Actinopus emas, Miglio, Laura Tavares, Pérez-Miles, Fernando & Bonaldo, Alexandre B., 2020

Miglio, Laura Tavares, Pérez-Miles, Fernando & Bonaldo, Alexandre B., 2020, Taxonomic Revision of the Spider Genus Actinopus Perty, 1833 (Araneae, Mygalomorphae, Actinopodidae), Megataxa 2 (1), pp. 1-256 : 134-136

publication ID	https://doi.org/ 10.11646/megataxa.2.1.1
publication LSID	lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D8203766-9E7B-468F-9E75-F21393A1BA3D
DOI	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5655619
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0975136A-FF08-CEDA-FF77-F9C7DEC33428
treatment provided by	Plazi
scientific name	Actinopus emas
status	sp. nov.

Treatment

Actinopus emas View in CoL sp. nov.

Figs 119–121 View FIGURE 119 View FIGURE 120 View FIGURE 121 , Map 6 View MAP 6

Type material. Holotype male from 18º 10’ 00.00” S 52º 45’ 00.00” W, Parque Nacional das Emas, Mineiros, Goiás, Brazil , ii.1999, F. Rodrigues leg. ( IBSP 108072 View Materials ) GoogleMaps . Paratype: BRAZIL. Goiás: Mineiros, Parque Nacional da Emas , 18º 10’ 00.00” S 52º 45’ 00.00” W, 1♂, ii.1999, F. Rodrigues leg. ( IBSP 108072 View Materials ) GoogleMaps .

Etymology. The specific name is a noun in apposition from the type locality name.

Diagnosis. Males of A. emas resemble those of A. paranensis ( Fig. 115 View FIGURE 115 A–C), A. pusillus ( Fig. 118 View FIGURE 118 A–C) and A. bocaina ( Fig. 124 View FIGURE 124 A–C) the PA continuous to PAc. They resemble males of all species of the group crassipes , except A. laventana ( Fig. 129 View FIGURE 129 A–C) and A. paranensis , by the BTA being placed medially on the prolateral tegular surface.They resemble males of all species of the crassipes group, except A. crassipes ( Fig. 107 View FIGURE 107 A–C), by the serrated area distal to the PAc, continuous to proximal area of PAc. They resemble males of A. dubiomaculatus ( Fig. 112 View FIGURE 112 A–C) and A. paranensis by the serrated area being parallel to PAc extension ( Fig. 121 View FIGURE 121 A–C). They resemble males of A. crassipes by the metatarsi and tarsi being paler than other articles. They differ from those of all other species of the group by PS not visible on dorsal view ( Fig. 121 B View FIGURE 121 ); two blue-purpleish dorsal scuta on abdomen, anterior scutum thinner than porterior scutum ( Fig. 119 A View FIGURE 119 ).

MALE (IBSP 108072): Total length 8; Carapace, long 3.875; wide 3.75. Carapace anterior part tapering and posterior part triangular. Eyes. Anterior eye row slightly procurved, posterior row recurved ( Fig. 119 B View FIGURE 119 ). With few short and weak bristles between AME-clypeus, between ALE–ALP, between posterior eyes-fovea and lateral eyes-edge of carapace. Sternum with eight sigilla fused medially, two distal sigilla more fused than others ( Fig. 119 C View FIGURE 119 ). Rastellum protuberant, inverted, digitiform, V-shaped, hirsute, with thorns on border of apex ( Fig. 119 View FIGURE 119 E–F). Chelicerae with two denticles along prolateral row of teeth. Prolateral row with nine megateeth. Retrolateral row with five megateeth ( Fig. 119 D View FIGURE 119 ). Patella and tibia III with distal crown of well-developed thorns, on patella III interrupted in middle and on tibia III not interrupted in middle ( Fig. 120 View FIGURE 120 A–B). Patellae III and IV with spines on prolaterodorsal face ( Fig. 120 A, C View FIGURE 120 ). Tibia IV without spines on dorsal surface ( Fig. 120 D View FIGURE 120 ). Ventral scopulae occupying 50% of tarsus I, 70% of II and 100% of III and IV. Scopula of tarsi I and II with setae spaced, forming diffuse group of bristles; On tarsi III and IV, compact, with 10% of metatarsus I and II filled by scopula. Carapace, chelicerae, sternum, coxae, trochantera, femora, patellae, tibiae, metatarsi and tarsi reddish brown; Abdomen pale bluish-brown ( Fig. 119 A View FIGURE 119 ). Eyes: Diameters: PME 0.2, PLE 0.2, ALE 0.24, AME 0.12; MOQ: Length 0.64, front width 1.64, back width 1.52; Interdistances: PME–PME 0.84, PLE–PME 0.04, AME–AME 0.16, ALE–AME 0.4, ALE–PLE 0.24, AME–PME 0.8. Ocular area: OAL 2.62, OAW 2.25, and IF 1.12. Body: Clypeus: 0.12; Fovea: 1.62; Labium: long 0.75; wide 0.62; Chelicerae: long 1.62; wide 1.75; Sternum: long 2.37, 3.75; wide 1.75. Abdomen: long 3.62 8.5; wide 2.87. Leg measurements: I: Fe 4/ Pa 1.62/ Ti 2.5/ Me 3.37/ Ta 2.12/ total 13.62. II: 7/ 3.12/ 5.62/ 6.25/ 3.12/ 25.12. III: 4/ 1.62/ 2.75/ 3.5/ 2.12/ 14. IV: 3.37/ 1.5/ 2.12/ 3.75/ 2.12; 12.87. Formula 4123. Spination: I—Fe v0, d0, p0, r0; Pa v0, d0, p0, r0; ti v4-6-5, d0, p0-0-1, r0-0-2; Me v3-7-3, d0, p1-2-2, r0-0- 1; ta v0-3-4, d0, p0-1-2, r0-2-4. II—Fe v0, d0, p0, r0; Pa v0-0-2, d0, p0, r0; ti v0-4-3, d0, p0, r0-5-4; Me v3-7-7, d0, p1-2-1, r0-2-3; ta v1-2-6, d0, p1-2-1, r1-1-1. III—Fe v0, d0, p0, r0; Pa v0, d4-6-27, p0-0-2, r0-0-2; ti v0, d1- 0-12, p1-1-2, r0-1-2; Me v1-3-3, d0-1-2, p1-0-2, r1-0-1; ta v0, d0, p0-3-4, r0-4-6; IV—Fe v0, d0, p0, r0; Pa v0, d20-10-5, p0, r0; ti v0-0-1, d0, p0, r0; Me v0-0-1, d0, p0- 0-1, r0-0-1; ta v0, d0, p0-1-5, r0. Palp: BTA developed, placed medially on prolateral tegular surface, embolus with three keels (PAc, PS and PI) notable on prolateral, dorsal and retrolateral views. PS less developed than PI, PAc evident on prolateral, dorsal and retrolateral views. Serrated area represented by a row, continuous to PAc. Tegulum thin and elongated, PA pronounced, continuous to PAc; tegulum with a small lateral swelling above PA ( Fig. 121 View FIGURE 121 A–C).