Branchinella raptor
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.6620/ZS.2020.59-14 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FF6411-FFE7-1F49-17A8-FBFEFBFA2992 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Branchinella raptor |
status |
|
“ raptor ” species group
Diagnosis: Eyes reduced; male second antennae elongate, arcuate and subacute; female second antennae lacking a medial spine; body covered in sensory papillae; female thoracic segments lacking any dorsolateral projections; anterior most limbs longest; ovaries uniramal limited to the abdomen; brood pouch pyriform, extending to abdominal segment III; testes uniramal extending posteriorly from genital segments into abdominal segment VI; cercopods elongate, nearly as long as the abdomen, cylindrical, tapering, and glabrous. All other anostracans have the first and last limb pairs smaller than the middle pairs. This species is only known from habitats with a substrate salinity of 5 mS/cm and containing 25% calcium carbonate ( Rogers 2014a).
Comments: Branchinecta raptor shares several important character states with the ferox group (see comments under the ferox group below) and with Branchinecta gigas in the gigas group. Both B. raptor and B. gigas are specialized predators. Both species are super giants among anostracans (growing over 100 mm), have dramatically reduced eyes, bodies covered in sensory papillae that are used to detect movement in water by potential prey items, and elongated, whip like cercopods ( Rogers et al. 2006). The significance of these characters must needs be examined, especially as they do not appear in any other anostracan. These characters may suggest a stronger relationship than was elucidated by our genetic analyses.
Species attributed
Branchinecta raptor Rogers, Quinney, Weaver & Olesen, 2006 View in CoL
“Southern” species group
Diagnosis: (Limited) Eyes normal; male second antennae subcylindrical and highly variable; female second antennae lacking a medial spine; body lacking sensory papillae; female thoracic segments variously ornamented; first and last limb pairs shortest; ovaries biramal or uniramal; brood pouch variable; testes uniramal, limited to the abdomen; cercopods, fringed with setae, flattened and shorter than last two abdominal segments.
Comments: This group is not defined at this time, and is poorly resolved genetically and morphologically. Only two species from the southern hemisphere were available for molecular study and eleven were studied morphologically. The two species we analysed genetically grouped separately from the remaining members of the genus, regardless of their great morphological variety. While it is possible that all southern species belong to a single clade, we expect that once more taxa are available for study, other monophyletic groups will be revealed. The limited resolution we have now suggests that it is possible that the southern hemisphere species are the result of radical differentiation from a single, stochastic colonization event from North America. The species examined morphologically all share the basic form of the teste (uniramal, limited to the abdomen), and the cercopods. However, with as few taxa as we have for molecular analysis at this time, it is only considered a possibility.
Species attributed
Branchinecta achalensis César, 1985 View in CoL (sensu Cohen, 1987)
= Branchinecta uruguayensis Rogers and Lorenz, 2015 View in CoL Branchinecta brushi Hegna & Lazo-Wasem, 2010 View in CoL Branchinecta ferrolimneta Rogers & Ferreira, 2007 View in CoL Branchinecta fueguina Cohen, 2008 View in CoL Branchinecta gaini Daday, 1910 View in CoL Branchinecta granulosa Daday, 1902 View in CoL (sensu Cohen, 1992, 1995)
= Branchinecta santacrucensis César, 1987a View in CoL (fide Cohen, 1992) Branchinecta iheringi Lilljeborg, 1889 View in CoL (sensu Cohen, 1993, 1995b) Branchinecta leonensis César, 1987b View in CoL Branchinecta palustris Biraben, 1946 View in CoL (sensu Cohen, 1981) Branchinecta papillata Rogers View in CoL , de los Rios, & Zuniga, 2008 (sensu
Cohen, 2012) Branchinecta papillosa Biraben, 1946 View in CoL Branchinecta prima Cohen, 1983 View in CoL
Branchinecta roacensis Cohen, 1982 View in CoL
Branchinecta somuncurensis Cohen, 1983 View in CoL
Branchinecta tarensis Birabén, 1946 View in CoL
Branchinecta tolli ( Sars, 1897) View in CoL (sensu Vekhoff, 1989)
= Branchiopsyllus tolli Sars, 1897 View in CoL
= Artemiella skorikowi Daday, 1910 View in CoL
= Branchinecta skorikowi ( Daday, 1910) View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Branchinella raptor
Rogers, D. Christopher & Aguilar, Andres 2020 |
Branchinecta uruguayensis
Rogers and Lorenz 2015 |
Branchinecta brushi
Hegna & Lazo-Wasem 2010 |
Branchinecta fueguina
Cohen 2008 |
Branchinecta ferrolimneta
Rogers & Ferreira 2007 |
Branchinecta raptor
Rogers, Quinney, Weaver & Olesen 2006 |
Branchinecta santacrucensis César, 1987a
Cesar 1987 |
Branchinecta leonensis César, 1987b
Cesar 1987 |
Branchinecta achalensis César, 1985
Cesar 1985 |
Branchinecta vuriloche
Cohen 1985 |
Branchinecta prima
Cohen 1983 |
Branchinecta somuncurensis
Cohen 1983 |
Branchinecta roacensis
Cohen 1982 |
Branchinecta valchetana
Cohen 1981 |
Branchinecta palustris
Biraben 1946 |
Branchinecta papillosa
Biraben 1946 |
Branchinecta tarensis Birabén, 1946
Biraben 1946 |
Branchinecta gaini
Daday 1910 |
Artemiella skorikowi
Daday 1910 |
Branchinecta granulosa
Daday 1902 |
Branchiopsyllus tolli
Sars 1897 |
Branchinecta iheringi
Lilljeborg 1889 |