Celosia argentea, Linnaeus, 1753
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.90.1.1 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0F1F8782-4670-FF80-FF1C-FB1AFC56F972 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Celosia argentea |
status |
comb. et stat. nov. |
Celosia argentea View in CoL L. var. margaritacea (L.) Iamonico, comb. et stat. nov.
Celosia margaritacea Linnaeus (1762: 297) View in CoL . Lectotype (designated by Iamonico & Jarvis 2012):—ORIGIN UNKNOWN “ Habitat in America ”, Herb. Linnaeanum no. 288.2 (LINN!).
Celosia castrensis View in CoL was first published by Linnaeus in 1762. The diagnosis is followed by four synonyms, of which one [that from Matthioli et al. (1586) “ Amaranthus cristatus View in CoL ”] had been previously been cited by Linnaeus (1753: 205) under C. cristata View in CoL (as an unnamed variety β “ Amaranthus cristatus View in CoL ”). Obviously, the author changed his concept of the species. Linnaeus had indeed a broad concept of C. cristata View in CoL in 1753. A third species was in fact described by Linnaeus in the second edition of Species Plantarum (1762): C. coccinea Linnaeus (1762: 297). The name was lectotypified by Townsend (1994: 4) on the specimen No. 288.6 (LINN). The sheet bears the original annotation “ 2 coccinea ”, where the number “ 2 ” is the species number in Linnaeus’ 1753 treatment of Celosia View in CoL (under C. cristata View in CoL ) while “ coccinea ” was presumably added before 1762. The three taxa appear to be very similar from the morphological point of view, being characterized in having cristate inflorescences and ovate-lanceolate leaves. In particular, C. castrensis View in CoL differs from C. cristata View in CoL in having linear stipules. The recognition of C. castrensis View in CoL is here at variety rank [(the name C. cristata View in CoL has priority according to Art. 11.4 of the ICN ( McNeill et al. 2012)].
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Celosia argentea
Iamonico, Duilio 2013 |
Celosia margaritacea
Linnaeus, C. 1762: ) |