FIGURE 104 View FIGURE 105 View FIGURE 106 View FIGURE 107 View FIGURE 108 View FIGURE 109 View FIGURE 110 View FIGURE 111 View FIGURE 112 View FIGURE 113 View FIGURE 114 View FIGURE 115 View FIGURE 116 View FIGURE 117 View FIGURE 118 View FIGURE 119 View FIGURE 120 View FIGURE 121 View FIGURE 122 View FIGURE 123 View FIGURE 124 ) with some males (see Fig 184B, R View FIGURE 184 09-147) singing both regular and irregular segments. Color usually light ( Fig. 186 View FIGURE 186 ) but dark individuals ( Fig. 187 View FIGURE 187 ) known even in summer. If male singing irregular stutter-chirp song, then can be confused with no other US Gryllus . If singing with constant p/c and uniform inter-chirp intervals in the Southwestern US, then only has to be distinguished from G. lineaticeps , G. personatus , and G. multipulsator . From allopatric sister species G. lineaticeps , no overlap in distribution ( Fig. 172 View FIGURE 172 ), DNA ( Fig. 174 View FIGURE 174 ), and pulse rate ( Fig. 173 View FIGURE 173 ). From allopatric sister species G. personatus , which it most closely resembles morphologically and which it geographically broadly overlaps in only north-central Arizona and SW New Mexico (but has been only found microsympatric with G. personatus at Road Forks [S81-38 and S12-104] and Socorro [S07-50], New Mexico), G. staccato is distinguished by a combination of characters ( Table 1 View TABLE 1 , p. 18): more file teeth and more teeth/mm on average, shorter ovipositor relative to body size ( Fig. 185 View FIGURE 185 ), microhabitat different (dirt substrate vs. clay substrate), although both can occur at gas stations that have bright night lights, no overlap in dominant frequency ( Fig. 173 View FIGURE 173 ), irregular pulses/chirp, faster PR and CR, and differences in DNA. Both taxa can have linear head stripes, cream colored areas completely around the eyes frequently extending onto the lower, adjacent half of pronotum, and speckles on face between eyes. G. personatus usually at higher elevations. From G. multipulsator , which it overlaps in distribution in southeastern CA, southern NV, and west-central AZ, the latter has more p/c, slower CR and a hirsute (dull) pronotum and general absence of linear lines on the head.
Holotype. Male ( Fig. 186 View FIGURE 186 ). USA. Arizona, Pima Co., Ajo. 1-viii- 2009. 520m. D.B. Weissman. S09-102, R09- 149, DNA sample G1410. 16S ribosomal RNA gene GenBank accession # MN 136664 View Materials . Body 25.3, HF 12.88, LC 13.09. Right tegmen removed: 149 teeth, file length 3.45, TL 14.8, TW 4.6. Type deposited in CAS, Entomology Type #19271.
Paratypes. (Total: 132♂ 109♀) Arizona. Cochise Co., Benson, 1240 m, 27-vi-2009 (S09-54) 1♂ . Wilcox Playa , 4155’, 29-vii-2015 (S15-104) 32° 11’ 55.5” -109° 52’ 42.4”, 2♂ 1♀ . Coconino Co., Sedona , 4400’, 25-vi-1980 (S80-45) 4♂ ; 15-vi-1990 (S90-49) 1♂ ; 30-vi-1994 (S94-35) 1♂; 12-vi-1996 (S96-61, at airport) 1♀; 15-vi, 2007 (S07-61) 1♂ 5♀. Gila Co., Coolidge Dam, 2400 ’, 30-vii-1981 (S81-43) 2♂. Globe , 3548’, 30-vii-1981 (S81-44) 3♂ . Graham Co., Safford , 2920’: 16-vi-1990 (S90-51) 6♂ 1♀ ; 28-vii-2015 (S15-103) 1♂ 2♀ . 4.5m S Safford , 3180’, 10-vi-2012 (S12-20) 1♀ . Hwy 366 near intersection with Hwy 191, 3333’, 28-vii-2015 (S15-102) 4♂ 2♀ . La Paz Co., Wenden , 550m, 14-ix-2011 (S11-87) 2♂ 2♀ . Maricopa Co., Aguila 2100 ’ 23-vii-1990 (S90-71) 2♂ 2♀. Buckeye , 260m, 18-ix-2011 (S11-102) 5♂ 6♀ . Gila Bend , 220m: 31-vii-1981 (S81-47) 1♂ 4♀; i-viii-2009 (S09-103) 2♂ 2♀; 18-ix-2011 (S11-101) 2♂; 30-vii-2015 (S15-111) 28♂ 23♀. Goodyear , 31-vii-1981 (S81-46) 1♂ . Phoenix , 30-vii-2015 (S15-113) 1♂ 1♀ . Mohave Co., Hwy 68 2m E California border, 1000’, 24-vi-1980 (S80-38) 1♂ . Kingman , 3700’, 2-viii-1992 (S92-113) 3♂ 2♀ ; 16-vi-2007 (S07-68) 1♂ . 3 m SE Kingman on road to Hualapai Mt. Park, 3950’, 3-viii-1991 (S91-67) 5♂ 2♀ . Pima Co., Ajo , 540m, 20-viii-1998 (S98-72 & 74) 7♂ 3♀; 15-v-1999 (S99-26) 1♂ ; 17-ix-2011 (S11-99) 2♂ 1♀; 29-vii-2015 (S15-109) 1♂ 2♀. Catalina , 2940’, 18-viii-1998 (S98-65) 2♂ 10♀ . Robles Junction , 29-vii-2015 (S15-106) 1♀ . Hwy 286 6.3 m S Robles Junction, 1100m, 17-ix-2011 (S11- 95) 2♂ 1♀ . Hwy 86 10.5 m W Hwy 286, 850m, 17-ix-2011 (S11-97) 3♂ 1♀ . Sells , 29-vii-2015 (S15-107) 1♂ 2♀ . Tucson , 930m, 27-vi-2009 (S09-53) 5♂ 2♀ . Saguaro Rd into Tucson , 2200-2900’, 28-vii-1981 (S81-35) 8♂ 3♀ . Why , 1740’, 20-viii-1998 (S98-71) 4♀ . Pinal Co., Picacho Peak State Park , 1780’, 18-viii-1998 (S98-66) 1♂ . Yavapai Co., Agua Fria Nat. Monument , 1130m, 19-ix, 2011 (S11-105) 1♂ 8♀ ; 12-vi-2012 (S12-24) 1♀. Camp Verde , 22-viii-2012, (S12-107) 1♀ . Cordes Junction , 1100m, 18-ix-2011 (S11-103) 2♂ . Yuma Co., Telegraph Pass , 210m, 15-ix-2011, (S11-92) 1♂. Yuma , Arizona Western College , 200’, 18-vi-1990 (S90-54) 1♂ 1♀ . California. San Bernardino Co., Essex , 5.1 m W, 1500’, 21-viii-1998 (S98-76) 1♀ . Havasu Lake , 140’: 6-vi-1983 (S83-62) 1♂ heard; 13-xi-2011 (S11-84) 3♂. Nevada. Clark Co., Cottonwood Cove : 750’, 24-vi-1980 (S80-36) 1♀ ; 26-vii-1981 (S81-31) 1♂ . New Mexico. Hidalgo Co., Road Forks , 4195’, 29-vii-1981 (S81-38) 1♂ ; 21-viii-2012 (S12-104) 5♂ 9♀ . Utah. Washington Co., Hurricane , 1040m, 20-iv-1999 (S99-12) 1♂ . La Verkin , 1040m, 11-ix-2004 (S04-121) 3♂ .
Song records only. (only one male heard at each locality): Arizona, Coconino Co., Flagstaff, 6900’, 21-viii- 1982 (S82-86); California, Inyo Co., Death Valley Nat. Park, Furnace Creek , - 52m, 23-vi-1980 (S80-32). New Mexico, Socorro Co., Socorro, 4460’, 13-vi-2007 (S07-50).
Derivation of name. Staccato means “something that is abruptly discontinuous or disjointed in quality or character,” which describes the calling song of most males.
Geographic range. ( Fig. 188 View FIGURE 188 ). Also, south into the Mexican states of Sonora, Chihuahua, and Sinaloa.
Habitat. Primarily open desert grassland/scrubland below 1220m but occasionally at higher elevations, e.g. mixed oak/ juniper/pine woodland at 2026m (Schnebly Hill, ~ 5 m E Sedona, AZ, 7-vii-2003 [DAG 2003-305]) and 2103m within the town of Flagstaff, AZ (S82-86). Flies well and frequents lighted areas around human structures, especially gas stations with all night florescent lights. Can sing in the open or from cracks in the ground. Large population in rock garden area at McDonald’s in Gila Bend (S15-111). Wilcox Playa, AZ, (S15-104) males sang in daytime 1 meter above ground, along with G. lightfooti , from within Yucca elata plants.
Life cycle and seasonal occurrence. No egg diapause in Arizona localities: Ajo (S11-99), Yuma (S90-54), and Safford (90-51). Probably 2 generations/year although may depend upon rainfall. Adults known from April to October, but months outside of these have not been checked. Breeds continuously under laboratory conditions.
Variation. See Table 1 View TABLE 1 (p. 18) for measurements. Color: Varies from light tan to almost solid black ( Fig. 187 View FIGURE 187 ), although face always with some areas of tan or cream. Most light-colored individuals with three longitudinal stripes on top of head, middle stripe sometimes broken. In very dark individuals, stripes not visible. Hind wing length: Variable in both sexes, with about 80% of all adults with long hind wings. Yet even in individuals whose hind wings don’t extend beyond the tip of the abdomen, the hind wings present are longer than those in taxa that always have short hind wings. Of 62 individuals from Gila Bend (S81-47, S09-103, S11-101, S15-111), 60 had long hind wings and 2 had shed their hind wings. Song: Chirp rate— Within a population, both regular and irregular chirp rate songs are commonly heard. We found mixed song populations at several Arizona localities: Kingman (S91-67), Ajo (S98- 74), Tucson (S09-53), Sedona (S94-35), Buckeye (S11-102), Gila Bend (S11-101) and Robles Junction (S11-95); and at Road Forks, New Mexico (S12-104). We have recorded a number of individuals that produce both regular and irregular songs (e.g. DAG 2004-006, Wickenburg, Maricopa Co. , AZ, 4-iv-2004; DAG 2004-084, Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, Pima Co. , AZ, 8-iv-2004). DNA from individuals of G. staccato with both regular and irregular songs confirms that one species is involved ( Fig. 174 View FIGURE 174 ). Pulse rate — Since we measured pulse rate between the last two pulses in a chirp, the pulse rate decreases as the number of pulses increases. This phenomenon was illustrated in G. multipulsator ( Fig. 69 View FIGURE 69 , p. 81 View FIGURE 81 , and Fig. 2B View FIGURE 2 in Weissman et al. 2009) where a pulse-by-pulse analysis showed that the pulse period increases for each sequential pulse in a chirp, due to increasing pulse duration. Extrapolating this general finding (Weissman unpubl.) to G. staccato males with songs with 7-9 p/c and comparing their PR (calculated between the last two pulses in a chirp) to irregular songs with 2-8 p/c, shows a similar phenomenon: the PR in a chirp with 3 pulses is higher than the PR in a chirp with 8 pulses. Even so, the PR in G. staccato is higher than G. personatus chirps with the same number of pulses. Thus, an irregular-song G. staccato male with 3 p/c can have a PR of 111 at 25°C. This same male, in a chirp of eight pulses, can have a PR of 83 at the same temperature. For comparison, a G. personatus with 8 p/c would have a PR around 65 at 25°C.
DNA. Multilocus 2016-034 from Yavapai Co., AZ. Two sister species G. lineaticeps 2016 -033 (Tracy, CA) and G. personatus G1357 (Otero Co., CO) (Gray et al. 2019).
Discussion. There were unusual sex ratios at some Arizona and New Mexico gas station collections: Catalina (S98-65), Why (S98-71), and Road Forks (S12-104). At these localities, night collecting mostly yielded adult females, possibly from two causes: (1) males were in better hiding places, especially if singing or (2) males were already dead because parasitized by tachinids.At Agua Fria National Monument (S11-105), on 19-ix-2011, only one male G. staccato heard but unable to collect since singing from deep soil crack. That same night we collected one male and eight females at oatmeal trails. This one collected male sang with 7-8 p/c with a variable CR. We wonder if this male survived the tachinid onslaught because he was taciturn or his song was not attractive to the fly parasitoids (see Sakaguchi & Gray 2011, for discussion).
Singing males are easy to approach. They should make excellent material for female choice studies given the variability in the calling song.
G. staccato and G. personatus can hybridize and backcross in the laboratory (DAG, unpublished) but different microhabitats, and geographic allopatry, probably prevent such events in nature, although they can be “brought together” at bright lights in gas stations (e.g. Road Forks, NM, S81-38).
Male G. staccato parasitized by tachinid Ormia ochracea were collected from the following Arizona localities: Catalina (S98-65); Wenden (S11-87); 6 m S Robles Junction (S11-95); Cordes Junction (S11-103), and Agua Fria ( Sakaguchi & Gray 2011).
MN |
Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro |
CAS |
California Academy of Sciences |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |