Orobothriurus alticola ( Pocock, 1899 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1206/359.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:870DFDFC-45BF-49CF-8C3F-2527DB611CFC |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6841989 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/08318541-1F04-FFC0-18E9-FB49FDCC443C |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Orobothriurus alticola ( Pocock, 1899 ) |
status |
|
Orobothriurus alticola ( Pocock, 1899) View in CoL Figures 13F View Fig , 15B View Fig , 18D View Fig , 20A View Fig , 21A View Fig , 36I, J View Fig , 54 View Fig
Cercophonius brachycentrus var. b bivittatus Thorell, 1877: 183 [synonymized by Ojanguren Affilastro et al., 2009: 35].
Bothriurus alticola Pocock 1899: 357–358 , fig. 1; Kraepelin, 1911: 91, 97; Mello-Leitão, 1931: 82, 92; 1932: 34; 1934: 63, 65; 1935: 93; 1937: 103; 1945: 138, 144, 145; Bücherl, 1959a: 23, 24, fig. 4; Abalos, 1959: 591; 1963: 113; Cekalovic, 1966: 3; Bücherl, 1969: 769; Maury, 1973: 110; Roig Alsina, 1973: 198; Masnú de Moreno, 1991: 184, 189, map 1.
Bothriurus (Andibothriurus) alticola: Bücherl et al., 1963: 217 , 224, fig. 8.
Urophonius brachycentrus bivittatus: Mello-Leitão 1931: 99–100 ; 1932: 35; 1934: 48, 51; 1938: 94– 95; 1945: 213, 215; Acosta and Maury, 1998: 559; Lowe and Fet, 2000: 44.
Urophonius brachicentrus bivittatus: Mello-Leitão, 1939: 612 ; Abalos, 1959: 592; 1963: 117; Roig Alsina, 1973: 200 [incorrect subsequent spelling].
Orobothriurus bivitattus: Acosta, 2005: 3–12 , figs. 1–8; Ojanguren Affilastro, 2005: 181–183, 220, 241; Acosta, 2006: 20, 21; ICZN, 2008: 69–70.
Orobothriurus alticola: Maury, 1976: 17–18 View in CoL , figs. 1–10, table 1 View TABLE 1 (part); 1979: 717, map 10 (part); 1981: 98 (part); Acosta and Maury, 1998: 559 (part); Kovařík, 1998: 101; Acosta and Ochoa, 2000: 135, 136, 143; Lowe and Fet, 2000: 35; Acosta and Ochoa, 2001: 203–205, 208, 209; Acosta, 2002: 176, 177; Ochoa, 2004a: 44, 49, 50, 52, 55, figs. 1, 2, 21, table 1 View TABLE 1 ; Acosta, 2005: 1, 2, 8, 9, 12; Ojanguren Affilastro, 2005: 176, 178,
179, 180, 220, 241; Kamenz and Prendini, 2008: 39, pl. 111, table II; Ojanguren Affilastro et al., 2009: 35–40, figs. 2, 18, 19, 25–35, table 2.
TYPE MATERIAL: ARGENTINA: Mendoza Province: Las Heras Department: 1 ♂, 1 ♀ syntypes (BMNH), Puente del Inca [32 ° 49909.150 S 69 ° 55901.820W, 2721 m]. Cercophonius brachycentrus bivittatus : 1 juv. holotype (NRS), San Juan Province.
NEW RECORDS: ARGENTINA: Mendoza Province: Las Heras Department: Puente del Inca, 32 ° 49.5689 S 69 ° 54.6069 W, 2759 m, 2.xi.2003, J.A. Ochoa, L. Prendini and C.I. Mattoni, alpine vegetation (low spiny bushes) on hard, rocky ground, under stone, 1 juv. (AMNH [LP 2386]). San Juan Province: Calingastra Department: Cerro el Tontal, 31 ° 31924.70 S 69 ° 12923.30W, 3600 m, 25.i. 2006, A. Ojanguren Affilastro, L. Compagnucci and L. Piacentini, 2 juv. (AMNH [LP 5848]); between Paso de Agua Negra and Aduana, vega and surrounds, 30 ° 17933.10 S 69 ° 46945.60W, 4005 m, 27.i.2005, C.I. Mattoni and A. Ojanguren Affilastro, UV sampling, 1 subad. ♂, 1 subad. ♀, 1 juv. ♂ (AMNH [LP 4309]).
DIAGNOSIS: Orobothriurus alticola is similar to O. grismadoi in pigmentation pattern, external morphology, and hemispermatophore. The two species can be separated by the shape of the hemispermatophore: the apex is narrower, and the angle formed by the apex with the rest of the distal lamina smaller in O. grismadoi (fig. 36D, E) than in O. alticola (fig. 36I, J). Males can also be separated by the shape of the telson, which is more slender in O. grismadoi . Additionally, the dorsal surface of the telson vesicle is concave in males of O. grismadoi , whereas it is flat in males of O. alticola (fig. 23A, E). Tergite VII is almost entirely pigmented, without an unpigmented median stripe, in O. grismadoi (fig. 13G), but exhibits paired lateral spots of pigmentation, delimiting an unpigmented median stripe, in O. alticola (fig. 13F). On the other hand, O. alticola can be separated from O. compagnuccii by the shape of the lamina of the hemispermatophore: the apex comprises 52.17 % –54.54 % (n 5 3; mean 5 52.98 %) of the lamina in O. compagnuccii and 40.87 % –46.08 % (n 5 20; mean 5 43.88 %) in O. alticola . Orobothriurus alticola and O. ramirezi can be separated by the distal crest of the hemispermatophore, which is less developed, occupying only half the apex of the lamina, in O. alticola , than in O. ramirezi , in which it occupies almost the entire apex (figs. 36I, J, 47A, B). The telson vesicle of O. alticola is narrower, especially in females (telson length/width ratio: ♂, 2.87–3.21, mean 5 3.07; ♀, 2.44– 2.55, mean 5 2.49; fig. 23A) than that of O. ramirezi (telson length/width ratio: ♂, 2.65– 2.94, mean 5 2.78; ♀, 2.13–2.37, mean 5 2.27; figs. 23G, 24E). The dorsal surface of the femur and ventral surface of the metasoma are less pigmented, with narrower stripes, in O. alticola than O. ramirezi . The metasomal carinae, especially the VL and VSM carinae of segments I and V, and the DL carinae of segment V, are less developed in males of O. alticola than O. ramirezi (fig. 20A, C).
REMARKS: Acosta (2002) transferred Cercophonius brachycentrus bivittatus to Orobothriurus , and subsequently redescribed it as a valid species based on a single male specimen ( Acosta, 2005). Based on an examination of additional material, however, Ojanguren Affilastro et al. (2009) were unable to identify any characters by means of which this species could be consistently separated from O. alticola , and it was therefore synonymized.
DISTRIBUTION: Orobothriurus alticola is endemic to central-western Argentina, from the central part of Mendoza Province (Laguna Diamante) to the central part of San Juan Province (Paso del Agua Negra; fig. 54). It occurs at 2700–4000 m in the Andes (fig. 3B) and nearby El Tontal mountain range of the Precordillera (fig. 3C, Ojanguren Affilastro et al., 2009).
ECOLOGY: The area inhabited by O. alticola belongs to the Puna and the Altoandina phytogeographic provinces ( Cabrera and Willink, 1980). This species was collected in sympatry with another bothriurid, Brachistosternus montanus Roig Alsina, 1977 .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Orobothriurus alticola ( Pocock, 1899 )
Ochoa, José A., Ojanguren Affilastro, Andres A., Mattoni, Camilo I. & Prendini, Lorenzo 2011 |
Orobothriurus bivitattus:
Acosta 2005: 3 - 12 |
Orobothriurus Maury, 1976
MAURY 1976 |
Orobothriurus Maury, 1976
MAURY 1976 |
Orobothriurus alticola
: Maury 1976: 17 - 18 |
Bothriurus (Andibothriurus) alticola: Bücherl et al., 1963: 217
Bucherl 1963: 217 |
Urophonius brachicentrus bivittatus: Mello-Leitão, 1939: 612
Mello-Leitao 1939: 612 |
Urophonius brachycentrus bivittatus: Mello-Leitão 1931: 99–100
Mello-Leitao 1931: 99 - 100 |
Bothriurus alticola
Pocock 1899: 357 - 358 |
bivittatus
Thorell 1877: 183 |
Cercophonius brachycentrus
Thorell 1876 |