Prismognathus siniaevi Ikeda, 1997
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.280626 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6179480 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FBD04A-FFCF-6010-FF05-46E5B348FB0E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Prismognathus siniaevi Ikeda, 1997 |
status |
|
Prismognathus siniaevi Ikeda, 1997 View in CoL
( Figs. 25–26, 34 View FIGURES 21 – 34 , 73–74, 76 View FIGURES 73 – 78 , 131 View FIGURES 111 – 131 , 164–165 View FIGURES 150 – 167 , 185 View FIGURES 168 – 199 , 221 View FIGURES 212 – 223 , 235 View FIGURE 235 )
Prismognathus siniaevi Ikeda 1997: 29 View in CoL [type locality: Sapa, northern Vietnam], Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 20 , male holotype; Fujita 2010: 165, plate 99, Figs. 493 (1–3), males and female, from northern Vietnam.
Prismognathus siniaevi rattakiti Nagai, 2005: 32 View in CoL [type locality: Chudo Razi, northeastern Kachin, northern Myanmar], Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 20 , male holotype; Fujita 2010: 165, plate 99, Fig. 493-4, holotype male. Questionable subspecies.
Material examined. CHINA: Yunnan: 1 3, 2 ƤƤ, Nujiang, Gongshan County, Qiqi station of the nature reserve, 1900m, VII.2010, X.-D. Yang & W.-X. Bi leg.; 2 3, 1 Ƥ ( CLYB), Nujiang, Gongshan County, VII.2011, Y.-B. Li leg.; 1 3, Honghe, Jinping, Fenshuiling Nature Reserve, VI.2010, X.-D. Yang & W.-X. Lin leg.
Identification. Two subspecies have been described, both with male holotypes illustrated. They are characterized by the mandible nearly of the same width from apex to base (different from P. dauricus , P. davidis , P. alessandrae and P. prossi ), the absence of the subbasal teeth along the dorsal ridge of the male mandible (different from P. klapperichi , P. alessandrae and P. davidis ), a large gap between the ventral subbasal teeth and the median teeth of the mandible (different from P. davidis , P. prossi , P. alessandrae and P. dauricus ), and the straight preocular margins (different from P. prossi and P. alessandrae ). Specimens from Yunnan examined by us match the above-mentioned characters of P. siniaevi . Moreover, we found that the underside of the body of P. siniaevi shows a pubescence that is not present in the other species.
The two subspecies are not easily distinguishable, as only a single male of P. siniaevi rattakiti is known from Myanmar. The male specimen from Gongshan, northwestern Yunnan does not match with the characters of P. siniaevi rattakiti from the adjacent area in northern Myanmar. For a more precise subspecific definition of P. siniaevi , more specimens need to be examined.
The females were unknown until Fujita (2010) illustrated a female specimen from Vietnam identified as this species without any discussion. One of the male specimens examined by us was collected from decayed wood alongside two female specimens, thus these females can be considered as the females of P. s i n i a e v i. A close examination shows that the female specimens have the peculiar pubescence on the ventral surface of the body as in male which is not found in the other species.
Taxonomic notes. This species is well separated from all of the other species by the marked pubescence on ventral surface of the body which is not shared by any other species.
Distribution. Yunnan (Nujiang, Jinping); northern Vietnam, northeastern Myanmar.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Prismognathus siniaevi Ikeda, 1997
Huang, Hao & Chen, Chang-Chin 2012 |
Prismognathus siniaevi rattakiti
Fujita 2010: 165 |
Nagai 2005: 32 |
Prismognathus siniaevi
Fujita 2010: 165 |
Ikeda 1997: 29 |