Canrightia sp.
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.37520/fi.2022.016 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7535308 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FD87F2-FFF5-FFE6-FECF-FD99C12DF9BB |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Canrightia sp. |
status |
|
Text-fig. 5a, b View Text-fig
Description and remarks. A single isolated seed that closely resembles isolated seeds of Canrightia foveolata in general morphology (above) is not assigned to any of the species of Canrightia . The seed is broadly elliptical in shape, about 1.05 mm long and 0.75 mm wide, with a slightly pointed micropylar region and a rounded chalazal region. One face is flattened and the opposite face is slightly convex ( Text-fig. 5a View Text-fig ). The chalaza protrudes slightly towards the flattened face ( Text-fig. 5a View Text-fig ). The flattened surface suggests that the seed is from a two-seeded fruit similar to that of Canrightia foveolata . The outer tissues of the seed coat and fruit wall are abraded and the exposed part of the seed is the hard, finely crystalliferous, endotesta. The surface of the endotesta is pitted with many larger pits arranged in about 20 shallow, longitudinal rows and also by smaller cavities formed by angular crystals ( Text-fig. 5a, b View Text-fig ). There is no information on internal features.
Affinity and other occurrences. The seed is assigned to Canrightia based on its close similarity to C. foveolata . Both have one flattened face, prominent pits arranged in longitudinal rows on the outer surface, and a distinctly crystalliferous endotesta. However, the seed of Canrightia sp. is larger than that of C. foveolata and also has the pits arranged in fewer longitudinal rows (about 20 in Canrightia sp. compared to more than 30 in C. foveolata ). Similar seeds have not yet been encountered in other Early Cretaceous mesofossil floras from Portugal.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |