Utivarachna fukasawana Kishida, 1940
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5343.1.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:20BF9AB4-F86D-42EA-AEAA-7C03EBA44EB6 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8324643 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FA87E7-FFBC-FFD6-FF7D-3E82FDCE8A93 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Utivarachna fukasawana Kishida, 1940 |
status |
|
Utivarachna fukasawana Kishida, 1940 View in CoL
Figs 16–19 View FIGURE 16 View FIGURE 17 View FIGURE 18 View FIGURE 19
Utivarachna fukasawana Kishida, 1940: 142 View in CoL ; Deeleman-Reinhold, 2001: 373, figs 575–580; Dankittipakul, Tavano & Singtripop, 2011: 137, fig. 6.
Material examined. 1 ♀ ( RMNH.ARA. 15300), Brunei , Kuala Belalong, West Ridge , 8.II.1992, leg. R. Snazell (label data shown in Fig. 18E and F View FIGURE 18 are the same as those of the neotype). 1 ♁ (LCo20070821_O1; MNHAH), Lambir Hills National Park, Sarawak .
Diagnosis. In the fukasawana -group, U. fukasawana and U. ichneumon are easily recognizable by the long stalk projection of the posterior carapace, especially in males. In males, U. fukasawana can be distinguished from U. ichneumon by the wide cymbium and bulb. In females, U. fukasawana has short bursae, whereas U. ichneumon has long, tube-like bursae.
Measurements (♁/ ♀). Carapace length 3.35/2.86; cephalic width 1.45/1.33; thoracic width 1.77/1.62. Diameter of eyes: AME 0.18/0.17; ALE 0.17/0.17; PME 0.15/0.13; PLE 0.13/0.16. Interdistances between eyes: AME–AME 0.06/0.05; AME–ALE 0.07/0.06; ALE–ALE 0.58/0.50; PME–PME 0.17/0.16; PME–PLE 0.35/0.27; PLE–PLE 1.11/0.97; ALE–PLE 0.22/0.20; AME–PME 0.07/0.05. MOA: length 0.35/0.28; anterior width 0.41/0.36; posterior width 0.46/0.43. Clypeus height 0.40/0.33. Abdomen length 2.76/2.73; width 1.27/1.76. Legs: I 10.56 (2.80, 1.10, 2.70, 2.80, 1.16)/8.73 (2.45, 0.86, 2.25, 2.15, 1.02); II 8.92 (2.46, 0.90, 2.20, 2.33, 1.03)/7.90 (2.25, 0.73, 2.02, 1.97, 0.93); III 5.36 (1.50, 0.62, 1.17, 1.50, 0.57)/5.04 (1.43, 0.58, 1.11, 1.35, 0.57); IV 7.15 (2.00, 0.70, 1.57, 2.12, 0.76)/7.13 (2.00, 0.63, 1.65, 2.10, 0.75).
Male ( Fig. 16A–D View FIGURE 16 ). Carapace oval, entirely granulated; posterior stalk almost as long as 1/4 carapace length; PER slightly recurved in dorsal view; ocular tubercle accompanied with PLE; thoracic lateral margins undulating. Chelicerae granulated, with five prolateral and five retrolateral teeth. Ventral clypeus margin with small wedge-shaped projection between chelicerae. Pedicel short. Abdomen elongate oval; anterior two-thirds with weakly sclerotized dorsal scutum. Leg I and II elongated, covered with fine spherical granulation; ventral sides of tibia, metatarsus, and tarsus bearing small tooth-like cusps.
Palp ( Fig. 17A–D View FIGURE 17 ). Cymbium strongly convex in retrolateral margin. Bulb inverted pear-shaped, tapering posteriorly; anterior half membranous, and prolateral half weakly sclerotized with subtegulum. Embolus coiled in horizontal plane, inclining dorsally, and plane completely covered by cymbium. Sperm duct U-curved in posterior part of bulb. RTA strongly extended, apically developed into semi-transparent plate with apical claw; base of claw well-sclerotized and developed; claw slender, strongly curved dorsally.
Coloration and setation ( Fig. 16A–D View FIGURE 16 ). Carapace and chelicerae brown, covered with fine setae. Abdomen cream, entirely covered with short setae. All legs brownish cream, except for femora I–II and trochanters I–II brown to light brown.
Female ( Fig. 18A–D View FIGURE 18 ). Somatic characters almost identical to males, except for abdomen shape and shorter posterior stalk; posterior stalk almost as long as 1/5 carapace length. Chelicerae granulated, with six prolateral and five retrolateral teeth. Abdomen oval, without dorsal scutum.
Copulatory organs ( Fig. 19A–C View FIGURE 19 ). Copulatory atrium square. Copulatory openings located at anterior corner of atrium, extending anteriorly with several coils and connected to slender bursae. Spermathecae globular.
Coloration and setation ( Fig. 18A–D View FIGURE 18 ). Almost same as in male.
Distribution. Brunei, Sarawak
RMNH |
National Museum of Natural History, Naturalis |
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Utivarachna fukasawana Kishida, 1940
Yamasaki, Takeshi, Hashimoto, Yoshiaki, Endo, Tomoji, Hyodo, Fujio, Itioka, Takao, Mohamed, Maryati & Meleng, Paulus 2023 |
Utivarachna fukasawana
Dankittipakul, P. & Tavano, M. & Singtripop, T. 2011: 137 |
Deeleman-Reinhold, C. L. 2001: 373 |
Kishida, K. 1940: 142 |