Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.24349/acarologia/20204361 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E7376941-8C9E-44B1-82F5-00D4A010E079 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5055913 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F53B3D-FFA8-0346-74BF-FF66FC0F3CB9 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) |
status |
|
Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) View in CoL
Typhlodromus californicus McGregor 1954: 89 .
Amblyseius californicus, Schuster & Pritchard 1963: 271 .
Cydnodromus californicus, Athias-Henriot 1977: 62 .
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) californicus, Ueckermann & Loots 1988: 150 ; Ehara et al. 1994: 126.
Amblyseius (Neoseiulus) californicus, Ehara & Amano 1998: 33 .
Neoseiulus californicus, Moraes et al. 1986: 73 View in CoL ; Chant & McMurtry 2003a: 21; Moraes et al. 2004a: 109; Chant & McMurtry 2007: 25; Guanilo et al. 2008a: 27 View Cited Treatment , 2008b: 19 View Cited Treatment .
Neoseiulus chilenensis Dosse 1958: 55 View in CoL (synonymy according to McMurtry & Badii 1989). Neoseiulus mungeri McGregor 1954: 92 View in CoL (synonymy according to Schuster & Pritchard 1963). Neoseiulus wearnei Schicha 1987: 103 View in CoL (Synonymy according to Tixier et al. 2014).
Like the previous species, N. californicus belongs also to the cucumeris species group of Neoseiulus ( Chant and McMurtry 2003a) .
This widespread species (Moraes et al. 2004; Demite et al. 2019) is considered by McMurtry and Croft (1997) to be a specialized predator, Type 2. Nevertheless, it has characteristics of both specialist and generalist predatory mites ( Castagnoli and Simoni 2003). It prefers to feed on spider mites (Gomez et al. 2009), but can also consume other mite species like tarsonemid mites [ Phytonemus pallidus (Banks) ] ( Easterbrook et al. 2001), small insects such as thrips ( Rodriguez-Reina et al. 1992) and even pollen when the primary prey is unavailable ( Rhodes and Liburd 2006). It can migrate from grasses to fruit trees or grapevines and vice versa ( Auger et al. 1999). It is a specialist predator of T. urticae on annual plants and woody species, and of Panonychus ulmi (Koch) and various Tetranychus spp. (and perhaps eriophyid mites) on trees and less frequently on grapevines ( Auger et al. 1999). N. californicus is well-known as a BCA sold in many countries around the world for the management of spider mites in greenhouses but also in outdoor crops such as fruit crops in Europe. This is the first mention of that species for La Réunion Island.
Sources of measurements – Australia: Schicha (1977); -: not provided.
Specimens examined: 18 ♀♀ + 2 ♂♂ in total, 14 ♀♀ + 2 ♂♂ measured. Ravine des Cabris – Ligne des Bambous , Lassay (aasl 221 m, Long 55°29’38” E, Lat 21°17’17” S), GoogleMaps 1 ♀ on Amaranthus viridis L., 5/12/2016; Le Tampon – Grand Tampon (aasl 1100 m, Long 55°34’12” E, Lat 21°16’48” S), 6 ♀♀ + 1 ♂ on Cyperus rotundus L., 1 ♀ + 1 ♂ on Plantago lanceolata L. and 1 ♀ on Solanum mauritianum Scop. , 18/1/2017 GoogleMaps ; Montvert-les-Hauts – EARL Le Mont Vert farm (aasl 582 m, Long 55°32’19” E, Lat 21°19’42” S), 1 ♀ on Fragaria sp., 4/8/2015, 1 ♀ on C. annuum , 23/8/2016 GoogleMaps ; Le 19 e – Plaine des Caffres, JL Robert farm (aasl 1000 m, Long 55°32’9” E, Lat 21°14’16” S), 1 ♀ on Physalis peruviana L., and 2 ♀♀ on Emilia sonchifolia (L.) DC., 15/12/2015 GoogleMaps ; Saint-Pierre – Bassin-Plat CIRAD Research Station (aasl 153 m, Long 55°29’18” E, Lat 21°19’25” S), 4 ♀♀ in plots BM and CC, 4/4/2017 GoogleMaps .
Remarks: measurements of characters of the 14 female specimens ( Table 4 View Table 4 ) fit well with those obtained for populations of other countries, such as those obtained from Tixier et al. (2008).
Values of measurements of La Réunion specimens are generally only slightly smaller (few percents variations). The same remark can be addressed for the adult male specimens ( Table 4 View Table 4 ).
Comparisons with N. californicus measurements of a large number of female ( Table 4 View Table 4 ) specimens of various origins in Beaulieu and Beard (2018) shows shorter dimensions of all characters of La Réunion specimens (all ranges of La Réunion specimens are in the lower parts of the ranges mentioned by these authors).
This is interesting to notice that it is not the case for males ( Table 4 View Table 4 ), measurements of male specimens from La Réunion covering ranges or being in the middle of ranges mentioned by Beaulieu and Beard (2018) in their redescription.
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
CIRAD |
Centre de Cooperation Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Developpement |
BM |
Bristol Museum |
CC |
CSIRO Canberra Rhizobium Collection |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor)
Kreiter, Serge, Payet, Rose-My, Douin, Martial, Fontaine, Olivier, Jacques, Fillâtre & Bellec, Fabrice Le 2020 |
Amblyseius (Neoseiulus) californicus
Ehara S. & Amano H. 1998: 33 |
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) californicus
Ehara S. & Okada Y. & Kato H. 1994: 126 |
Ueckermann E. A. & Loots G. C. 1988: 150 |
Neoseiulus californicus
Guanilo A. D. & Moraes G. J. de & Knapp M. 2008: 27 |
Guanilo A. D. & Moraes G. J. de & Toledo S. & Knapp M. 2008: 19 |
Chant D. A. & McMurtry J. A. 2007: 25 |
Moraes G. J. de & McMurtry J. A. & Denmark H. A. & Campos C. B. 2004: 109 |
Chant D. A. & McMurtry J. A. 2003: 21 |
Moraes G. J. de & McMurtry J. A. & Denmark H. A. 1986: 73 |
Cydnodromus californicus
Athias-Henriot C. 1977: 62 |
Amblyseius californicus
Schuster R. O. & Pritchard A. E. 1963: 271 |
Neoseiulus chilenensis
Schicha E. 1987: 103 |
Dosse G. 1958: 55 |
McGregor E. A. 1954: 92 |
Typhlodromus californicus
McGregor E. A. 1954: 89 |