Neogoneplax, Castro, 2007
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.4525564 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/102B87CB-FFD8-2539-FF53-FCDBFBD7FD91 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Neogoneplax |
status |
gen. nov. |
Genus Neogoneplax View in CoL n. gen.
Goneplax View in CoL – Tesch 1918: 181 (part). — Sakai 1939: 562 [in key], 563; 1976: 537 (part). — Balss 1957: 1656 (part). — Guinot 1969b: 520; 1971: 1081 (part). — Serène 1964: 189, 190; 1968: 89 (part). — Dai et al. 1986: 376 (part). — Dai & Yang 1991: 406 (part). — Karasawa & Kato 2003b: 130 [in list], 140 [in list], 141 [in table] (part). — Komatsu & Takeda 2003: 1243 (part).
TYPE SPECIES. — Goneplax renoculis Rathbun, 1914 (by present designation; gender feminine).
SPECIES INCLUDED . — Neogoneplax costata View in CoL n. sp.; N. renoculis ( Rathbun, 1914) View in CoL n. comb.; N. serratipes View in CoL n. sp.
All species are restricted to the Indo-West Pacific region.
ETYMOLOGY. — From neos, Greek for “new”, and the generic name Goneplax , to indicate that although the species included in the new genus superficially resemble Goneplax in the general shape of their carapaces and the elongated eye peduncles, they actually belong to a separate new genus.
DESCRIPTION
Carapace ( Figs 28B View FIG ; 30A View FIG ; 31 View FIG ; 33A View FIG ; 34 View FIG ; Chen 1998: fig. 11-1) transversely rectangular, much wider than long; widest at conspicuous outer orbital teeth; front slightly deflected ventrally, sinuous, marked by 2 slight emarginations, small to minute median projection between emarginations. Slight notch between front, inner edge of supraorbital border; orbits wide, greatly expanded distally; supraorbital borders conspicuously convex; suborbital borders convex, with 1 or 2 slight, obtuse inner teeth not visible dorsally; anterolateral borders short, straight. Dorsal surface of carapace smooth or with slight horizontal ridges, moderately convex, without clear indication of regions. Outer orbital angle with conspicuous, acute tooth; acute anterolateral tooth on each side of carapace (much reduced in N. costata n. sp.). Basal antennal article short, distalmost (third) article nearly reaches front. Eye peduncles ( Figs 28B View FIG ; 30A View FIG ; 31 View FIG ; 33A View FIG ; 34 View FIG ) long, shorter than or longer than front (0.8-1.1 front width); cornea strongly reniform, dorso-ventrally flattened, nearly divided into anterior and posterior portions. Anterior border of endostome well demarcated from buccal cavern, ridges faint but clearly defined. Third maxillipeds nearly completely close the buccal cavern. No obvious stridulating mechanism other than possible rubbing of proximal portion of cheliped (P1) merus against pterygostomial ridge. Thoracic sternum wide. Median sulcus on thoracic sternite 4 absent; sutures 4/5, 5/6, 7/8 interrupted medially, 6/7 complete ( Fig. 32 View FIG ). Anterior end of sterno-abdominal cavity anterior to thoracic sternite 4. Cheliped fingers ( Figs 28B View FIG ; 31 View FIG ; 34 View FIG ) long, slender, shovel-like, curved, pollex higher than dactylus in large individuals, shorter than elongated propodus; dactylus light in colour, without dark portion; carpus with conspicuous tooth on inner margin. Dorsal margins of ambulatory leg (P2-P5) meri unarmed ( N. costata n. sp.; Fig. 31 View FIG ), with acute distal tooth ( N. renoculis n. comb.; Fig. 28B View FIG ), or several teeth ( N. serratipes n. sp.; Figs 33B View FIG , 34 View FIG ); dactyli slender, with carina on each side, non-setose. Male abdomen ( Figs 30B View FIG ; 33C View FIG ; Chen 1998: fig. 11-3, as G. renoculis ) with 6 freely-movable somites plus telson, wide, somites 4-6 gradually decreasing in width from somite 3 (widest somite).Telson wide, clearly longer than wide. Somite 3 covers space between P5 coxae, somite 2 narrower than somite 3; somites 1, 2 leave small to large portion of thoracic sternite 8 visible. G1 varies from long, slender, slightly sinuous, slightly broadened proximally ( Fig. 30C View FIG ) to stout, short, with obtuse tip ( Fig. 33D View FIG ; Chen 1998: fig. 11-4, as G. renoculis ). G2 ( Figs 30D View FIG ; 33E View FIG ) slender, slightly shorter to slightly longer than G1, flagellum slightly longer than proximal part (peduncle), tip curved or straight, pointed. Penis arising from P5 coxa, moderate size; broad, soft proximal expansion. Female abdomen ( Dai & Yang 1991: fig. 198-2, as G. renoculis ) with 6 freely-movable somites, wide. Telson much wider than long. Somite 3 covers space between P5 coxae, somite 2 slightly narrower than somite 3; somites 1, 2 leave small portion of thoracic sternite 8 visible. Vulva of mature females ( Fig. 32 View FIG ) small, oval, extending from 5/6 suture to median portion of thoracic sternite 6, vulvar cover present.
REMARKS
The new genus is described for Goneplax renoculis Rathbun, 1914 , which is different from the four mostly Atlantic species of Goneplax sensu stricto. The polyphyletic nature of Goneplax sensu lato and the questions surrounding the position of the Indo-West Pacific species of the genus are discussed in the Remarks section for Goneplax (see above).
Characters that separate Neogoneplax n. gen. from Goneplax sensu stricto and the five Indo-West Pacific genera that were formerly included in Goneplax sensu lato are summarized in Table 4.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Neogoneplax
Castro, Peter 2007 |
Goneplax
KARASAWA H. & KATO H. 2003: 130 |
KOMATSU H. & TAKEDA M. 2003: 1243 |
DAI A. & YANG S. 1991: 406 |
DAI A. & YANG S. & SONG Y. & CHEN G. 1986: 376 |
GUINOT D. 1971: 1081 |
GUINOT D. 1969: 520 |
SERENE R. 1964: 189 |
BALSS H. 1957: 1656 |
SAKAI T. 1939: 562 |
TESCH J. J. 1918: 181 |