Tullgrenella peniaflorensis Galiano, 1970
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5411.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6CA22881-5405-400F-9108-02141164AE47 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10675886 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/081B87C6-FFF7-4C3F-6EAE-5ED3FD2802D9 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Tullgrenella peniaflorensis Galiano, 1970 |
status |
|
Tullgrenella peniaflorensis Galiano, 1970 View in CoL
Figs 4F View FIGURE 4 , 7P View FIGURE 7 , 45A–F View FIGURE 45 , 46A–D View FIGURE 46 , 47A–D View FIGURE 47 , 54A–B View FIGURE 54
Zoobank. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:4ACCE138-D243-4B15-8ACA-2C3770EAA746
Tullgrenella peniaflorensis Galiano, 1970: 342 View in CoL , figs 51, 56 (holotype, female, CHILE, Peñaflor [33°36’23.4”S 70°52’42.3”W], II.1958, M. Toro leg. (MACN-Ar 6242), examined); Richardson, 2010: 45 View Cited Treatment , figs 127–129.
Diagnosis. Males of Tullgrenella peniaflorensis resemble those of T. selenita mainly by the large, longer tegular membranous process higher than the embolar base ( Fig. 46C View FIGURE 46 , see purple arrow) and the slightly sinuous distal cymbium ( Figs 4F View FIGURE 4 , 46C–D View FIGURE 46 vs 48C–D), but can be distinguished by the longer pointed RTA ( Fig. 46D View FIGURE 46 ) and the inclination of the ventral border of the conductor ( Fig. 46C View FIGURE 46 ). Females resemble those of T. selenita by the posteriorly-opening coupling pocket in a horizontal curly-bracket shape ( Figs 7P View FIGURE 7 vs 7Q, 47C–D vs 49C–D) and the ovoid spermathecae ( Figs 7P View FIGURE 7 vs 7Q), but can be distinguished by the ventral septum and the few loops of antero-medial portion of copulatory ducts ( Figs 7P View FIGURE 7 , 47C–D View FIGURE 47 ).
Description. Male (FNAG36 1455). Total length 5.18. Carapace length 2.30; width 1.92; height 1.34. Cephalic region length 1.53. Ocular area length 1.00; Anterior eyes row 1.66 wide; Posterior eyes row 1.78 wide. Distance ALE–PME 0.19; PME–PLE 0.23. Ocular diameter AME 0.42; ALE 0.23; PME 0.08; PLE 0.19. Clypeus height 0.15. Chelicerae, paturon length 1.00; Fang: 0.38 length. Endites length 0.77; 0.44 wide. Labium length 0.42, 0.42 wide. Sternum length 1.11, 0.85 wide. Abdomen length 2.88; 1.74 wide; height 1.69. Length femur I: 1.84; II: 1.54; III: 1.52; IV: 1.86. Patella I: 1.15; II: 0.90; III: 0.73; IV: 0.86. Tibia I: 1.38; II: 0.85; III: 0.81; IV: 1.27. Metatarsus I: 1.13; II: 0.79; III: 1.08; IV: 1.54. Tarsus I: 0.77; II: 0.58; III: 0.58; IV: 0.61. Formula legs: 1432. Palp, length of femur 0.69, patella 0.24, tibia 0.32, cymbium 0.77. Legs macrosetae, femur I–II: d1–1–1, p2di; III: d1–1–1, p2di, r0–1–2di; IV: d1–1–1, p1di, r1di. Patella I–II: p1di; III–IV: p1di, r2di. Tibia I: v2–1–2, p1–1–1; II: p1–0–1; III: v1– 1–2, p1–1–2, r1–0–2; IV: v1–1–2, p1–1–2, r1–1–2. Metatarsus I–II: v0–2–2; III: d1, v0–2–2, p2di, r2di; IV: d2, v0– 2–2, p2di, r2di. Palp macrosetae, femur: d1–1–1. Carapace as in genus ( Figs 45A–F View FIGURE 45 ). Legs dark. Abdomen reddish, with an anterior stripe of white scales ( Figs 45 View FIGURE 45 –FA) and with two circular white spots on the posterior region near to spinnerets ( Fig. 45A View FIGURE 45 ). Spinnerets as in genus ( Figs 46A–B View FIGURE 46 ). Palp, femur with reduced ventral basal protuberance. Tibial retrolateral apophysis sclerotized, acute, not exceeding the ventral tegulum ( Fig. 46D View FIGURE 46 ). Tegulum oblique to cymbium distal apex, longer than wider, C-shaped, with the short proximal retrolateral lobe of tegulum facing down ( Fig. 46C View FIGURE 46 ). Middle tegulum with central depression, with groove ( Fig. 46C View FIGURE 46 , see red arrow). Embolar base projected dorso-prolaterally, tegular membranous process up to embolar base ( Fig. 46C View FIGURE 46 , see purple arrow). Embolus thin, sclerotized, and slightly curved, not exceeding the cymbium apex ( Figs 46C–D View FIGURE 46 ). Projections accompany the embolus, a pars pendula about half of embolus length, a conductor cradle-shaped, about half of embolus length, dorsal, and prolateral to spermophore ( Fig. 46C View FIGURE 46 ).
Female. Described and illustrated by Galiano (1970: 341, 345, figs 51, 56).
Material examined. CHILE, Región de Coquimbo, Elqui, Cerro Grande, La Serena (29°56’37.8”S 71°13’08.2”W), 16.VIII.2003, L. S. Espinoza leg., 1♀ ( FNAG36 1455) GoogleMaps ; Región de Valparaíso, Quilpué [33°02’59.0”S 71°26’28.5”W], 1975, R. Calderón leg., 1♂ ( FNAG36 1078); GoogleMaps ditto, no date, A. Olivares leg. 1♂ ( FNAG36 1463); GoogleMaps Quilpué-Sector Las Rosas [33°04’01.6”S 71°27’02.8”W], no date, A. Olivares leg. 1♂ ( FNAG36 1464) GoogleMaps .
Distribution. Chile [Peñaflor ( Galiano 1970, Richardson 2010), Coquimbo, Región de Valparaíso ( Figs 54A– B View FIGURE 54 )].
Natural history. Found in the North of the Andean region ( Figs 54A–B View FIGURE 54 ). The variation in altitudinal occurrence of this species is 122–388 m a. s. l. ( Figs 54A–B View FIGURE 54 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Salticinae |
Tribe |
Aelurillini |
SubTribe |
Freyina |
Genus |
Tullgrenella peniaflorensis Galiano, 1970
Marta, Kimberly S., Bustamante, Abel A., Hagopián, Damián, Teixeira, Renato A., Brescovit, Antonio D., Valiati, Victor H. & Rodrigues, Everton N. L. 2024 |