Coleophora animula, Baldizzone, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5071.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3BA598AF-FD3D-4C57-9A2D-6CA5FD19EA2E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5728109 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FB6F3B-993A-D23F-5499-FD3B86DCFF5C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Coleophora animula |
status |
sp. nov. |
Coleophora animula , sp. nov.
( Figs. 1 View FIGURES 1–8 , 17–21 View FIGURES 17–21 )
Holotype ♂ (B. M. Genitalia slide No. 32608) “Barberton | Transvaal |AJTJ. | 7.12 [19]10” [handwritten by Janse]; Coleophora scariphota Meyr. | 3/4 | E. Meyrick det. | in Meyrick coll.”; “NUMUK 0101894273”, in coll. NHMUK.
Note: In the NHMUK are four specimens determined by Meyrick as Coleophora scariphota Meyrick, 1911 , but they are not part of the original material of that species; there are two additional specimens similarly identified in TMSA [examined]. Of the NHMUK specimens, three come from the locality of Haenertsburg where those of the TMSA were also collected, while one was collected in Barberton. Examining the latter specimen I observed some differences in habitus and the dissection of the male genitalia confirmed that it is a new species, very different from C. scariphota .
Diagnosis. Small species of pale appearance, close to C. bantuella Baldizzone & van der Wolf, 2005 , known only from Democratic Republic of Congo (Katanga). In comparison with C. bantuella the size of C. animula is smaller. In the male genitalia of C. animula the main differences concern the tegumen which is larger, less constricted in the middle, the sacculus thicker and shorter on the outer edge, the phallotheca which is smaller, the structure formed by the fusion of the cornuti, which is more sclerotized and does not have the sharp point that is at the apex of that of C. bantuella ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 17–21 ). To the same group belongs C. mirabibella Baldizzone, Mey & van der Wolf, 2011 , a smaller species (5–6 mm of wingspan), greyish brown in colour, which has notable differences in male genitalia.
Description. Wingspan 10 mm. Head white. Antenna white, scape white, with a tuft of erect scales. Labial palpus white; third article as long as second. Proboscis short, normal shaped. Thorax and tegula white. Forewing light ochre suffused of white scales, especially in the costal band, not clearly delimited but shaded, wide at the base becoming narrower at 3/4 of wing; area between anal fold and dorsum white; costal fringe light ochre, dorsal fringe light grey. Hindwing and cilia ochreous grey. Abdomen light ochre.
Abdominal structures ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 17–21 ) Anterior lateral struts about 4 times as long as posterior ones. Transverse strut thin and linear on proximal edge, well sclerotized only in middle, thicker on distal edge. Tergal disks (3 rd tergite) length about 5 times their width, covered with about 25 small spines.
Male genitalia ( Figs. 17–20 View FIGURES 17–21 ): Gnathos knob globular. Tegumen medially constricted, pedunculus expanded externally. Transtilla elongate triangular. Valvula with long sclerotized ventral expansion which is fused with lateral edge of sacculus. Cucullus rather long and robust, slightly expanded on ventral side. Sacculus of trapezoidal shape, with strong, very sclerotized expansion, ventral angle rounded, dorsal angle rectangular. Phallotheca short, broad and stocky, shaped like arrowhead with rounded apex. Cornuti numerous, small, fused together in shape of short claw.
Female genitalia: Unknown.
Bionomy. The early stages and the foodplant are unknown.
Distribution. RSA (prov. Gauteng).
Etymology. From the Latin animula = little soul. In reference to the small size and pale appearance of the species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |