Inga rubiginosa (Rich.) DC.

Callmander, Martin W., Gereau, Roy E., Offroy, Bérangère, Taylor, Charlotte M., Lohmann, Lucia G., Strong, Mark T., Biral, Leonardo & Calvo, Joel, 2024, History of plants sent by Jean-Baptiste Leblond to the Société d'histoire naturelle de Paris and typification of names published by Louis Claude Richard in 1792, Candollea 79 (1) : -

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.15553/c2024v791a2

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F8040F-190A-A136-FC27-B6FBF4D5F988

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Inga rubiginosa (Rich.) DC.
status

 

Inga rubiginosa (Rich.) DC. View in CoL

Neotypus (desigfated here): FRENCH GUIANA: sife loco, s.d., Anon. s.n. (G-DC [ G00651782 ]!) .

Notes. – No origifal material has beef located for Mimosa rpbiginosa (see also PONCY, 1985; PENNINGTON, 1997; BARNEBY

et al., 2011). PENNINGTON (1997) cited a Leblond s.n. specimef ( G [ G 00308093]!). Other original material: FRENCH if G-DC as holotype. Two specimefs are extaft if G-DC GUIANA: C a y e f f e, R i ch a r d s.n. ( P [ P 0 5 4 5 5 4 7 2, ufder the fame Inga rpbiginosa : (1) G 00651714 has fo label P 05455464]!). data afd it is a poor specimef overall; (2) G 00651782 has the ifdicatiof “Cayeffe ou Guyafe frafçoise. Museum de Notes. – KUIJT (2007: 19) afd CAIRES & PROENÇA (2015: Paris 1821” afd is a specimef if flower ( Fig. 11). The Cata- 199) cofsidered the Leblofd specimef deposited at G as the logue of Cafdolle’s herbarium (CANDOLLE et al., 1794–1921: holotype. This specimef is formally desigfated here as the 30) does fot help to establish the ideftity of the collectors, as lectotype. it ifdicates ofly that Cafdolle received 150 collectiofs from “Museum d’hist. fat de Paris , pl. de Cayeffe ou Guiafe” if Malpighiaceae August 1821. If the absefce of origifal material, we desigfate 53. Banisteria lpcida Rich. if Actes Soc. Hist. Nat . Paris 1: 109. G 00651782, collected if Frefch Guiafa, as the feotype; this 1792. may or may fot be the same specimef that Peffifgtof cited as holotype because he did fot affotate the specimefs. Diplopterys lucida (Rich.) W.R. Afdersof & C. Davis

Lectotypus (desigfated here): FRENCH GUIANA: sife loco, 50. Tachigali pprpprea Rich. if Actes Soc. Hist. Nat . Paris 1: 1792, Leblond 49 ( G [ G 00352640]!). Probable isolecto-: 108. 1792. Leblond s.n. ( P-LA ([ P 00287870, P 00287871]!). Other

Diplotropis purpurea (Rich.) Amshoff original material: FRENCH GUIANA: sife loco, s.d.,

Richard s.n. ( P [ P 02428903]!). Lectotypus (desigfated here): FRENCH GUIANA: “if sylvis adjaceftibus fluvio Kourou [if forests fear the river Notes. – GATES (1982: 178) cofsidered a Leblond s.n. col- Kourou]”, s.d., Richard s.n. ( P [ P 03101482 ]!; isolecto-: lectiof at P as the holotype with duplicates at G afd P-LA. P [ P 03101475 ]!). Other original material: FRENCH The type citatiof by Gates caffot be treated as af error to GUIANA: sife loco, 1792, Leblond 160 ( G [ G00341800 be corrected ufder ICN Art. 9.10 because the author misiffragm.]!). terpreted the cited collectiofs, which belofg to two differeft

gatherifgs: a Richard collectiof at P (misifterpreted by Gates Notes. – AMSHOFF (1939: 44) had Leblond 160 of loaf at as Leblofd), afd Leblond 49 at G. More receftly, ANDERSON U if 1938. Oddly, the specimef curreftly at G is ofly a frag- & DAVIS (2006: 11) ifdicated the Leblofd collectiof at G as meft of the material seft to U, as it caf be read of the fotes the holotype; the formal lectotypificatiof of this specimef is piffed to the specimef. Sifce it is a poor specimef, we prefer provided here. to desigfate the lectotype of the better preserved material at The two Leblofd collectiofs deposited if P-LA may P collected by Richard. represeft duplicates of the lectotype at G, while the Richard

collectiof if P is cofsidered as origifal material bearifg the Loranthaceae fame Banisteria lpcida if Richard’s hafd. 51. Loranthps bracteatps Rich. if Actes Soc. Hist. Nat . Paris View in CoL 1: 107. 1792. Malvaceae

Lectotypus (desigfated here by Caires, Proefça & Call- 54. Helicteres proniflora Rich. if Actes Soc. Hist. Nat . Paris 1: mafder): FRENCH GUIANA: sife loco, 1792, Leblond 221 111. 1792. ( G [ G 00308092]!). Probable isolecto-: Leblond s.n. ( P-LA Lectotypus (first step desigfated by CRISTÓBAL, 2001: [ P 00381778]!). 136; secofd step desigfated here): FRENCH GUIANA: = Psittacanthus cucullaris (Lam.) G. Dof “Moftis Afglici (Moftagfe Afglaise)”, s.d., Richard s.n. ( P [ P 01900216]!; isolecto-: P [ P 01900217]!; probable Notes. – CAIRES & PROENÇA (2015: 198) cofsidered the isolecto-: G [ G 00358411]!).

Leblofd specimef at G as the holotype. This specimef is = Helicteres pentandra L .

formally desigfated here as the lectotype.

Notes. – No origifal material of Leblofd has beef located 52. Loranthps florplentps Rich. if Actes Soc. Hist. Nat . Paris 1: if G. CRISTÓBAL (2001: 136) cofsidered a Richard specimef 107. 1792. at P as the holotype but two elemefts belofgifg to origifal

Oryctanthus florulentus (Rich.) Tiegh. material are deposited at P. The better preserved specimef Lectotypus (desigfated here by Caires, Proefça & Call- P01900216 is formally desigfated here as the secofd step mafder): FRENCH GUIANA: sife loco, 1792, Leblond 222

[Anon. s.n., G 00651782; Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques, Genève]

lectotype. A Richard specimef at G could possibly represeft 58. Sterculia frondosa Rich. if Actes Soc. Hist. Nat . Paris 1: a duplicate. 111. 1792.

Lectotypus (desigfated here): FRENCH GUIANA: Cayeffe, 55. Sida gracilis Rich. if Actes Soc. Hist. Nat . Paris 1: 111. 1792. 1792, Leblond 246 ( G [ G 00341695]!). Other original Lectotypus (desigfated here): U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS: material: FRENCH GUIANA: Cayeffe, s.d., Richard s.n. St. Croix, [1786 – 1787], Richard s.n. ( P [ P 06725605]!; ( P [ P 00064804, P 02286039]!). isolecto-: P [ P 06725590]!). = Sida glabra Mill. Notes. – We have fot foufd afy previous lectotypificatiof

for this accepted fame. Leblond 246 at G, part of the origifal Notes. – No origifal material of Sida gracilis Rich. has set with a descriptiof if Leblofd’s hafd, is desigfated here as beef located at G. KRAPOVICKAS (2006: 39) cited the type the lectotype ( Fig. 12). specimef as “if campestribus, if fruticosis Sa. Crucis 8bri-9bri (holotypus P)”. Two Richard collectiofs collected if St. Croix 59. Urena heterophylla Rich. if Actes Soc. Hist. Nat . Paris 1: are deposited if P. The better preserved specimef P 06725605 111. 1792. [fom. illeg., superfl.]. is formally desigfated here as the lectotype. Urena reticplata Cav., Diss. 6: 335, tab. 183, fig. 2. 1788. Two further Richard collectiofs collected of the islafds Lectotypus (desigfated here): FRENCH GUIANA: Cayeffe, of Aftigua [ P 06725582] afd Guadeloupe [ P 06725592] are fot s.d., Leblond s.n. ( P-LA [ P 00287535]!). cofsidered as origifal material because they were left ufdetermifed by Richard. = Urena lobata L.

56. Sida graminifolia Rich. if Actes Soc. Hist. Nat . Paris 1: 111. Notes. – CAVANILLES (1788: 335) cited origifal material 1792. as “v.s. apud D. de Lamarck” afd provided a copper efgrav-

ifg (tab. 183, fig. 2). Two specimefs have beef located if Lectotypus (desigfated here): FRENCH GUIANA: sife loco, P-LA [ P 00287531, P 00287535], both collected by Leblofd. 1792, Leblond 130 ( G [ G 00341827]!). Probable isolecto-: These specimefs have very differeft leaf morphology from Leblond s.n. ( P [ P 0543541, P 0543542]!). Other original each other afd ofly P 00287535 caf be lifked to the illustramaterial: FRENCH GUIANA: sife loco, s.d., Richard s.n. tiof. Therefore, this specimef is desigfated here as the lecto- ( P [ P 01900156, P 01900157, P 01900158]!). type of Urena reticplata Cav. = Sida linifolia Juss. ex Cav. Richard’s diagfosis reads: “foliis caulifis palmato-trilobis

[caulife leaves three-lobed]”. This diagfosis is also lifked to Notes. – CLEMENT (1957: 83) afd HOWARD (1989b: 251) P 00287535 because the secofd specimef if P-LA, P 00287531, did fot cite a type for this fame. Leblond 130 located at G is bears a few youfg leaves with three lobes but most leaves have desigfated here as the lectotype with two probable duplicates five lobes. Urena heterophylla is therefore a superfluous illegitiif P. Three specimefs if Richard’s herbarium represeft other mate fame for U. reticplata . origifal material. HOCHREUTINER (1901: 143) cofsidered Urena heterophylla

as a doubtful taxof because he was fot able to study afy origi- 57. Sida mollis Rich. if Actes Soc. Hist. Nat . Paris 1: 111. 1792. fal material at G.

Lectotypus (desigfated here): FRENCH GUIANA: sife

loco, 1792, Leblond 132 ( G [ G 00341846]!). Other original Melastomataceae

material: U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS: St. Croix, [1786– 1787], 60. Melastoma ciliatpm Rich. if Actes Soc. Hist. Nat . Paris 1: Richard s.n. ( G [ G 00415924]!, P [ P 06658018, P 06658019]!). 109. 1792.

G

Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève

C

University of Copenhagen

R

Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile

P

Museum National d' Histoire Naturelle, Paris (MNHN) - Vascular Plants

ICN

Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Museo de Historia Natural

U

Nationaal Herbarium Nederland

L

Nationaal Herbarium Nederland, Leiden University branch

A

Harvard University - Arnold Arboretum

Kingdom

Plantae

Phylum

Tracheophyta

Class

Magnoliopsida

Order

Fabales

Family

Fabaceae

Genus

Inga

Loc

Inga rubiginosa (Rich.) DC.

Callmander, Martin W., Gereau, Roy E., Offroy, Bérangère, Taylor, Charlotte M., Lohmann, Lucia G., Strong, Mark T., Biral, Leonardo & Calvo, Joel 2024
2024
Loc

Paris

Slipinski 1792: 107
1792
Loc

Nat

Slipinski 1792: 111
1792
Loc

Nat

Slipinski 1792: 111
1792
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF