Festucula festuculaeformis (Lessert, 1925)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5733/afin.055.0201 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/076987FA-1B32-FFB3-CDD4-3A8BFCD74975 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Festucula festuculaeformis (Lessert, 1925) |
status |
|
Festucula festuculaeformis (Lessert, 1925) View in CoL
Figs 16, 25 View Figs 8–25 , 45–60 View Figs 45–52 View Figs 53–60
Pseudicius festuculaeformis Lessert, 1925: 465 , figs 50—54 (Ô, only first leg, examined)̹
Festucula festuculaeformis: Lessert 1933: 149 View in CoL ; WesoΙowska 1992 (in part): 46, fig̹ 22̹
F. lawrencei View in CoL : WesoΙowska & Russell-Smith 2000 (misidentified): 28, figs 49—51̹
F. festuculaeformis: Wesolowska & Edwards 2012: 746 View in CoL , figs 44—45 (♀) (Misidentification)̹
Diagnosis: F. festuculaeformis resembles F. haddadi sp. n. The male can be distinguished by the shape of its tibial apophysis: VTA is swollen distally (Fig̹ 48) and the LTA is dorsally concave (Fig̹ 49, arrowed), compared to the less swollen VTA (Fig̹ 64) and dorsally straight LTA in F. haddadi sp̹ n̹ (Fig̹ 64, arrowed)̹ The embolus sits at c. 45° to the distal margin of the tegulum in F. festuculaeformis (Fig̹ 45), while the angle is much more acute in F. haddadi sp. n. The female can be distinguished by the structure of the spermathecae, characterised by the long, thin middle part of the insemination ducts (Fig̹ 52)̹
Description:
Male. Measurements: Carapace: 1.80–2.00 long, 1.20–1.30 wide, 0.50 high. Abdomen: 4.40–4.70 long, 1.15–1.20 wide. Eye field: 0.70–0.80 long, anterior 0.90–1.00 wide, posterior 0.95–1.05 wide. Cheliceral length 0.55–0.60. Clypeal height 0.10. Diameter of AME 0.30. Length of leg segments (male from Kenya, NCA 80/99): I 1̹50+1̹15+1̹70+1̹20+0̹45; II 0̹85+0̹40+0̹50+0̹45+0̹35; III 0̹70+0̹35+0̹40+0̹35+0̹35; IV 1̹00+0̹50+0̹75+0̹60+0̹35̹
Leg spination: I: Tb v 0-1-1-1; Mt v 0-2-2ap. III: Mt v 0-1ap.
Coloration ( Figs 53—56 View Figs 53–60 ): Carapace low, flat, dark brown with median brownish-yellow longitudinal stripe, slightly broader in posterior part of ocular area, with two lateral yellow bands, covered with white adpressed hairs. Ocular area black, with brown-yellow patch behind AME̹ Clypeus brown, very low, covered with white hairs (Fig̹ 56)̹ Chelicerae dark brown. Sternum yellow-brown. Abdomen yellowish-grey, with broad brownish stripes laterally (Fig̹ 54)̹ Dorsum with two longitudinal brown and broad yellow stripes (Fig̹ 53)̹ Booklungs and spinnerets brownish̹ Legs I long and robust, brown. The rest of legs yellow. Palps brown. All legs and palps covered with long thin bristles. Palpal structure as in Figs 45–49 View Figs 45–52 .
Female.
Measurements: Carapace: 1.90 long, 1.20 wide, 0.50 high. Abdomen: 6.50 long, 1.50 wide̹ Eye field: 0̹70 long, anterior 0̹95 wide, posterior 1̹00 wide̹ Cheliceral length
0.50. Clypeal height 0.10. Diameter of AME 0.30. Length of leg segments (female from Kenya, NCA 80/99): I 1̹10+0̹80+1̹10+0̹70+0̹40; II 0̹70+0̹40+0̹50+0̹35+0̹30; III 0̹70+0̹35+0̹40+0̹40+0̹35; IV 1̹10+0̹45+0̹80+0̹70+0̹40̹
Leg spination: I: Tb v 0-1-1-1; Mt v 0-2-2ap. IV: Mt v 0-1ap.
Coloration ( Figs 57—60 View Figs 53–60 ): Coloration as in the male ( Figs 57—60 View Figs 53–60 )̹ Structure of epigyne and spermathecae as in Figs 50–52 View Figs 45–52 .
Type material examined: Holotype Ô of Pseudicius festuculaeformis Kibonoto [= TANZANIA, Kilimanjaro, Kibongoto , c. 03°11'S 37°06'E, date unknown (R̹ de Lessert)] ( MHNG)̹ GoogleMaps
Ɵther material examined: KENYA: 3Ô 1♀ Nairobi, L ̹ Nakuru, c. 00°19'S 36°04'E, dead grass Chloris gayana , 19̹xii̹1979, P̹ Reavell ( NCA 80 /99)̹ TANZANIA GoogleMaps : 1Ô 1♀ Mkomazi G ̹R̹, Ibaya camp, sweeping, dry grass, 04°00'S 38°00'E, ii̹1994, A̹ Russell-Smith (MRAC 208025); 1Ô GoogleMaps 1♀ same locality, dry grass on hillside, 03°58'S 37°46'E, 20̹xi̹1994, A̹ Russell-Smith (MRAC 215585)̹ GoogleMaps
Distribution: Eastern Africa ( Kenya, Tanzania) (Fig̹ 26)̹
MHNG |
Museum d'Histoire Naturelle |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Festucula festuculaeformis (Lessert, 1925)
Azarkina, Galina N. & Foord, Stefan H. 2014 |
F. festuculaeformis:
Wesolowska & Edwards 2012: 746 |
Festucula festuculaeformis
: Lessert 1933: 149 |
F. lawrencei
Lessert 1933 |
Pseudicius festuculaeformis
Lessert 1925: 465 |