Pseudotritia ardua, Willmann, 1920
publication ID |
ORI111 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6285385 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1156E543-E078-3BCB-3EE2-8F7031F6614E |
treatment provided by |
Thomas |
scientific name |
Pseudotritia ardua |
status |
|
Pseudotritia ardua (C. L. Koch, 1841)
Hoplophora ardua C. L. Koch , 1841, fasc. 32 (15).
Tritia lentula , Berlese, 1887a, fasc. 36 (3); 1896b, p. 20.
Phthiracarus canestrinii Michael , 1898, p. 81.
Phtiracarus canestrinii , Berlese, 1913a, p. 55.
Tritia ardua , Sellnick, 1923, p. 12, figs. 1, 12, 23, 24.
Oribotritia ardua , Sellnick, 1928, p. 39.
Pseudotritia ardua , Jacot, 1930, p. 243, pl. 38 figs. 44-51; Märkel, 1958, p. 486, fig. 5.
Oribotritia loricata , Willmann, 1931, p. 194, fig. 358.
Berlese's figure of Tritia lentula (non lentula C. L. Koch ) demonstrates that the species has one lateral ridge on the aspis, and a slightly thickened sensillus; it is therefore identical with Pseudotritia ardua (C. L. Koch) , and different from the related species P. duplicata Grandjean (cf. Märkel, 1958).
In the Berlese Collection I studied two slides (nos. 215/41, 42) with speciniens from Torino that are ardua indeed.
I remark that Michael's arduus is duplicata , whilst he gave the name canestrinii to our ardua . Berlese (1913a) apparently accepted this opinion, for at that time he mentioned arduus as well as canestrinii . Probably both species are present in the Collection, because Lombardini (1936, p. 50) mentioned both Tritia ardua and Tritia lentula (Michael's canestrinii ) in his Catalogue.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
InfraOrder |
Enarthronota |
Family |
|
Genus |
Pseudotritia ardua
van der Hammen, L. 1959 |
Pseudotritia ardua
Willmann 1920 |
Phtiracarus canestrinii
Berlese 1904 |