Sinopoda nuda, Liu, Jie, Li, Shuqiang & Jäger, Peter, 2008
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.183582 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5689447 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F8E56C-FF82-FFE2-FF2B-FC3E87C5C4F5 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Sinopoda nuda |
status |
sp. nov. |
Sinopoda nuda View in CoL sp. nov.
Figs 5A–F View FIGURES 5 A – F , 10A–D View FIGURES 10 A – L. A – D and 12 View FIGURE 12
Type material: Holotype male, 5 females (all IZCAS) and 2 females ( SMF) paratypes, CHINA: Guizhou Province, Suiyang County, Wenquan Town, Hejiaodong Cave (28º14.704’N, 107º17.304’E, Alt: 695m, T: 15°C, H: 90%), 12 May 2007, Yucheng Lin, Jie Liu leg; 1 male, 7 female (all IZCAS) paratypes, CHINA: Guizhou Province, Suiyang County, Wenquan Town, Shanwangdong Cave (28º14.724’N, 107º17.312’E, Alt: 765m, T: 14°C, H: 94%), 13 May 2007, Yucheng Lin, Jie Liu leg.
Etymology: The specific name is derived from the Latin nudus, -a, -um, meaning “nude, simple, umarmed”, referring to the simple embolus of this new species that lacks the apophysis characteristic for representative of the genus Sinopoda ; adjective.
Diagnosis: Based on the absence of the embolic apophysis and the presence of a distinct brush of stiff setae at the base of the RTA, this new species belongs to the Sinopoda okinawana -group, but it can be separated from other okinawana -group species by the developed ventral RTA ( Figs 5A–D View FIGURES 5 A – F ). Moreover, the shape of the basal embolus is not semicircular as in S. albofasciata Jäger & Ono 2002 or S. derivata Jäger & Ono 2002 , but exhibits a distinct bend in S. nuda sp. nov. The female is similar to Sinopoda longshan in the shape of epigynal pockets and dorsad tips of posterior spermathecae, but can be distinguished by the following differences: 1. median part of epigyne wider in the new species (narrow in S. longshan ); 2. anterior appendices of the internal duct system distinctly shorter in the new species (longer in S. longshan ; Figs 4A–B View FIGURES 4 A – B , 5E–F View FIGURES 5 A – F ).
Description: Male (holotype). Measurements (in mm): PL 6.7, PW 6.0, AW 2.8, PH 5.2, OL 8.2, OW 4.5. Eyes: AME 0.31, ALE 0.48, PME 0.40, PLE 0.64, AME–AME 0.13, AME–ALE 0.09, PME–PME 0.27, PME–PLE 0.12, AME–PME 0.28, ALE–PLE 0.08, CH AME 0.31, CH ALE 0.40. Leg and palp measurements: Pp 13.1 (4.8, 2.2, 3.0, -, 3.1), I 49.4 (12.7, 3.9, 13.9, 15.2, 3.7), II 54.2 (14.2, 4.2, 15.5, 16.4, 3.9), III 42.2 (11.5, 3.6, 11.6, 11.9, 3.6), IV 43.4 (12.2, 3.4, 12.5, 11.9, 3.4). Leg formula: II-I-IV-III. Spination: Pp 131, 101, 1210; Fe 323; Pa 101; Ti 2326; Mt I–II 1014, III 2026, IV 3036.
Palp as in diagnosis. Embolus long and slender, proximal part of embolus narrow and entirely visible. Embolic apophysis absent. Sperm duct slightly curved in ventral view. Dorsal RTA slender and blunt, distinctly curved in retrolateral view; ventral RTA well developed and stout from retrolateral view. Both palpal tarsus and tibia elongated, cymbium slightly longer than tibia ( Figs 5A–D View FIGURES 5 A – F ).
Female (paratype from Hejiaodong Cave). Measurements (in mm): PL 6.7, PW 5.7, AW 3.4, PH 5.5, OL 9.0, OW 4.6. Eyes: AME 0.32, ALE 0.63, PME 0.42, PLE 0.56, AME–AME 0.07, AME–ALE 0.09, PME–PME 0.30, PME–PLE 0.26, AME–PME 0.32, ALE–PLE 0.19, CH AME 0.32, CH ALE 0.39. Leg and palp measurements: Pp 11.5 (3.9, 1.8, 2.4, -, 3.4), I 35.7 (9.9, 3.6, 10.0, 9.6, 2.7), II 38.7 (10.9, 3.9, 11.0, 10.1, 2.7), III 31.9 (9.6, 3.3, 9.0, 7.6, 2.5), IV 34.5 (10.0, 3.1, 9.6, 8.8, 3.0). Leg formula: II-I-IV-III. Spination: Pp 131, 101, 2121, 1014; Fe 323; Pa 101; Ti I 2126, II–IV 2226; Mt I–II 1014, III 3034, IV 3036.
Copulatory organ as in diagnosis. Median part of epigyne broad, diverging posteriorly. Posterior margin of epigyne distinctly bilobate. Anterior part of internal duct system with distinctly bilobate appendix; posterior part wider than anterior part, tips of the posterior spermathecae bent considerably ( Figs 5E–F View FIGURES 5 A – F ).
Distribution: China (Guizhou) ( Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |