Capsaloides sinuatus ( Goto, 1894 ) Price, 1938

Chisholm, Leslie A. & Whittington, Ian D., 2006, Revision of Capsaloides (Monogenea: Capsalidae) with a redescription of C. magnaspinosus Price, 1939 from the nasal tissue of Tetrapterus audax (Istiophoridae) collected off Nelson Bay, New South Wales, Australia, Zootaxa 1160, pp. 1-20 : 17

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.172308

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6255203

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FC8787-E17B-FFD4-FED3-FEEA9C7DF9F6

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Capsaloides sinuatus ( Goto, 1894 ) Price, 1938
status

 

Capsaloides sinuatus ( Goto, 1894) Price, 1938 View in CoL ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 G)

Synonyms: Tristomum sinuatum Goto, 1894 ; Capsala sinuata ( Goto, 1894) Johnston, 1929 ; Capsaloides sinuatum ( Goto, 1894) Price, 1938 .

Type­host: Histiophorus sp. ( Istiophoridae ). Goto (1894) lists the Japanese name “kajiki” as the host of C. sinuatus . Lawler (1981) noted that with this Japanese name, the host is likely now known as Istiophorus platypterus .

Type­locality: Misaki, Japan [Pacific Ocean].

Site: Inner side of gills.

Additional record: Gills of Tetrapterus audax (Philippi, 1887) , Hawaii, USA [Pacific Ocean] (see Yamaguti 1968).

Specimens examined: Two voucher specimens (CNHE 002739).

Remarks

We were unable to locate type­material to verify the original description or the 5 specimens upon which the redescription was based (see Yamaguti 1968). The haptoral accessory sclerite ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 G; redrawn from Goto 1894) does not appear to be completely in profile in a flattened dorsoventral orientation. Goto (1894) described the uterus as opening into the “genital atrium” near the common genital pore but Yamaguti (1968) depicted the uterus as having a separate aperture. Goto (1894) based his description on careful observations of whole and sectioned material. Furthermore, in all other species of Capsaloides , the uterus joins the male copulatory organ canal just before the common genital pore. Therefore, it is likely that Yamaguti’s depiction of a separate uterine aperture is incorrect.

We examined 2 voucher specimens identified by Lamothe­Argumedo as C. sinuatus . These worms were collected from the gills of T. audax caught off Mazatlan, Mexico. We cannot distinguish these apparent C. sinuatus specimens from the holotype of C. cristatus . The dorsomarginal body sclerites of the 2 voucher specimens are identical to C. cristatus . Of particular note is the presence of the left anterior isolated group of dorsomarginal body sclerites (6–7 isolated sclerites with 6–10 cusps) in the 2 voucher specimens which was not described for C. sinuatus by Goto (1894). If these voucher specimens are indeed C. sinuatus , this provides further support for the synonymy of C. cristatus with C. sinuatus . However, until type­material is located or additional specimens from the type­locality are collected, we choose not to make this decision.

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF