Opeatocerata rubida (Wheeler & Melander)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3846.4.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:71A80CC3-CDC1-4291-863B-FA7501D60AF5 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5285279 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F6943F-E06B-FF82-C7C7-FF7DA94B157A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Opeatocerata rubida (Wheeler & Melander) |
status |
|
Opeatocerata rubida (Wheeler & Melander) View in CoL
( Figs 145–151 View FIGURES 145 – 151 )
Empis rubida Wheeler & Melander, 1901: 368 View in CoL ; Melander, 1902: 302 (fig. wing); Bezzi, 1909: 348 (cit.). Opeatocerata rubida: Melander, 1928: 135 View in CoL ; Smith, 1967: 18 (cat.); Smith, 1989: 512 (redescription); Yang et al., 2007: 146 (cat.); Cumming & Sinclair, 2009: 668 (cit.); Câmara & Rafael, 2011: 37 (cit.).
Diagnosis. Dark yellow species ( Fig. 145 View FIGURES 145 – 151 ) except for brown anterolateral and posterior margins on segments 8 and 10 ( Figs 148, 150 View FIGURES 145 – 151 ); fore tarsomeres black ( Fig. 147 View FIGURES 145 – 151 ); sternite 8 with anterolateral angles and acute apex brown ( Fig. 150 View FIGURES 145 – 151 ); and genital fork with base longer than wide and arms separated at apex ( Fig. 149 View FIGURES 145 – 151 ).
Re-description. Female ( Fig. 145 View FIGURES 145 – 151 ). Head: Frons dark brown, shiny, as wide as superior margin of the face. Face dark brown, shiny, slightly convergent toward the proboscis, about 2X longer than lower width. Ocellar tubercle dark brown with gray pruinescence; ocelli brown. Antenna brown; postpedicel about 1.5X longer than pedicel; stylus about 2X longer than first flagellomere. Proboscis yellow, slightly longer than head height. Thorax dark yellow, shiny ( Fig. 145 View FIGURES 145 – 151 ). Legs predominantly yellow with bristles of varying length; fore tarsi black; hind femur with apical black ring; hind tibia with black distal third, mid and hind legs with apex of tarsomere 1 and tarsomeres 2–5 black ( Fig. 147 View FIGURES 145 – 151 ). Wing ( Fig. 146 View FIGURES 145 – 151 ) hyaline; pterostigma brown, conspicuously, about 3.5X longer than wide. Halter yellow. Abdomen ( Fig. 145 View FIGURES 145 – 151 ) dark yellow, except anterolateral and posterior margins on segments 8 and 10 brown ( Figs 148, 150 View FIGURES 145 – 151 ); bristles yellow, longer laterally in all segments and scattered on tergites and sternites 8 and 10. Terminalia: Tergite 8 subrectangular with brown apex and concave posterior margin ( Fig. 150 View FIGURES 145 – 151 ). Sternite 8 with wider and concave base and acute apex; anterolateral angle and apex brown ( Fig. 150 View FIGURES 145 – 151 ). Genital fork with base longer than wide ( Fig. 149 View FIGURES 145 – 151 ); arms separated at apex. Tergite 10 undivided, about half the length of tergite 8 ( Fig. 150 View FIGURES 145 – 151 ). Sternite 10 with straight base and slightly bilobed at apex ( Fig. 150 View FIGURES 145 – 151 ). Receptacle of spermatheca spherical ( Fig. 51 View FIGURES 47 – 57 ). Specimen length: 4.0 mm; wing length: 4.5 mm. Male. Unknown.
Geographical distribution. Mexico ( Fig. 211 View FIGURE 211 ).
Type material. HOLOTYPE ♀, labelled: Mexico, Chilpanchingo, Guerrero, 4600 ft. june. H. H. Smith ( BMNH).
Holotype condition. Left ocellar bristle and right antenna lost; left foreleg and right hindleg lost; right wing on microslide and left in plastic tube; abdomen in microtube with glycerin.
Remarks. Opeatocerata rubida differs from all other species that have females known by a combination of the following characters (in parentheses, the states in other species): fore tarsomeres black (only fore tarsomeres 3–5 or 4–5 brown to black), mid and hind legs with apex of tarsomere 1 and tarsomeres 2–5 black (only 4–5 brown to black); sternite 8 with anterolateral angles and apex brown (yellow) and acute apex (rounded); segment 10 brown (yellow).
Comments. Opeatocerata rubida was recorded for Costa Rica (1 ♀) and Panama (1 ♀) by Melander (1928) and Bolivia (2 ♀) by Bezzi (1909). Smith (1989) examined these specimens and noted that they were not O. rubida . Smith (1989) stated that the specimens from Costa Rica and Panama were lighter, smaller, with hyaline, long and narrow wings; the specimen from Costa Rica had a darker abdomen and the one from Panama had abdominal spots. Furthermore, the two specimens from Bolivia did not have spots on the abdomen, had infuscated brown wings, and were more similar to O. lopesi than O. rubida . Therefore, specimens from Costa Rica, Panama and Bolivia are not considered conspecific with O. rubida and consequently the latter species is recorded so far only from Mexico.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Opeatocerata rubida (Wheeler & Melander)
Câmara, J. T. & Rafael, J. A. 2014 |
Empis rubida
Camara 2011: 37 |
Cumming 2009: 668 |
Yang 2007: 146 |
Smith 1989: 512 |
Smith 1967: 18 |
Melander 1928: 135 |
Bezzi 1909: 348 |
Melander 1902: 302 |
Wheeler 1901: 368 |