Hexactinellida, Schmidt, 1870

Botting, Joseph P. & Muir, Lucy A., 2014, First post-Cambrian records of the reticulosan sponges Valospongia and Hintzespongia from the late Tremadocian of North Wales, Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 59 (1), pp. 241-252 : 244-248

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.4202/app.2012.0016

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/05043822-FFDF-FFE3-D53F-115DFF531459

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Hexactinellida
status

 

Class Hexactinellida View in CoL ? Schmidt, 1870

Discussion.—Although traditionally classed as hexactinellids, the relationships of many Cambrian–Ordovician hexactine-bearing sponges are now recognised to be unclear, and they may instead represent stem-group hexactinellids or stem-group siliceans. The common ancestor of Silicea + Calcarea is likely to have had hexactinellid-like spicules Botting and Butterfield 2005), and so it is potentially difficult to distinguish true hexactinellids from basal and stem-group sponges. A full discussion of this is beyond the scope of the paper, but we draw attention to the uncertainty as a matter of accuracy.

Family uncertain

Remarks.—The higher-level classification of complex reticulosans has not yet been fully established. Although several superfamilies and families have been erected (see Finks and Rigby 2004b), these relate only to a few structurally distinct architectures, but even these as currently defined are inconsistent. Valospongia was classified by Rigby et al. (2010) as a hydnodictyid dierespongioid. The Hydnodictyidae were defined ( Finks and Rigby 2004b) as possessing two nonaligned layers of hexactine-based spicules, each organised in parallel arrays. Their diagnosis of the Dierespongioidea expresses similar concepts, but excludes taxa bearing parietal gaps. Not only are such gaps present in the inner layer of Valospongia , but the prominent protuberances are not seen in other taxa in the family. It is also unclear whether the simple presence or absence of multiple skeletal layers with a degree of regularity is sufficient to define groupings on this level, and to what extent it is convergent. We therefore leave the genus in uncertain familial and superfamilial taxonomic position pending a better understanding of early complex reticulosans.

Genus Valospongia Rigby, 1983

Type species: Valospongia gigantis Rigby, 1983 , from the lower part of the middle Cambrian Marjum Formation of Utah, USA .

Species included: Valospongia gigantis Rigby, 1983 ; Valospongia bufo sp. nov.

Emended diagnosis.—Barrel-shaped to vasiform sponges with a complex skeleton composed of at least two layers; continuous inner layer or layers of semi-quadruled, semi-regular hexactines or their derivatives combining to form orthogonal and diagonal elements, and outer layer of similar spicules that is extended into prominent tubercles covered by a fine reticulation, which may or may not be spicular; prominent spicular strands developed in some species.

Remrks.— Valospongia is a complex sponge (see diagnosis of Finks and Rigby 2004b), with several apparently unique features, and the diagnosis has been reclarified here in light of the new material. It is unclear whether the two inner layers recognised by Finks and Rigby (2004b) are separate, or whether they form one layer with combined orthogonal and diagonal elements; the two series sometimes do appear distinct, however, and are treated as such here. The nature of the skeletal strands emphasized by Finks and Rigby (2004b) is unclear, but they may represent fusion or close overlapping of elongated spicule rays. The apparent parietal gaps are seen in the new material to reflect abrupt curvature of the wall into the mounds, which appear to be covered by a reticulate meshwork of small hexactine-based spicules in irregular arrangement, but it is possible instead that it represents soft tissues replaced by pyrite (or soft tissues supported by microscleres). The arrangement in these meshworks is not orthogonal, and the lines are irregular and perhaps curved, suggesting a non-spicular origin; it is possible that they were composed of similar material to that of Vauxia (e.g., Rigby 1986).

Despite superficial similarity in appearance of the sponge, there is certainly no dermal quadruled grid as seen in Hintzespongia and allies; however, neither is there any obvious reason to assign the genus to the Hydnodictyidae (cf. Finks and Rigby 2004b), representatives of which appear to have possessed neither the multiple layers of Valospongia , nor the meshwork-covered mounds. For these reasons, we prefer to leave the family-level assignment of Valospongia open. We include the new species within Valospongia , as although it does not appear to possess the skeletal strands of V. gigantis Rigby, 1983 , the remaining structure conforms closely to the type material.

Stratigraphic and geographic range.— Currently confirmed only from the middle Cambrian of Utah, USA and the Early Ordovician of Wales, UK.

Valospongia bufo sp. nov.

Fig. 4.

Etymology: From Latin bufo , toad, in appreciation of the pronounced wart-like mounds all over the dermal surface.

Type material: Holotype: NIGP154629 View Materials a near-complete specimen showing both skeletal layers . Paratypes: 8 specimens, NIGP154630 View Materials to NIGP154637 View Materials . NIGP154630 View Materials a partial, three-dimensional specimen showing outer layer and poorly preserved spiculation from inner layer in some areas; from loose but local block at Amnodd Wen; NIGP154631 View Materials , a near-complete but weathered specimen found as a loose block beside the track near Amnodd Wen, 100 m up the track towards Ceunant-y-garreg-ddu; NIGP 154632 View Materials , a partial specimen from Ceunant-y-garreg-ddu approximately 39 m stratigraphically up in the section from where the stream crosses the path; NIGP154633 View Materials , a small mesh fragment mostly preserving parietal outer layer, and weak spicule preservation from Ceunant-y-garreg-ddu, approximately 18 m stratigraphically up in the section from where the stream crosses the path; NIGP154634 View Materials , three partial specimens on a loose block from Ceunant-y-garreg-ddu, including profile of margin with protruding mounds; NIGP154635 View Materials , loose block with two partial specimens, from Ceunant-y-garreg-ddu; NIGP154636 View Materials , loose block with three partial specimens, from Ceunant-y-garreg-ddu; NIGP154637 View Materials , near-complete specimen with three-dimensional preservation of the skeletal mesh but weak spicule preservation, from loose but local block at Amnodd Wen; age for all specimens as for holotype .

Type locality: Ceunant-y-garreg-ddu stream section, found as a loose block below outcrops 40 m stratigraphically above the point where it crossed the track (SH 82103600).

Type horizon: Late Tremadocian (early Migneintian).

Diagnosis.—Relatively small Valospongia without obvious skeletal strands; walls between parietal gaps in outer layer narrow (less than half diameter of gaps); inner layer(s) of orthogonal and diagonal reticulation densely arranged and sub-regularly quadruled; spicules small relative to parietal gap size.

Description.—Rounded, roughly barrel-shaped sponge body (Fig. 4A 1, B, C 1). Holotype (Fig. 4C) 31 mm wide and over 40 mm tall (estimated height c. 45 mm), with other specimens of comparable size. Base broadly rounded. Oscular margin is flat, nearly as wide as widest point of sponge, and slightly irregular.Appearently no distinct marginalia, but very short (0.3–0.4 mm) spicule rays project subvertically from the edge. Weakly-preserved, slightly longer (less than 1 mm) spicule rays also project laterally from the body wall, but do not constitute discrete prostalia.

Body wall consists of a tuberculate primary (outer, probably dermal) layer, and a thin inner (probably gastral) spicule layer. Primary skeletal wall layer with acute rounded mounds (Fig. 4A 1, B, D 1) that penetrate into the matrix, giving the appearance of numerous subcircular spaces, typically 2 mm in diameter (clearest in Fig. 4A 1, A 2) but proportionally smaller in small specimens (around 1 mm in the 18-mm tall NIGP 154634; Fig. 4D 1). Some smaller spaces are interspersed irregularly with the larger ones, and occasionally a large gap is subdivided by an additional curving wall (Fig. 4C 4, at right edge), typically leaving one half smaller and with a concave side. At the upper margin of the sponge, these gaps are less clearly defined and smaller, around 1 mm in diameter. Mounds form a disordered array, roughly closepacked, and with skeletal areas between gaps normally 0.5 mm wide at thinnest, widening slightly in triple-junctions but in general maintaining constant thickness (although dependent on degree of compression of specimens); this produces slightly polygonal, rounded spaces rather than strictly circular apertures. The inter-mound areas may be proportionally wider at earlier growth stages, but too few small specimens are available for confirmation.

Mounds, where visible in profile (Fig. 4B, D 1) at the sponge margin, can be up to 2 mm tall in large specimens, and normally around 2 mm wide; this accords with the diameter of spaces described above, indicating that the skeletal wall of the mounds was of negligible thickness. Mounds in early growth stages are proportionally smaller, and perhaps disproportionately shorter relative to diameter (Fig. 4D 1). Mounds are covered with a similar irregular mesh (Fig. 4D 2) to that seen in the body wall near the oscular margin, although nowhere preserved clearly enough to confirm the presence of discrete spicules. Where broken through the domes, the internal section is often preserved with a thin reflective film (Fig. 4D 1), presumed to be composed of aluminosilicates, but fainter than in the skeletal wall. In many of the larger gaps, this surface is slightly domed, with subradial and concentric wrinkles (Fig. 4C 4). This indicates the presence of a thin soft-tissue membrane covering the interior of mounds in life, creating an enclosed space within the mounds.

Spiculation of the outer wall is normally obscured by substantial pyritisation, particularly at the margins of parietal gaps, but individual spicules are visible in places (Fig. 4C 4). Where pyritisation is less extensive, the skeleton is covered by a thin reflective sheet of probable aluminosilicates. Spicules appear to be simple stauractines, although additional gastral or dermal rays cannot be excluded. Rays are straight and simple.

The largest spicules in the primary skeletal layer are centred in the centres of wall areas between parietal gaps, with the largest spicule identified having ray length 1.2 mm (basal ray diameter approx. 0.1 mm, possibly taphonomically enlarged); orientation is irregular. Smaller spicules are distributed largely irregularly except at parietal gap margins, where they are often arranged with rays parallel to the margin, such that one ray projects towards the centre of the gap (Fig. 4C 4). Typical ray length for smaller spicules is c. 0.2 mm. Near oscular margin, the spicules are arranged to form an irregular polygonal meshwork, oriented roughly diagonal to the sponge axis with spaces approximately 0.1 mm across (Fig. 4C

3

).

Inner layer (possibly layers) composed of locally dense felt of small, fine hexactines or their derivatives in parallel, perhaps quadruled array. Traces of discrete orthogonal and diagonal spicule series, superimposed onto each other, and visible in the holotype (Fig. 4C 2); the paratype NIGP154631 View Materials (Fig. 4B) also shows a small area at the upper right corner with the orthogonal grid visible. The best-preserved regions in the holotype show an apparently regular grid with square spaces consistently around 0.1 mm per side .

No evidence for basalia is seen in any specimen.

Discussion.—If the structure of the sponge is well preserved, as reconstructed in Fig. 5 View Fig , recognition of the species is straightforward. Separating the species from other known parietal gap-bearing taxa is difficult if the preservation does not show clear spiculation of the inner layer(s) or the skeletal structure of the mounds, but several features are useful. The parietal gap size appears to be tied consistently to body size, and is larger than that in co-occurring taxa. The near-circular, slightly polygonal form of the gaps, arrangement into locally clear transverse rows, and the occasional division of a large gap by a curving wall, are also characteristic. The narrowness of the walls between the gaps produces a relatively high proportion of space in this layer. Where spiculation is visible, the irregularity of the orthogonal and diagonal layers contrasts with that in Hintzespongia Rigby and Gutschick, 1976 , in which the regular layer is external to the layer with parietal gaps (supported by Rigby 1983). In specimens from Amnodd Wen, the walls are typically preserved with mounds in three dimensions, allowing easy separation from Hintzespongia -like forms; the same distinction is visible at the margin of flattened, complete specimens, where mounds are visible in profile.

The new species is distinctly separated from Valospongia gigantis Rigby, 1983 by the lack of spicular strands, the denser packing of the parietal gaps, and perhaps also by the expression of the dermal spiculation over areas outside the mound surfaces; the holotype of the type species shows the fine-scale reticulation only over the mound surface rather than also within the inter-pariety wall region as seen in V. bufo sp. nov. The type species is also an order of magnitude larger than any specimen in the present collection, and with disproportionately larger spicules, although it is possible that the proportions of a juvenile V. gigantis would be similar to those of V. bufo . Other parietal gap-bearing taxa from the Burgess Shale-type faunas include Stephenospongia Rigby, 1986 , which is known from fragments only; this species is assigned to the Hintzespongiidae ( Finks and Rigby 2004b) ,

Fig. 4. The hexactine-bearing sponge Valospongia bufo sp. nov. Dol-cyn-Afon Formation , upper Tremadocian , Lower Ordovician , Arenig Fawr, North Wales, UK. A. Paratype NIGP154637 View Materials from loose but local block at Amnodd Wen. A 1, overall view of specimen in incomplete margin but good preservation of mound array (low-angle illumination); A 2, detail showing bases of mounds with three-dimensional preservation, walls curving upwards until cut off by plane of breakage (intense oronge colouration composed of weathered framboidal pyrite). B. Paratype NIGP154631 View Materials , complete but weathered specimen showing general form and profile of mounds (arrowed) at right margin; block found beside the track near Amnodd Wen, 100 m up the track towards Ceunant-y-garreg-ddu (high-angle illumination). C. Holotype NIGP154629 View Materials , Ceunant-y-garreg-ddu stream section, found as a loose block below outcrops 40 m stratigraphically above the point where it crossed the track. C 1, overall view showing near-complete outline and broad, flat oscular margin; C 2, detail of skeleton, showing dense semi-regular inner spicule grid including semi-quadruled array; C 3, detail of spicules at oscular margin, showing loss of pronounced mounds and irregular, sub-polygonal diagonal organisation; C 4, detail of outer skeletal layer, with clear mound bases and showing wrinkled internal with radiating spicule rays projecting inwards towards centre (right middle). D. Paratype NIGP154634 View Materials from Ceunant-y-garreg-ddu. D 1, left lateral margin, showing well-preserved arrangement of mound bases, moderate spiculation, and several dermal mounds in cross section; D 2, detail of single mound, showing reticulate mesh over flattened mound surface (contrast significantly enhanced). Scale bars A, B, C 1, 10 mm; C 2 –C 4, D 1, D 2, 1 mm. All photographs taken under water .

but may also show a reticulating grid over the parietal gaps, as in Valospongia . It can nonetheless be distinguished by its elongate parietal gaps, by the large size of the spicules relative to the parietal gaps, and by the lack of a regularly ordered grid. The allied Ratcliffespongia Rigby, 1969 is a difficult genus; the type species, R. perforata Rigby, 1969 , appears to have possessed only a single wall of spicules in an irregular array, and with transversely-elongated parietal gaps. Neither this nor the Chinese species R. multiforamina Wu, Yang, Janussen, Steiner, and Zhu, 2005 shows the reticulation-covered mounds or the regularly-oriented inner layer(s) of Valospongia . Ratcliffespongia wheeleri Rigby and Church, 1990 is discussed below, where we reassign it to Hintzespongia .

Stratigraphic and geographic range.—Known only from several sites within the upper part of the Dol-cyn-Afon Formation ( Conophrys salopiensis Biozone ; early Migneintian, Late Tremadocian) of the Arenig Fawr area, near Bala, Wales, UK.

NIGP

Naking Institute of Geology and Palaeontology

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Porifera

Class

Hexactinellida

Loc

Hexactinellida

Botting, Joseph P. & Muir, Lucy A. 2014
2014
Loc

Valospongia

Rigby 1983
1983
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF