Rhopalomyia gina Dorchin
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.188745 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6217057 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/074287C9-FFC3-E31F-FF01-FF7559023DAB |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rhopalomyia gina Dorchin |
status |
sp. nov. |
Rhopalomyia gina Dorchin n.sp.
Adult: Antenna with 16–17 flagellomeres in both sexes; last two flagellomeres often partially fused or the apical flagellomere “budding” from the subapical one; necks of male flagellomeres III–VII 0.75–0.82 times as long as nodes ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1 – 8. 1 – 3 ), necks of female flagellomeres III–VII 0.20–0.22 times as long as nodes ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 1 – 8. 1 – 3 ). Palpus 1-segmented, tapering toward apex, with several long setae. Wing length 2.5–3.2 mm in male, 2.2–2.6 mm in female, covered by dark, hair-like scales. Claws untoothed, empodia longer than claws ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1 – 8. 1 – 3 ). Male abdomen: tergites 1–7 with posterior row of setae, band of setae mesally, a pair of anterior trichoid sensilla, and evenly covered by dark, hair-like scales. Tergite 8 with fewer long setae. Sternites weakly sclerotized, with posterior and mesal groups of setae and pair of adjacent trichoid sensilla anteriorly. Male terminalia ( Figs. 18–19 View FIGURES 9 – 19 ): gonocoxite cylindrical, setose and setulose, with prominent, strongly setose and sclerotized mediobasal lobe bearing several setose apical papillae; gonocoxal apodeme bilobed; gonostylus cylindrical, setose and setulose throughout, with small brush-like tooth; aedeagus wide, cylindrical; hypoproct with very shallow notch, or entire in some individuals, evenly setulose; cerci separated by deep notch, setose and setulose. Female abdomen (Fig. 33): tergites 1–7 with posterior row of setae, several scattered long setae elsewhere, and evenly covered by dark scales; tergite 8 Y-shaped, wide and short, with few long setae; all tergites with two anterior trichoid sensilla. Sternites very weakly sclerotized or completely unsclerotized, with long setae mesally and a pair of adjacent trichoid sensilla anteriorly; ovipositor 4.1–5.5 times as long as tergite 7; cerci fused into single cylindrical lamella, setose and setulose ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 1 – 8. 1 – 3 ); hypoproct rounded apically, strongly setose and setulose.
Pupa ( Figs. 46–47 View FIGURES 40 – 47 ): Light orange. Antennal bases developed into tapering, anteriorly pointed horns with a longitudinal fold-like groove closer to lateral than to median edge of horn. Posterior margins of antennal bases rounded in frontal view. Frons without median projections or ridges, with pronounced lateral projections, posterior edge with a V-shaped extension in frontal view. Cephalic seta short. Abdominal segments dorsally and laterally with pointed spicules. Terminal abdominal segment divided longitudinally into two lobes.
Type material: Rhopalomyia gina Dorchin. Holotype: male, USA, Mauses Creek, PA, 30/V/2008, C. Blair, ex. leaf gall on S. juncea , deposited in USNM. Paratypes: All from USA, PA, Mauses Creek, collected and reared from leaf galls on S. juncea . 2 pupae, 7/VI/2007, G. Lee; 2 males, 20/V/2008, C. Blair; 2 females, 1 male, 23/V/2008, C. Blair; 5 females, 2 males, 26/V/2008, C. Blair; 8 females, 6 males, 30/V/ 2008; 2 pupae, 11/VI/2008, C. Blair.
Etymology: The species is named after Gina Lee, who discovered the galls in June of 2007 during her undergraduate summer internship at Bucknell University. The name is a noun in apposition.
Host: Solidago juncea
Gall and biology: Galls of this species ( Fig. 68 View FIGURES 62 – 69 ) are similar in appearance to galls of R. clarkei on S. rugosa ( Figs. 62–64 View FIGURES 62 – 69 ) and of its close relative on S. gigantea ( Fig. 67 View FIGURES 62 – 69 ). They are 2.8–5.0 mm long and 0.6–1.3 mm wide at widest part (n=22), smooth and green, often with purplish longitudinal lines and tip, and are most often found on the upper side of leaves. The position of the gall is usually apparent on the other side of the leaf only as a small scar, but some galls had a long, curly appendage extending from that side ( Fig. 69 View FIGURES 62 – 69 ). Galls were found in mid May to mid June and adult emergence began in early June, with a sex ratio of 2: 1 in favor of females. The galls were heavily attacked by ectoparasitoids (65% parasitism in 2007, n=22 galls), but in May 2008 the parasitism rate was only 12% (n= 41 galls). Further examination of the plants in early August failed to reveal any galls, but Gagné (1989 and pers. com.) found similar galls in late September on leaves subtending and composing the rosette galls of Asphondylia monacha on S. juncea in Silver Spring, MD. It therefore appears that this species completes at least two generations per year.
Remarks: This species is similar to R. clarkei and R. inquisitor in the morphology of adults and galls, but tergite 8 of the female abdomen is considerably wider and shorter in R. gina (Fig. 33), and the male gonopods are more slender and therefore resemble those of the three Rhopalomyia species from Euthamia ( R. fusiformae , R. lobata , and R. pedicellata ). All of these species share the one-segmented palpus, presence of necks in the female flagellomeres, and two-armed gonocoxal apodeme in the male. The pupa of R. gina differs from that of R. clarkei in having lateral projections of the frons, which are also present in R. lobata , and is unique for the longitudinal groove along the antennal bases.
USNM |
Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |