Molossus aztecus Saussure, 1860
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/zoosystema2018v40a18 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2E6C5EBA-6376-4016-A1A6-70F7FC8E5AF4 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4331024 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1320879D-FFB4-FF9B-FC3D-FA086F09FC2F |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Molossus aztecus Saussure, 1860 |
status |
|
Molossus aztecus Saussure, 1860 View in CoL
Molossus aztecus Saussure, 1860: 285 View in CoL .
Molossus molossus View in CoL – Willig et al. 1986: 671.
EMENDED DIAGNOSIS. — Medium-sized Molossus View in CoL with dense and long dark dorsal fur. Dorsal hair reaching 6.0 mm and varying from dark cocoa brown to blackish. Monochromatic dorsal hairs or with a small pale basal band covering no more than 1/4 of the total length. Forearm length averages 39.5 mm in males (35.9- 41.5) and 39.0 mm in females (35.0-41.9). Greatest length of skull averages 17.6 mm (16.3-18.3) in males and 16.7 mm (16.1- 18.6) in females ( Table 1 View TABLE ). Basioccipital pits moderate in depth ( Fig. 6A View FIG ). Occipital complex rectangular in posterior view due to the development and inclination of the lambdoidal crests ( Fig. 6B View FIG ). Inflated rostrum and rounded braincase ( Fig. 6C View FIG ). Infraorbital foramen opening laterally in frontal view ( Fig. 6D View FIG ). Nasal process of the premaxilla well developed in males, protruding over the nasal cavity ( Fig. 6C View FIG ). Skull with mastoid processes oriented ventrally in posterior view. Triangular rostrum in frontal view with narrow dorsal portion ( Fig. 6D View FIG ). Upper incisors spatulated with convergent tips ( Fig. 6D View FIG ).
VARIATION. — The dorsal pelage varies from dark grayish to blackish. In females, the occipital complex may be less distinctly squared due to smaller lambdoidal crests. Sagittal crests in females are also lower and less robust than males, and the nasal process of the premaxilla is less developed. The upper incisors vary among individuals with some specimens being less spatulated and more elongated than average (AMNH 10245).
DISTRIBUTION. — M. aztecus is widely distributed from Mexico and Central America ( Dolan 1989) to South America, in Venezuela ( Handley 1976; Ochoa et al. 1993; Lim & Engstrom 2001) and southeastern Brazil ( Gregorin et al. 2011). This study extends the distribution of M. aztecus to nine Brazilian states confirming the occurrence of the species in Mammanguapé (Paraíba), Huimatá (Amazonas), Rio de Janeiro (Rio de Janeiro), São José do Piauí (Piauí), Corumbá (Mato Grosso do Sul), Crato (Ceará), Lavras and Sete Lagoas (Minas Gerais), Exu (Pernambuco), Salvador (Bahia), and Ilha dos Búzios (São Paulo) ( Fig. 7 View FIG ).
REMARKS
The body size of M. aztecus is very similar to M. molossus and therefore, these two taxa are frequently confused. However, both species are distinguished by several qualitative characters, such as a pale band at the base of the dorsal hair, which is discrete or imperceptible in M. aztecus , and long and obvious in M. molossus . The dorsal fur of M. aztecus is grayish to blackish, while M. molossus usually has a cocoa to cinnamon brown colouration. M. aztecus has a shorter and inflated braincase and domed skull ( Fig. 6C View FIG ), while in M. molossus the skull is more elongated. The sagittal and lambdoidal crests in M. aztecus are more developed ( Fig. 6B View FIG ) than in M. molossus . In M. aztecus , the rostrum is triangular ( Fig. 6D View FIG ), whereas in M. molossu s it is rectangular. The infraorbital foramen in M. aztecus opens laterally ( Fig. 6D View FIG ) while in M. molossus it opens frontally. The occipital in M. aztecus has a clear quadrangular format ( Fig. 6B View FIG ), while in M. molossus this structure is triangular or rounded. The upper incisors in M. aztecus are flat and spatulated ( Fig. 6D View FIG ), per incisors with parallel tips. Although some authors do not consider M. aztecus as a valid species ( Jennings et al. 2000; Eger 2008), our data indicate that it is consistently distinguishable from M. molossus and M. coibensis based on morphological characters, corroborating Dolan (1989) and Gregorin et al. (2011).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Molossus aztecus Saussure, 1860
Loureiro, Livia Oliveira, Gregorin, Renato & Perini, Fernando Araujo 2018 |
Molossus molossus
WILLIG M. R. & HOLLANDER R. R. 1986: 671 |
Molossus aztecus
SAUSSURE M. H. 1860: 285 |