Pholcus gonggarensis Yao & Li
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4170.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1BB4CDF3-C941-41CF-9987-CF9AFE0F71BD |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5328499 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F587F1-AF06-FFC6-0E94-FC59FCAB058B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pholcus gonggarensis Yao & Li |
status |
sp. nov. |
Pholcus gonggarensis Yao & Li View in CoL sp. nov.
Figs 13–14 View FIGURE 13 View FIGURE 14 , 27 View FIGURE 27 C–D
Type material. Holotype: male, Gonggar Town (29°04.824′N, 93°09.097′E, elevation 3184 m), Nang County, Nyingchi, Tibet, China, 11 August 2014, Y. Li leg GoogleMaps . Paratype: 1 female, same data as holotype GoogleMaps .
Etymology. The specific name refers to the type locality; adjective.
Diagnosis. This species resembles P. lijiangensis Yao & Li, 2012 (see Yao & Li 2012: 23, figs 102–105) with similar male chelicerae ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 D), appendix ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 C) and vulva ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 B) but can be distinguished by the long apophysis on male pedipalpal trochanter ( Figs 13 View FIGURE 13 A–B), by the presence of a wide, membranous prolateral process distally and the absence of thick prolateral spines subdistally on the procursus ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 C), by the distally strongly protruding uncus (arrow in Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 C) and by the epigynum blunt on the lateral margins (arrow in Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 A).
Description. Male (holotype): Total length 4.84 (5.20 with clypeus), carapace 1.44 long, 1.64 wide, opisthosoma 3.40 long, 1.56 wide. Leg I: 45.37 (11.28 + 0.79 + 11.41 + 19.64 + 2.25), leg II, leg III and leg IV missing; tibia I L/d: 71. Distance PME-PME 0.28; diameter PME 0.11; distance PME-ALE 0.05; distance AME- AME 0.08; diameter AME 0.08. Sternum wider than long (1.06/0.81). Habitus as in Figs 14 View FIGURE 14 E–F. Carapace yellowish, with radiating brown marks extending to ocular area; ocular area yellowish; sternum brown, with yellowish marks medially. Leg yellow, distal parts of femur and tibiae whitish, femora (subproximally and subdistally) and tibiae (subproximally and subdistally) with darker rings. Opisthosoma yellowish, with small spots dorsally and laterally. Ocular area elevated, without eye stalks ( Fig. 27 View FIGURE 27 C). Thoracic furrow absent. Chelicerae as in Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 D, with a pair of proximo-lateral apophyses, a pair of distal apophyses, and a pair of frontal apophyses. Pedipalps as in Figs 13 View FIGURE 13 A–B; trochanter with a ventral apophysis; femur with a distinct ventral ridge; tibia with a projection prolaterally; procursus simple proximally but complex distally, with a wide, membranous prolateral process distally; uncus with a scaly edge and distally strongly protruding (arrow in Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 C); appendix hooked, with a branch medially; embolus weakly sclerotized, with some transparent projections distally. Retrolateral trichobothrium of tibia I at 7%; legs with short vertical setae on tibiae, metatarsi and tarsi; without spines and curved setae; tarsus I with 26 distinct pseudosegments.
Female: Similar to male, habitus as in Figs 14 View FIGURE 14 G–H. Total length 4.35 (4.74 with clypeus), carapace 1.41 long, 1.42 wide, opisthosoma 2.94 long, 1.56 wide; tibia I: 9.49; tibia I L/d: 64. Distance PME-PME 0.23; diameter PME 0.11; distance PME-ALE 0.03; distance AME-AME 0.06; diameter AME 0.07. Sternum wider than long (1.01/ 0.81). Epigynum ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 A) with a knob. Vulva ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 B) with a sclerotized anterior arch and two nearly rounded pore plates.
Distribution. China (Tibet, type locality; Fig. 28 View FIGURE 28 ).
Natural History. The species was found on the rock walls.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.