Ulmeritoides haarupi (EsbenPetersen) Esben-Petersen, 2005
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.170066 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6267044 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F787BB-0330-FFC8-F973-39ABF28EC359 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ulmeritoides haarupi (EsbenPetersen) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Ulmeritoides haarupi (EsbenPetersen) View in CoL comb. n.
( Figures 1–2 View FIGURES 1 – 9 )
Thraulus haarupi EsbenPetersen, 1912:337 ; Navás 1917:188. Deleatidium haarupi ; Ulmer, 1920:115; 1938:105; 1943:15. Atalophlebioides haarupi ; Traver, 1946:423.
Ulmeritus (Ulmeritus) haarupi ; Traver, 1959:5; Thew, 1960:123; Domínguez, 1991:160. Deleatidium vittatum Thew, 1960:130 . syn. n.
Ulmeritoides fidalgoi Domínguez, 1995:23 . syn. n.
EsbenPetersen (1912) originally described Thraulus haarupi from Bompland, Argentina, from a damaged female which lacked forelegs and cerci. He suggested that this represented a new genus but postponed any action because he did not know the male. Traver (1959) described a female from Uruguay that she attributed to this species although it differed in some characters from the description of T. haarupi— particularly size, absence of a median longitudinal line on the mesonotum, coloration of the prothorax (not discussed by EsbenPetersen), and shading on the basal, ventral margin of the metathoracic femur. This species was also treated in Deleatidium View in CoL by Ulmer (1920, 1938, 1943) and Atalophlebioides View in CoL by Traver (1946) based on the fact that it was not Thraulus View in CoL . In 1956, Traver established the genus Ulmeritus View in CoL , which she later divided into three subgenera ( Traver 1959): Ulmeritus View in CoL , Ulmeritoides View in CoL , and Pseudulmeritus . She placed T. haarupi in Ulmeritus View in CoL s.s. based on the hind wing. Ulmeritoides View in CoL was raised to generic status in 1991 and the subgenus Pseudulmeritus was synonymized with Ulmeritoides ( Domínguez 1991) View in CoL .
In 1960, Thew described Deleatidium vittatum from Nova Teutônia, Santa Catarina State, Brazil, from two female imagos. He gave no illustrations, but did give a detailed description of coloration. This description matches Traver's (1959) female " U. haarupi " from Uruguay, except that Thew did not mention the heavier basal shading on the metathoracic femur described by Traver.
In 1995, Domínguez described another species, Ulmeritoides fidalgoi , from male and female imagos and nymphs, also from Bompland, Argentina.
We (J.G. Peters and R.W. Flowers) have examined the holotypes of Thraulus haarupi and Deleatidium vittatum , and four paratype females of Ulmeritoides fidalgoi . Venation of the holotype of Thraulus haarupi is as illustrated by EsbenPetersen (1912), but all color has faded. The holotype of Deleatidium vittatum is an Ulmeritoides in good condition and the wing venation, reddish brown costal strip, and heavy costal cross veins are still clear; however, body colors are faded. Thus, it is necessary to use the original descriptions by EsbenPetersen (1912) and Thew (1960) for most details of coloration. The paratypes of Ulmeritoides fidalgoi retain a good color pattern, including caudal filaments with dark annulations as described by Thew for Deleatidium vittatum . The range of forewing length (9 mm to 11 mm) for described and examined specimens of Ulmeritoides fidalgoi encompasses the sizes of Ulmeritus haarupi and Deleatidium vittatum , and the costal wing markings are identical for all. All described female pronota appear to fall within the range of U. fidalgoi , although these details were not given by EsbenPetersen (1912). The presence of a fine longitudinal dark brown line on the mesonotum of U. haarupi represents a variation found in U. fidalgoi , and the median longitudinal suture may appear lighter or darker depending on source of illumination. The position of the costal projection and length of vein Sc of hind wings differs in males and females; in the hind wing of U. haarupi this falls within the variation visible for U. fidalgoi ( Fig. 1–2 View FIGURES 1 – 9 ). Traver’s (1959) concept of U. haarupi and Thew's description of Deleatidium vittatum match Ulmeritoides fidalgoi exactly—with the single exception that Thew did not mention the extent of shading on the ventral base of the metathoracic femora. As the extent of this shading seems to be the only character separating these species, and it is often undescribed or variable, we consider U. haarupi , D. vittatum , and U. fidalgoi to be conspecific, with Ulmeritoides haarupi the senior name.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Ulmeritoides haarupi (EsbenPetersen)
Peters, J. G., Flowers, R. W., Hubbard, M. D., Domínguez, E. & Savage, H. M. 2005 |
Ulmeritoides fidalgoi Domínguez, 1995 :23
Dominguez 1995: 23 |
Ulmeritus (Ulmeritus) haarupi
Dominguez 1991: 160 |
Thew 1960: 123 |
Thew 1960: 130 |
Traver 1959: 5 |
Thraulus haarupi EsbenPetersen, 1912 :337
Traver 1946: 423 |
Ulmer 1920: 115 |
Navas 1917: 188 |
Esben-Petersen 1912: 337 |