Nototrisaria ornata Shear & Marek, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5205.6.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9D1DEC25-5FA2-4D64-807E-F103C3FCB5CA |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7318613 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F89303-FFBF-FFB4-9AF9-2B45E0EBFA1D |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Nototrisaria ornata Shear & Marek |
status |
sp. nov. |
Nototrisaria ornata Shear & Marek , n. sp.
Figs 1–6 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURES 2–6 , 49–51 View FIGURES 49–55
Types: Male holotype and male paratype from 9.6 miles up Elochoman Valley Road from Rt. 4, Wahakiakum Co., Washington, 46.289633°N, - 123.26485°W, 450’ asl, collected 28 March 2004 by C. Richart, W. Leonard; GoogleMaps male paratype from 11.7 mi up Elochoman Valley Road from Rt. 4, 450’ asl, 46.316783°N, - 123.2617°W, 28 March 2004, collected by C. Richart; GoogleMaps male and female paratypes from Trap Creek , 1.1 mi S of SR6, Pacific Co. Washington, 46.5468°N, - 123.6161°W, 180’ asl, collected 11 January 2003 and 3 May 2003 by W. Leonard. GoogleMaps Parts of a male paratype are mounted on SEM stub WS3-8. Types deposited in the CAS.
Etymology: The species name, a Latin adjective, refers to the ornate dorsum.
Diagnosis: As for the genus; see above.
Description: Male paratype from Elochoman River Road. Length, 5.5 mm, width 0.6 mm (includes paranota). Thirty postcephalic rings including telson.
Head ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 2–6 ) densely setose, with sculpture of tiny, acute tubercles; labral corners rounded, without projecting hook. Ommatidia absent. Antennae short, robust. Mandibular stipes ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 2–6 , m) with sawtooth distal edge, acute apical projection. Color of live specimen white to pale yellow ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ).
Collum ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 2–6 , col) broadly expanded, with 10 subequal crests limited to posterior two-thirds; anterior third with pebbled sculpture. Anterior rings ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 2–6 ) with C2 and C6 exaggerated, the latter expanded into prominent paranota with deep posterior notch; C1 reduced to a few knobs, absent on more posterior rings, C2 also progressively lower on midbody ring, exaggerated again on most posterior 6–8 rings ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 2–6 ). Metazonital setae not observed, probably absent. Limbus serrate.
Telson without crests, lobes deeply incised ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 2–6 ).
First legpair crassate ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 2–6 , L 1 View FIGURE 1 ), larger than legpairs 2 and 3 ( Fig. 2, L2, L3 View FIGURES 2–6 ), postfemora and tibia set with long, stiff setae, tarsus with comb. Legpair 2 relatively small, similar to postgonopodal legs. Legpair 3 with prominent, broad, slightly sigmoidal coxal flasks bearing curled setae on anterior surface ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 2–6 , cf); prefemora expanded, flattened. Legpairs 4–6 strongly crassate. Legpair 7 similar to pairs 4–6, but with large, flattened coxal plates covering bases of gonopods.
Gonopods in mesal view ( Figs 5 View FIGURES 2–6 , 50 View FIGURES 49–55 ) with anterior angiocoxites erect, narrow, hooked and expanded at tip; posterior edge with continuous fimbriate lamina, lamina ends in long distal projection; tuft of strong, thin cuticular projections subapically (aac, Figs 5 View FIGURES 2–6 , 49, 50 View FIGURES 49–55 ). Posterior angiocoxites as broad, rounded plate (pac, Figs 5 View FIGURES 2–6 , 50 View FIGURES 49–55 ). Flagellocoxites absent. Colpocoxite (cc, Figs 5 View FIGURES 2–6 , 49, 50 View FIGURES 49–55 ) developed as compact mass of finely divided, sinuous fimbriae with small posterior portion unmodified, sclerotized.
Ninth legpair ( Figs 6 View FIGURES 2–6 , 51 View FIGURES 49–55 ) strongly reduced, sternum (s9), coxae (cx) and telopodites (t9) fused; coxal part with blunt triangular process (cp), telopodite part with long, finger-like basal process bearing acute setae.
Tenth leg with enlarged, glandular coxae ( Fig 6 View FIGURES 2–6 , cx10).
Female paratype similar to male in nonsexual characters, but exaggerated crests significantly lower. A living female specimen is depicted in Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 .
Distribution: As for the genus. The Grays Harbor County record (WASHINGTON: Grays Harbor Co.: Canyon River, 47.303517°N, - 121.508167°W, 1500’ asl, 12 December 2004, W. P. Leonard) is based on a female that strongly resembles the females from other localities.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |