Opeatocerata lopesi Smith
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3846.4.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:71A80CC3-CDC1-4291-863B-FA7501D60AF5 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5285247 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F6943F-E060-FF88-C7C7-FF7DAD0A1756 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Opeatocerata lopesi Smith |
status |
|
Opeatocerata lopesi Smith View in CoL
( Figs 100–113 View FIGURES 100 – 108 View FIGURES 109 – 113 )
Opeatocerata lopesi Smith, 1989: 514 View in CoL ; Yang et al., 2007: 146 (cat.); Câmara & Rafael, 2011: 37 (cit.).
Diagnosis. Yellow species; anterior cercus of the male terminalia with proclinate dorsal projection in lateral view ( Figs 102, 103 View FIGURES 100 – 108 ) and with descendant plate subrectangular in posterior view ( Fig. 105 View FIGURES 100 – 108 ); phallus subcylindrical with dorsal, subapical, narrow appendix, best visualized in lateral view ( Fig. 107 View FIGURES 100 – 108 ), and spiniform projections, more conspicuous in ventral view ( Fig. 108 View FIGURES 100 – 108 ); genital fork with arms fused at apex ( Fig. 112 View FIGURES 109 – 113 ); tergite 10 undivided ( Fig. 111 View FIGURES 109 – 113 ).
R e-description. Male ( Fig. 100 View FIGURES 100 – 108 ). Head: Face parallel-sided, brown with gray pruinescence in ventral view, about 5X longer than lower width. Ocellar tubercle with brown pruinescence; ocelli brown. Scape and pedicel yellow with black bristles; postpedicel light brown, about 1.5X longer than pedicel; stylus about 2X longer than postpedicel. Proboscis yellow shorter than head height. Thorax yellow ( Fig. 100 View FIGURES 100 – 108 ), shiny, with pleural sutures slightly darker. Legs yellow except hind tibia and femur with apical brown ring and all tarsomeres 4–5 black. Wing ( Fig. 101 View FIGURES 100 – 108 ) hyaline;pterostigma brown, conspicuous, about 2X longer than wide. Halter yellow. Abdomen yellow, shiny ( Figs 100, 102 View FIGURES 100 – 108 ); tergite 8 divided in two subrectangular plates; sternite 8 divided in two trapezoidal plates. Terminalia: Anterior cercus with proclinate dorsal projection in lateral view ( Figs 102, 103 View FIGURES 100 – 108 ) and with concave posterior margin in dorsal view ( Fig. 104 View FIGURES 100 – 108 ); descendant plate subrectangular, with lower margin slightly concave in posterior view ( Fig. 105 View FIGURES 100 – 108 ). Posterior cercus with rounded apex in lateral view, with dorsal projections, one pointed subbasally and other submedian and subtriangular in dorsal view ( Fig. 104 View FIGURES 100 – 108 ). Hypoproct rounded in lateral view ( Fig. 103 View FIGURES 100 – 108 ) and comma-shaped in posterior view ( Fig. 105 View FIGURES 100 – 108 ). Epandrial ventral lobe bilobed at apex, with spiniform bristles on dorsal lobe ( Fig. 103 View FIGURES 100 – 108 ) and longer bristles at apex of the ventral lobe ( Fig. 103 View FIGURES 100 – 108 ). Hypandrium wider than long, with V-shaped apex ( Fig. 108 View FIGURES 100 – 108 ) without long bristles. Phallus subcylindrical, longer than the hypandrium ( Figs 107, 108 View FIGURES 100 – 108 ), with dorsal subapical narrow appendix, best visualized in lateral view ( Fig. 107 View FIGURES 100 – 108 ) and spiniform projections, more conspicuous in ventral view ( Fig. 108 View FIGURES 100 – 108 ). Subepandrial sclerite wider than long and U-shaped ( Fig. 106 View FIGURES 100 – 108 ). Bacilliform sclerite folded and longer than subepandrial sclerite ( Fig. 106 View FIGURES 100 – 108 ). Specimen length: 3.1 mm; wing length: 3.2 mm. Female ( Fig. 109 View FIGURES 109 – 113 ): similar to male, except by brown frons wider than face. Face brown, about 4X longer than lower width. Terminalia: Tergite 8 subrectangular ( Figs 110, 111 View FIGURES 109 – 113 ). Sternite 8 with wider and concave base and rounded apex ( Fig. 111 View FIGURES 109 – 113 ). Genital fork with base longer than wide ( Fig. 112 View FIGURES 109 – 113 ); arms fused at apex. Tergite 10 undivided, less than half the length of tergite 8 ( Fig. 111 View FIGURES 109 – 113 ). Sternite 10 with straight base and slightly bilobed apex ( Fig. 111 View FIGURES 109 – 113 ). Receptacle of spermatheca spherical ( Figs 110, 113 View FIGURES 109 – 113 ). Specimen length: 2.9 mm; wing length: 3.0 mm.
Geographical distribution. Brazil (Mato Grosso) ( Fig. 211 View FIGURE 211 ).
Type material. HOLOTYPE ♂, labelled: Brasil, Mato Grosso, Base Camp. 12°50’S 51°45’W. 10–27.iii.1968. B. E. Freeman ( BMNH). Paratypes: Brazil, Mato Grosso. Idem / dry Forest (1 ♂, BMNH). Idem / gallery forest (1 ♀, BMNH).
Holotype condition. Ocellar bristles, postpedicel and right style lost; left midleg and right hindleg lost; acrostichal, dorsocentral, supra-alar, notopleural, scutellar and post-alar bristles lost, right wing on microslide; abdomen in microtube with glycerin.
Remarks. Opeatocerata lopesi is similar to O. nhamunda sp. nov. by the anterior cercus with subrectangular descendant plate ( Figs 105 View FIGURES 100 – 108 , 142 View FIGURES 138 – 144 ), posterior cercus with rounded apex ( Figs 103 View FIGURES 100 – 108 , 140 View FIGURES 138 – 144 ) and dorsal subbasal pointed projection ( Figs 104 View FIGURES 100 – 108 , 141 View FIGURES 138 – 144 ) and epandrial lobe with bilobed apex ( Figs 103 View FIGURES 100 – 108 , 140 View FIGURES 138 – 144 ). Differs from the latter by the posterior cercus with submedian subtriangular projection ( Fig. 104 View FIGURES 100 – 108 ), phallus with dorsal, suapical, narrow appendix ( Fig. 107 View FIGURES 100 – 108 ) and spiniform projection, conspicuous ventrally ( Fig. 108 View FIGURES 100 – 108 ) and hypandrium V-shaped at apex ( Fig.108 View FIGURES 100 – 108 ). In O. nhamunda sp. nov. the posterior cercus doesn’t have a submedian projection ( Fig. 141 View FIGURES 138 – 144 ), phallus doesn’t have a dorsal appendix and neither a spiniform projection ( Fig. 144 View FIGURES 138 – 144 ), and the hypandrium has a rounded apex.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Opeatocerata lopesi Smith
Câmara, J. T. & Rafael, J. A. 2014 |
Opeatocerata lopesi
Camara 2011: 37 |
Yang 2007: 146 |
Smith 1989: 514 |