Cephalogale sp.
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1206/0003-0082(2005)483[0001:AAAACF]2.0.CO;2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5647939 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F85E56-FFD4-E863-FEA1-FA2F478C681A |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Cephalogale sp. |
status |
|
Figure 15A–C View Fig
REFERRED SPECIMEN: MAE SG.97.5396, left ramal fragment with m2.
COMMENTS: MAE SG.97.5396 (fig. 15A– C) is clearly not assignable to the Hsanda Gol ursoids discussed above. The size of the m2 indicates an animal of the size of Amphicticeps dorog , but it does not have the extremely shortened m2 of the latter. Indicating its primitive status, MAE SG.97.5396 has a paraconid platform in front of the protoconid, and the paraconid is separate from the protoconid by a weak notch. A paraconid is absent in the Hsanda Gol Amphicticeps and Amphicynodon . Furthermore, the protoconid and metaconid are not widely separate from each other, as in both of the above genera. The morphological condition in MAE SG.97.5396 evokes that of a more primitive carnivoran, and the fact that it has an m3 alveolus tends to suggest a basal arctoid among known lineages in this period of time.
In size and overall proportions, MAE SG.97.5396 is closest to a recently described small arctoid, Pachycynodon tedfordi Wang and Qiu, 2003 , from the early Oligocene Saint Jacques locality of Chinese Inner Mongolia (see further comments below about its generic status). Unfortunately, the m2 on the Chinese specimen is too worn to permit detailed comparisons.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.