Tsitsikamma (Tsitsikamma) favus Samaai & Kelly, 2002
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4896.3.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FD238C7C-E3F8-408B-9711-9A0BFFF69692 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4395860 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0A5787DE-A975-FFC4-FF5C-6E13FE2290B0 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Tsitsikamma (Tsitsikamma) favus Samaai & Kelly, 2002 |
status |
|
Tsitsikamma (Tsitsikamma) favus Samaai & Kelly, 2002 View in CoL
( Figs 8 View FIGURE 8 , 9 View FIGURE 9 , Table 1, 2)
Tsitsikamma favus Samaai and Kelly, 2002: 718 View in CoL ; fig. 6 A–G.
Tsitsikamma favus, Samaai et al. 2003: 11 View in CoL ; fig. 3f; 17; fig. 6A; Parker-Nance et al. 2019: 105; fig. 1a–p; table 1.
Type & locality (not examined). Holotype — NHMUK 1997.7 About NHMUK .3.2, Rheeders Reef, Tsitsikamma View in CoL National Park, 34.166° S, 23.900° E, 22 m, collected by P. Coetzee, 1995.
Material examined. NIWA 110724 View Materials , Table Top Reef, Algoa Bay, Port Elizabeth , 33.980° S, 25.693° E, 18 m, collected by Patrick L. Colin GoogleMaps , CRRF, 4 Oct 1998, identified by Michelle Kelly , NIWA, Auckland; NIWA 110826 View Materials , White sands Reef, Algoa Bay , Port Elizabeth , 33.995° S, 25.707° E, 14 m, collected by Patrick L. Colin GoogleMaps , CRRF, 17 Feb 1999, identified by Michelle Kelly , NIWA; NIWA 111059 View Materials , Grootbank, Plettenberg Bay , 34.007° S, 23.496° E, 10–14 m, collected by Patrick L. Colin GoogleMaps , CRRF, 22 Mar 2000, identified by Michelle Kelly , NIWA, Auckland; SAMC-A091443, Grootbank, Plettenberg Bay , 34.007° S, 23.496° E, 10–14 m, collected by Patrick L. Colin GoogleMaps , CRRF, 22 Mar 2000, identified by Michelle Kelly , NIWA, Auckland. SAMC-A090900, SAMC-A090902, Flat Rock, Jeffreys Bay , 34.102° S, 24.958° E, 13 m, collected by M. Pfaff, S. Kirkman, I. Malick and L. Snyders GoogleMaps , 8 Aug 2016; SAMC-A090901, Grootbank, Plettenberg Bay , 34.006° S, 23.495° E, 40 m, collected by T. Samaai GoogleMaps , 25 Feb 1999; SAMC-A090903, Seal Point, Cape St Francis , 34.223° S, 25.852° E, 15 m, collected by T. Haupt & I. Malick GoogleMaps , 9 Aug 2016; SAMC-A090904, SAMC-A091416, SAMC-A091417, SAMC-A091418, Evans Peak, Algoa Bay, Port Elizabeth , 33.842° S, 25.816° E, 30 m, collected by Rhodes University GoogleMaps , May 2010; SAMC-A090905, Bell Buoy, Sardinia Bay, 33.980° S, 25.698° E, Algoa Bay , Port Elizabeth , 16 m, collected by C. Evans GoogleMaps , 25 May 2009; SAMC-A090906, Tsitsikamma National Park , 34.091° S, 23.895° E, 14 m, collected by T. Samaai GoogleMaps , May 2009; SAMC-A091414, Rheeders Reef, Tsitsikamma National Park , 34.166° S, 23.900° E, 18 m, collected by M. Davies-Coleman GoogleMaps , 1 Oct 1998; SAMC-A091415, Rheeders Reef, Tsitsikamma National Park , 34.166° S, 23.900° E, 22 m, collected by M. Davies-Coleman GoogleMaps , 25 Feb 1994; SAMC-A091419, SAMC-A091420, SAMC-A091421, Evans Peak, Algoa Bay, Port Elizabeth , 33.842° S, 25.816° E, 30 m, collected by Rhodes University GoogleMaps , May 2009; SAMC-A091422, SAMC-A091423, SAMC-A091424, Phillips Reef, (33.974° S, 25.681° E), Algoa Bay, Port Elizabeth , 30 m, collected by Rhodes University GoogleMaps , 10 Aug 2010; SAMC-A091425, Suicide Reef, Sardinia Bay, 34.005° S, 25.636° E, Algoa Bay , Port Elizabeth , 16 m, collected by C. Evans GoogleMaps , 25 May 2009; SAMC-A091426, off Christian Centre, Sardinia Bay, 34.053° S, 25.648° E, Algoa Bay , Port Elizabeth , 16 m, collected by C. Evans GoogleMaps , 25 May 2009; SAMC-A091427, Swim Thru, Sardinia Bay, 34.049° S, 25.648° E, Algoa Bay , Port Elizabeth , 16 m, collected by C. Evans GoogleMaps , 25 May 2009; SAMC-A091428, Seal Point, Cape St Francis , 34.223° S, 25.852° E, 15 m, collected by T. Haupt & I. Malick GoogleMaps , 8 Aug 2016; SAMC-A091429, Table Top Reef, Algoa Bay, Port Elizabeth , 33.980° S, 25.693° E, 16 m, collected by Patrick L. Colin GoogleMaps , CRRF, 4 Oct 1998, identified by Michelle Kelly , NIWA. SAMC-A091442, Grootbank, Plettenberg Bay , 34.006° S, 23.384° E, 16 m, collected by T. Samaai GoogleMaps , 25 February 1999.
Additional material (not examined). CASIZ 300535, Table Top Reef, Algoa Bay, Port Elizabeth , 33.980° S, 25.693° E, 16 m, collected by Patrick L. Colin, CRRF, 4 Oct 1998 GoogleMaps , identified by Michelle Kelly, NIWA; CASIZ 300636 View Materials , White sands Reef, Algoa Bay , Port Elizabeth , 33.995° S, 25.707° E, 14 m, collected by Patrick L. Colin, CRRF, 17 Feb 1999 GoogleMaps , field identification by L. J. Bell, CRRF, listed in Parker-Nance et al. (2019); CASIZ 301054, Grootbank, Plettenberg Bay , 34.007° S, 23.496° E, 10–14 m, collected by Patrick L. Colin, CRRF, 22 Mar 2000 GoogleMaps , identified by Michelle Kelly, NIWA, Auckland; SAIAB 141112 About SAIAB , Knoll Reef, Tsitsikamma National Park , 34.166° S, 23.900° E, 18 m, collected by C. Buxton & M. Davies-Coleman, 2 May 1993 GoogleMaps ; SAIAB 141356 About SAIAB , Rheeders Reef, Tsitsikamma National Park , 34.166° S, 23.900° E, collected by P. Coetzee, R. Palmer & B. Carté, 18 Mar 1995 GoogleMaps .
Type location. Rheeders Reef, Tsitsikamma National Park, 22 m.
Distribution. Plettenberg Bay, Tsitsikamma Marine Protected Area, St. Francis Bay, St. Jeffreys Bay, Sardinia Bay and Algoa Bay.
Diagnosis. Varying morphology being either massive, lobate sometimes hemispherical to thickly encrusting, 5–10 cm thick and 10–20 cm diameter, surface very rugose and crowded with large single to multichambered cylindrical lance-shaped (button shaped) oscules, 1–4 mm wide, 6 mm high and with cauliform areolate porefields, 3 mm wide, 3–5 mm high, with no membrane ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 ). Sponge is hard and slightly compressible or soft and fleshy; colour in life vary being either dark brown, liver brown, turquoise or dark green ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 ; Table 1), internally olive or dark green/brown; in alcohol, ectosome black or dark brown, choanosome black. The choanosome is divided into honeycomb-like chambers and convoluted layers by very thick reinforced tracts of anisostyles, forming meshes that are elliptical in shape and 5800 μm wide ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 ). The ectosome is composed of a thick, dense feltwork of tangential and paratangential anisostyles. A single layer of erect isochiadiscorhabds lines the surface of the ectosome ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 ). Megascleres ( Table 1, 2) are anisostyles in two size categories: (1) slightly curved and thickened centrally, 621 (537–700) × 14 (14) μm); (2) thinner slightly curved centrally: type species: 530 (480–566) × 9.6 (9.6) μm) ( Table 2). Microscleres ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 ; Table 1, 2) are isochiadiscorhabds with three whorls of cylindrical, conical tubercles, the apex of each tubercular projection is acanthoses; some isochiadiscorhabds (10%) malformed or having a rudimentary forth whorl ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 ): 48 (41–60) × 9 (7.2–9.6). Sponge occurs in exposed coastal bays from Plettenberg Bay to Algoa Bay at depths of 9–40 m; abundant between 15–20 m in areas of strong surge where coastal upwelling occurs. Attached to hard rocky substrata associated with other invertebrates. Specimens are often abundant and occur within a metre distance from one another. The species contains biologically active pyrroloiminoquinone alkaloids, tsitsikammamines A and B and discorhabdin derivatives +14-Bromo-3-dihydrodiscorhabdin C and 14-Bromodiscorhabdin C that may have pharmacological potential [Cytotoxicity against Human Colon Tumour cell line (HCT 116)] ( Antunes et al. 2004, 2005).
