Sunius cokelezensis, Anlaş, 2015
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3906/zoo-1407-21 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6371B734-A92D-43E8-801E-57ADB8723431 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FAEA6D-FFF6-733A-FD22-9CB2EFC2FA11 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Sunius cokelezensis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Sunius cokelezensis View in CoL sp. nov. ( Figure 1 View Figure 1 )
Type material. Holotype: TURKEY: ♂ TR – Denizli Province, Çal, Çökelez Mountain , 1575 m, 38°02′48″N, 29°22′11″E, 15.IV.2014, leg. Örgel GoogleMaps / Holotypus ♂ Sunius cokelezensis sp. nov. det. S. Anlaş 2014 (cAZMM).
Description. Small species, 2.3 mm. Habitus as in
Figure 1A View Figure 1 . Coloration: forebody uniformly reddish-brown, with the head and posterior area of elytra darker; abdomen dark brown, with the paratergites paler brown; legs yellowish-brown; antennae reddish-brown.
Head ( Figures 1A and 1B View Figure 1 ) oblong, approximately 1.15 times as long as wide; punctation coarse, well defined, and relatively sparse, in lateral area slightly denser than in mediodorsal area; interstices without microsculpture; eyes small, weakly projecting from lateral outline of head, postocular region in dorsal view approximately 3 times as long as eyes. Antennae not slender and long, approximately 0.80 mm long.
Pronotum ( Figures 1A and 1B View Figure 1 ) approximately 0.90 times as wide as head, and about 1.10 times as long as wide; widest at anterior angles, distinctly narrowed posteriorly, microsculpture almost absent; punctation dense, except for the impunctate median line, and about as coarse as that of head.
Elytra ( Figures 1A and 1B View Figure 1 ) approximately as wide and at suture about 0.75 times as long as pronotum, humeral angles marked; punctation ill defined, much finer and shallower than that of pronotum; interstices without distinct microsculpture. Hind wings completely reduced.
Abdomen ( Figure 1A View Figure 1 ) about 1.20 times as wide as elytra, widest at segments VI–VII; punctation relatively dense and fine; interstices with microsculpture; pubescence blackish; posterior margin of tergite VII without palisade fringe.
♂: Sternite VII without modified pubescence; posterior margin very weakly concave medially ( Figure 1C View Figure 1 ), sternite VIII without modified pubescence and without tubercle, posterior incision small and not very deep ( Figure 1D View Figure 1 ); aedeagus ( Figures 1E–1G View Figure 1 ) approximately 0.41 mm long, weakly sclerotized, apical part of the ventral process in lateral view broad but apex acute, ending sharply; internal sac in lateral view with short black structure, in ventral view with two shaped knobs, but without sclerotized spines in both lateral and ventral views.
Comparative notes. The species is distinguished from all its congeners by the completely different shape of the ventral process of the aedeagus. For illustrations of the male sexual characters of these species, see the figures by Assing (2001, 2003, 2005a, 2005b, 2005c, 2006, 2011b).
Based on the similarly derived morphology of the male primary and secondary sexual characters, S. cokelezensis is closely related to S. sandiklicus sp. nov. The new species is distinguished from S. sultanicus by the smaller body, different coloration ( S. sultanicus : head reddish to dark brown; pronotum reddish to reddish-brown; elytra reddish; abdomen dark brown; legs and antennae reddishyellow), more oblong pronotum, slightly more concave in the middle posterior margin of male sternite VII, slightly smaller posterior incision of male sternite VIII, and different shape of aedeagus ( S. sultanicus : ventral process very slender and acute, especially in lateral view. S. cokelezensis : ventral process in lateral view broad but apex acute, ending sharply, in ventral view with two shaped knobs).
Etymology. The specific epithet is derived from the name of Çökelez Mountain, where the type locality is situated.
Distribution and bionomics. The new species was collected in only one locality from Çökelez Mountain, Denizli Province, in grassland at an elevation of 1575 m a.s.l. This species is most probably endemic to Çökelez Mountain in Denizli Province.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |