Sphericula, Wesołowska & Russell-Smith, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2022.841.1943 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A1A437F5-095C-43F7-BC18-66D53640F30E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195536 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/BE4B82A0-CC6A-4637-AD7C-DCCA92141078 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:BE4B82A0-CC6A-4637-AD7C-DCCA92141078 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Sphericula |
status |
gen. nov. |
Genus Sphericula View in CoL gen. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:BE4B82A0-CC6A-4637-AD7C-DCCA92141078
Type species
Sphericula globulifera gen. et sp. nov.
Etymology
The generic name is derived from the Latin word ‘ sphera ’, meaning ‘ball’, and refers to the habitus of the type species. Gender feminine.
Diagnosis and affinities
A very small spider, approximately 1.5 mm length. Both the carapace and abdomen are very convex, almost spherical. The structure of the female genitalia is similar to that of the genus Tanzania Koçak & Kemal, 2008 ( Wesołowska & Russell-Smith 2000) and some Euophrys spp. , but the form of the body is different. Both Tanzania and Euophrys C.L. Koch, 1834 have an almost flat carapace gently sloping backwards, while in Sphericula gen. nov. the carapace is very high and highest at the posterior row of eyes, abruptly sloping just behind the eye field. The abdomen in Sphericula is also high, its width is equal to its length, whereas the members of the other two genera have the abdomen oval and not convex. The epigyne is relatively large, and the seminal ducts seen through the integument are short and wide versus thin in the other genera. The general colour of Sphericula is pale.
The relationships of Sphericula gen. nov. are unclear and demand an examination of the male.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.