DNA sequence data. We sequenced partial COI of collected material from different localities; GenBank accession numbers: COI MK153285 View Materials – MK153287 View Materials , MK153289 View Materials , MK153292 View Materials – MK153293 View Materials , MK153288 View Materials , MK153290 View Materials – MK153291 View Materials .
Remarks. When T. (T.) favus was first described, it was considered to be rare ( Samaai and Kelly 2002; Samaai et al. 2006) as it was only known from reefs shallower than 20 m at Tsitsikamma MPA and Algoa Bay. We have made spicule measurements and compared the isochiadiscorhabd morphology for a variety of Tsitsikamma specimens collected from St. Francis Bay (FB), Jeffreys Bay (JB), and the deeper reefs (30–40 m) off Grootbank, Plettenberg Bay (PB) (see also Parker-Nance et al. 2019) and found them to be similar in morphology and spiculation to T. (T.) favus described by Samaai et al. (2004) from Tsitsikamma MPA (T) and Algoa Bay (AB). These locations are within a 100 nautical mile (nmi) radius (T – PB = approx. 20 nmi; PB – JB = approx. 50 nmi; JB – AB = approx. 40 nmi) and form part of an extensive subsurface cold-water ridge area on the south coast (Agulhas ecoregion) (see Hutchings et al. 2002). Extensive surveys conducted along the South African coast in the last couple of years, failed to spot any T. favus south of 30◦ S or north of 33◦ S, thus suggesting this species has a geographic range that is influenced by coastal upwelling (see Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 , 3 View FIGURE 3 ). This is in marked contrast to the southeast coast environment were the three new Tsitsikamma spp. were retrieved.
While we have expanded both the geographical and depth range of this species, its range is nonetheless small, and restricted to coastal upwelling zones on the south coast of South Africa. The morphology, spicule complement, and spicule sizes of the new material all fall within the size range of the type specimen ( Table 2) .
Examination of the numerous T. (T.) favus specimens across its geographical ranged allowed us to assess the intra-specific morphological variation of the external morphology, colour, shape of oscula and areolate porefields and the shape of the isochiadiscorhabds and structure of the conical tubercles. We found that the majority of isochiadiscorhabds possess three whorls, with a small percentage being malformed or having a rudimentary forth whorl ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 ). The variation in isochiadiscorhabd morphology of T. (T.) favus was also observed by Samaai and Kelly (2002), Kalinski et al. (2019) and Parker-Nance et al. (2019). Tsitsikamma (T.) favus have a characteristic base pigmentation of deep brownish black or liver brown that is often and variously tinged with deep green to dark turquoise; the ethanol preservative is always oily-looking and deeply pigmented; while the preserved specimens are dark brown. Some species are a lighter oak brown throughout. It is interesting to note that specimens of T. (T.) favus without discorhabdins are a lighter brown than their discorhabdin-containing siblings ( Samaai and Kelly 2002).
Tsitsikamma (T.) favus occurs with T. (T.) scurra in areas of local coastal upwelling or high wave surge. Tsitsikamma (T.) scurra differs from T. (T.) favus in the following characteristics: 1) Tsitsikamma (T.) scurra is lime green with a brownish surface in situ, and has long, hollow, strappy oscular fistules ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 ), while T. (T.) favus is turquoise to dark brown or olive brown, semispherical and with short surface extensions ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 ); 2) Tsitsikamma (T.) scurra has a folded globular thick encrusting growth structure with thin sandpaper-like ectosome ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 ) ( Samaai et al. 2006; Parker-Nance et al. 2019) while T. (T.) favus has a globular to semi-spherical morphology with a dense, thick ectosome; 3) Tsitsikamma (T.) scurra has larger, thicker anisostyles [thick 829 (774–882) × 24 μm; thin 669 (585–738) × 17 μm] than T. (T.) favus [thick 621 (537–700) × 14 (14) μm; thin 530 (480–566) × 9.6 (9.6 μm], but the isochiadiscorhabds are smaller than those found in the type species [ T. (T.) scurra : 41 (38–45) × 8 μm; T. (T.) favus : 48 (41–60) × 9 (7.2–9.6) μm] (see Table 1); 4) Isochiadiscorhabds of Tsitsikamma (T.) scurra ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 ) have three whorls of conico-cylindrical tubercules project at 45° to the shaft in pairs whereas up to five complete whorls as well as many intermediate forms are found in T. (T.) favus . The tubercles projections are either arranged in pairs or in groups of three in T. (T.) favus ; 5) The distribution of the two species is disparate; Tsitsikamma (T.) scurra is recorded from Hout Bay in the southern Benguela ecoregion while T. (T.) favus is recorded from the Agulhas ecoregion; 6) Tsitsikamma (T.) scurra only contains the biologically active pyrroloiminoquinone alkaloid derivative 14-Bromodiscorhabdin C ( Antunes et al. 2004), while in T. (T.) favus the biologically active pyrroloiminoquinone alkaloid tsitsikammamines A and B and discorhabdin derivatives +14-Bromo-3-dihydrodiscorhabdin C and 14-Bromodiscorhabdin C are found ( Samaai and Kelly, 2002; Antunes et al. 2004, 2005).
Tsitsikamma (T.) favus can also be compared to T. (T.) nguni : (1) Tsitsikamma (T.) nguni is dark slate to black coloured in situ, thickly encrusting or hemispherical, and has small short, blunt rounded knob-shape or button like oscula and small round porefields; (2) Tsitsikamma (T.) nguni are also firm and ridged, with a thick ectosome visible, like in T. (T.) favus (Parker-Nance et al. 2019) ; (3) Tsitsikamma (T.) nguni have on average smaller anisostyles [thick 555 (428–672) × 14 (10–19) μm; thin 561 (449–832) × 10 (3–14) μm] (see also Tables 1, 2) (Parker-Nance et al. 2019) than T. (T.) favus [thick 621 (537–700) × 14 (14) μm; thin 530 (480–566) × 9.6 (9.6) μm]; (4) the isochiadiscorhabds are similar in average size (51 (40–60) μm) to that found in type species [ T. (T.) favus : 48 (41–60)] ( Table 1, 2). Tsitsikamma (T.) favus and T. (T.) nguni differ in the number of the cylindrical-conical tubercles found on the isochiadiscorhabds; three per group in T. (T.) favus and four to six in T. (T.) nguni (Parker-Nance et al. 2019) (see also Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ). The other apparent difference between T. (T.) favus and T. (T.) nguni is in the surface morphology, where T. (T.) favus have short, thick cauliform areolate porefields and lance-shaped oscula, oppose to blotchedshaped porefields and small button-shaped oscula in T. (T.) nguni .
No intraspecific genetic diversity was found for the COI gene sequence of specimens of T. (T.) favus in this study. The same results were also found by Parker-Nance et al. (2019) for specimens of T. (T.) favus using the 28S rRNA gene sequences.
NIWA |
National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Tsitsikamma (Tsitsikamma) favus Samaai & Kelly, 2002
Samaai, Toufiek, Kelly, Michelle, Ngwakum, Benedicta, Payne, Robyn, Teske, Peter R., Janson, Liesl, Kerwath, Sven, Parker, Denham & Gibbons, Mark J. 2020 |
Tsitsikamma favus
Samaai, T. & Gibbons, M. J. & Kelly, M. J. & Davies-Coleman, M. 2003: 11 |
Tsitsikamma favus
Samaai, T. & Kelly, M. 2002: 718 |