Utivarachna rubra Deeleman-Reinhold, 2001
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5343.1.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:20BF9AB4-F86D-42EA-AEAA-7C03EBA44EB6 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8324639 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FA87E7-FFB1-FFD3-FF7D-3F87FD568BA2 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Utivarachna rubra Deeleman-Reinhold, 2001 |
status |
|
Utivarachna rubra Deeleman-Reinhold, 2001 View in CoL
Figs 8–11 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9 View FIGURE 10 View FIGURE 11
Utivarachna rubra Deeleman-Reinhold, 2001: 391 View in CoL , figs 620–622.
Type material examined. Holotype ♁ ( RMNH 15184 About RMNH ) and paratype ♀ ( RMNH 15184 About RMNH ). Label data for both shown in Fig. 8E View FIGURE 8 . Data according to Deeleman-Reinhold (2001): 02º02’S, 113º40’E, Kaharian, C. Kalimantan , 2–16.IX.1985, leg. S. Djojosudharmo. GoogleMaps
Other material. 2 ♁ ( LMB-TY20180829 -TR04, LMB-TY20180829 -TR05), 2 ♀ ( LMB-TY20180829 -TR02, LMB-TY20180829 -TR03), Sungai Liku [Liku River], Lambir Hills National Park, Sarawak, 29.VIII.2018, leg. T. Yamasaki; 1 ♁ (LCo20090227-E3, MNHAH), Walk-way (beyond second tower), 27.II.2009, Lambir Hills National Park, Sarawak, leg. T. Endo .
Diagnosis. See Diagnosis of U. itiokai sp. nov. and U. dusun .
Measurements (holotype ♁/ paratype ♀). Carapace length 1.52/1.35; cephalic width 0.78/0.68; thoracic width 1.10/0.96. Diameter of eyes: AME 0.11/0.08; ALE 0.12/0.12; PME 0.10/0.11; PLE 0.11/0.11. Interdistances between eyes: AME–AME 0.03/0.02; AME–ALE 0.02/0.01; ALE–ALE 0.28/0.23; PME–PME 0.10/0.08; PME– PLE 0.10/0.07; PLE–PLE 0.47/0.43; ALE–PLE 0.08/0.06; AME–PME 0.05/0.03. MOA: length 0.28/0.26; anterior width 0.25/0.22; posterior width 0.30/0.28. Clypeus height 0.27/0.21. Abdomen length 1.45/1.47; width 1.01/1.13. Legs: I 3.83 (1.25, 0.50, 0.93, 0.63, 0.52)/3.22 (1.01, 0.37, 0.75, 0.61, 0.48); II 3.25 (0.96, 0.37, 0.72, 0.73, 0.47)/2.95 (0.88, 0.31, 0.66, 0.65, 0.45); III 2.56 (0.75, 0.30, 0.52, 0.62, 0.37)/2.29 (0.66, 0.28, 0.47, 0.55, 0.33); IV 3.23 (0.90, 0.33, 0.72, 0.85, 0.43)/3.02 (0.85, 0.28, 0.68, 0.80, 0.41).
Male ( Fig. 8A–D View FIGURE 8 ). Carapace oval and superficially granulated with truncated posterior end. Thoracic lateral margins hardly undulating. AER slightly recurved. PER longer than AER, almost straight. Fovea shallow, indistinct. Clypeus margin with small projection that truncated or weakly bifurcated. Chelicerae superficially granulated, with three teeth on each prolateral and retrolateral margin. Pedicel short. Abdomen oval; entire dorsum weakly sclerotized. Legs superficially granulated; leg I enlarged, bearing cusps ventrally.
Palp ( Fig. 9A–D View FIGURE 9 ). Cymbium oval. Bulb oval. Sperm duct U-shaped, visible through posterior tegulum. Embolus coiled at horizontal plane; embolus coil plane inclining dorsally, covered by cymbium; basal embolus part accompanied by sclerotized plate located in middle and anterior parts of tegulum. RTA long; anterior half of RTA strongly curved dorsally.
Coloration and setation ( Fig. 8A–D View FIGURE 8 ). Carapace brown. Chelicerae brown. Abdomen covered with fine setae; dorsal sclerotized surface pale amber-colored; lateral and ventral surfaces cream, tinged with black.
Female ( Fig. 10A–D View FIGURE 10 ). Somatic characteristics almost identical to diagnosis characteristics of U. dusun group (described above). Chelicerae with three prolateral and two retrolateral teeth. Abdomen oval, without distinct dorsal scutum. Leg I robust but weaker than that of male; ventral side covered with sparse cusps; ventral depression at proximal end of metatarsus indistinct.
Copulatory organs ( Fig. 11A–C View FIGURE 11 ). Copulatory atrium wider than long, with sclerotized lateral margins.Copulatory ducts wide anteriorly, gradually tapering posteriorly, forming complicated loops. Bursae slender pear-shaped, with spherical terminals. Spermathecae tube-like shaped, with long narrow fertilization ducts extending posteriorly.
Coloration and setation ( Fig. 10A–D View FIGURE 10 ). Almost same as in male, except for grayish abdomen.
Distribution. Central Kalimantan, Sarawak.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Utivarachna rubra Deeleman-Reinhold, 2001
Yamasaki, Takeshi, Hashimoto, Yoshiaki, Endo, Tomoji, Hyodo, Fujio, Itioka, Takao, Mohamed, Maryati & Meleng, Paulus 2023 |
Utivarachna rubra
Deeleman-Reinhold, C. L. 2001: 391 |