Hispanodorcas cf. orientalis Bouvrain and Bonis, 1988
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.4202/app.2011.0013 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/060F2E7D-8F7D-7B63-032B-D4E2FA3E9560 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Hispanodorcas cf. orientalis Bouvrain and Bonis, 1988 |
status |
|
Hispanodorcas cf. orientalis Bouvrain and Bonis, 1988
Fig. 3 View Fig .
1996 Oioceros cf. atropatenes (partim); Kostopoulos and Koufos 1996: 279, pl. 4.
1996? Gazella sp. ; Kostopoulos and Koufos1996: 278, pl. 3: e, f.
Material.—Partial braincase with left horncore, LGPUT NKT−227; frontlet, LGPUT NKT−118, 228; proximal part of right horncore, LGPUT NKT−231; distal part of left horncore, LGPUT NKT−232; part of left mandibular ramus with p3–m3, LGPUT NKT−250. All specimens are from the primate−bearing locality of Nikiti−1, located in the upper part of the Nikiti Formation (Vallesian, MN10; Koufos 2006) exposed on the Chalkidiki Peninsula, northern Greece ( Koufos et al. 1991).
Description.—The width of the braincase ( LGPUT NKT−227; Fig. 3B View Fig ) behind the horncores is 57.6 mm, very similar to that of the holotype of H. orientalis (56.9 mm). The frontals are strongly flexed between the horncores ( Fig. 3B View Fig ), indicating either that the face was significantly inclined compared to the braincase (but less so than in H. orientalis ; Bouvrain and Bonis 1988: 101), or that the area between the nasals and the pedicles was strongly depressed, as also seen in Oioceros (e.g., Roussiakis 2003). The postcornual fossa of the Nikiti−1 taxon varies in size and is positioned laterally, as in H. orientalis . The homonymously twisted horncores are inserted above the orbits, located far apart from each other, weakly inclined, and curved backwards ( Fig. 3B View Fig ). While being almost parallel at the base, they are strongly divergent distally. In cross section, the horncore is elliptical to semicircular in outline, and strongly compressed transversely ( Fig. 1 View Fig ), with the greater basal axis forming a moderately large angle with the sagittal plane. The medial surface of the proximal horncore is strongly convex, whereas the lateral surface is flattened, but barely depressed ( Fig. 3A View Fig ). However, towards the tip, the flattened lateral surface gives rise to a deep furrow dividing the horncore into a thin and long anterior and a wide and short posterior part ( LGPUT NKT−232; Fig. 3C View Fig ). A narrow groove opening towards (but not extending on to) the pedicle is present on the proximal lateral surface of some specimens ( LGPUT NKT−118, 228). A moderately developed, anteromedially descending anterior keel occurs in LGPUT NKT−231 and 227, while a deep posterior furrow appears in LGPUT NKT−232, thus resembling both H. torrubiae and H. orientalis .
The length of the lower molar row is 34.3 mm. The lower molars lack goat folds, and a strong parastylid and well−defined metastylid occur on m2 and m3. The ribs of the metaconid and the entoconid are well developed lingually. A basal pillar is present only on m1. On p4, the parastylid is weakly separated from the paraconid, while the metaconid curves distally and fuses with the posterior stylid (entoconid + entostylid). On p3, the metaconid is directed posteriorly, but otherwise p3 is similar to p4.
Remarks.— Kostopoulos and Koufos (1996) mistakenly referred the material from Nikiti−1 to? Gazella sp. or Oioceros cf. atropatenes . It is now evident that the specimens from Nikiti−1 represent Hispanodorcas , even though some additional dental material from the same site ( LGPUT NKT229, 230, 102; Kostopoulos and Koufos 1996: 29) belongs to another, slightly larger, as yet unidentified bovid. Apart from some minor morphological differences, which may be attributed to its older age, the Nikiti− 1 specimen of Hispanodorcas is strikingly similar to H. orientalis from Dytiko−3.
LGPUT |
Laboratory of Geology and Palaeontology |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Hispanodorcas cf. orientalis Bouvrain and Bonis, 1988
Kostopoulos, Dimitris S. 2014 |
Oioceros cf. atropatenes
Kostopoulos, D. S. & Koufos, G. D. 1996: 279 |