Empis (Coptophlebia) chrysocera, Collin, 1930

Esa, C. Daugeron, 2001, Cladistics and taxonomy of the Afrotropical Empis (Coptophlebia) chrysocera-group (Diptera, Empididae), Journal of Natural History 35, pp. 583-616 : 585-586

publication ID

1464-5262

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5278962

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/085EF231-4D78-7278-6254-A5F943C7FCF4

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Empis (Coptophlebia) chrysocera
status

 

Empis (Coptophlebia) chrysocera View in CoL -group

Diagnosis

Species brown to blackish in general colour; ¯agellum styliform; proboscis about twice the head height, labium slender, strongly sclerotized, with distinct annulations; proepisternum bare; laterotergite with fan of strong black bristles; R41 5 branched at right-angle, veins M1 and M2 abbreviated; presence of pennate bristles on legs of females; male pregenital segments always strongly modi®ed. Male cerci made up of anterior almost bare lobe and posterior bristled lobe; epandrial lamellae connected anteriorly. Spermatheca unsclerotized (®gure 14).

Discussion

With the relatively short proboscis, rather short scutal bristles, the entirely brown legs, the transformed male pregenital segments and the characteristic structure of male genitalia, species of the E. (C.) chrysocera -group are very distinct from those belonging to the subgenus Disneyempis and the E. (C.) namwamba -group. On the other hand, they can be distinguished from the remaining Afrotropical Empidini by the following combination of characters: proepisternum bare, labella as long as prementum, presence of distinct annulations on labium and spermatheca unsclerotized.

Within the E. (C.) chrysocera -group, two complexes of species can be de®ned: the E. (C.) lyra - and E. (C.) chrysocera -complexes (see the cladistic analysis). They can be distinguished by the colour of the male wing, the number of notopleurals, the tint of prescutellar depression, the shape and structure of male pregenital segments (see the key to species).

Nothing is known about mating and feeding behaviour of species of the E. (C.) chrysocera -group. However, according to their label, the holotype of E. barbitos and one female paratype of E. cuthbertsoni have been collected at ¯owers of Clematis stanleyi (Ranunculaceae) and Scabiosa (Dipsacaceae) , respectively. On the other hand males have holoptic eyes with upper ommatidia enlarged. Consequently, as most of Empidini , species of the E. (C.) chrysocera -group are probably ¯ower visitors and form swarms in which mating takes place.

Distribution

The E. (C.) chrysocera -group appears widespread in Africa, from West to East and Southern Africa, but seems absent from South Africa (®gure 47): Congo, Kenya, Mozambique, Nigeria, Senegal, Tanzania, Zimbabwe.

Included species

E. (C.) brazzavillensis View in CoL sp. n.; E. (C.) barbitos Smith, 1971 View in CoL ; E. (C.) juxtaripa View in CoL sp. n.; E. (C.) lyra Smith, 1967b View in CoL ; E. (C.) plumata View in CoL sp. n.; E. (C.) chrysocera Collin, 1929 View in CoL ; E. (C.) cuthbertsoni Smith, 1971 View in CoL ; E. (C.) machipandensis Smith, 1969 View in CoL ; E. (C.) samaruensis View in CoL sp. n.; E. (C.) singulare View in CoL sp. n.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Diptera

Family

Empididae

Genus

Empis

Loc

Empis (Coptophlebia) chrysocera

Esa, C. Daugeron 2001
2001
Loc

E. (C.) brazzavillensis

Esa 2001
2001
Loc

E. (C.) juxtaripa

Esa 2001
2001
Loc

E. (C.) plumata

Esa 2001
2001
Loc

E. (C.) samaruensis

Esa 2001
2001
Loc

E. (C.) singulare

Esa 2001
2001
Loc

E. (C.) barbitos

Smith 1971
1971
Loc

E. (C.) cuthbertsoni

Smith 1971
1971
Loc

E. (C.) machipandensis

Smith 1969
1969
Loc

E. (C.) lyra

Smith 1967
1967
Loc

E. (C.) chrysocera

Collin 1930
1930
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF