Fishermyia, Jason G. H. Londt, 2012
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5733/afin.053.0114 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:12A912F0-3937-474A-949C-9B41681FF65C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5690980 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0128F908-6F49-43AA-8068-7090A949BFD3 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:0128F908-6F49-43AA-8068-7090A949BFD3 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Fishermyia |
status |
gen. nov. |
Genus Fishermyia View in CoL gen. n.
Etymology: This genus is named for my much esteemed colleague Eric Fisher, whose knowledge of the Asilidae is legendary. Not only did he sort through many thousands of Malaise-trapped insects from Madagascar, but he immediately recognised the interest and importance of the material described in this paper. Feminine gender.
Type species: Fishermyia stuckenbergi View in CoL sp. n.
Diagnosis: Stenopogoninae with the following combination of characters: postpedicel more than 1.5× longer than scape and pedicel combined and bearing a distinct style made up of three elements, including a terminal “seta-like” element; mystacal setation confined to the ventral third of face; proepisternum fine setose (a few moderately developed setae are present, but these are never as strong as mesonotal macrosetae); scutellum with a single pair of apical macrosetae; postmetacoxal area entirely membranous and asetose; only abdominal T1 with a group of strong macrosetae dorsolaterally; ♂ terminalia fairly slender, never bulbous.
Key to genera of Afrotropical Stenopogoninae with setose anatergites (modified from Dikow & Londt (2000) to include Fishermyia ; it however excludes Oligopogon because of uncertainty of its subfamilial assignment)
1 Postpedicel (= third antennal segment) tipped with a small apical pit enclosing a “seta-like” sensory element....................................................................................8
– Postpedicel with a distinct terminal style made up of two or three elements (including a terminal “seta-like” element).............................................................2
2 Occiput with obvious macrosetae ..........................................................................4
– Occiput lacking macrosetae (i.e., with weak setae only).......................................3
3 Face relatively broad (eye:face-width ratio <1.1:1.0); scape clearly longer than pedicel; hypandrium less than half as long as epandrial lobes (western southern Africa) ............................................................................. Dioctobroma Hull, 1962 View in CoL
– Face relatively narrow (eye:face-width ratio>1.3:1.0); scape and pedicel about equal in length; hypandrium about as long as epandrial lobes (D.R. Congo).......... ........................................................................................... Dogonia Oldroyd, 1970 View in CoL
4 Proepisternum with a few strong macrosetae as well as fine setae; pronotal and mesonotal macrosetae very strong (flies have bristly appearance) (western southern Africa) ............................................................................ Anasillomos Londt, 1983 View in CoL
– Proepisternum with fine setae (some may be moderately developed, but never as strong as mesonotal macrosetae); pronotal and mesonotal macrosetae moderately developed ...............................................................................................................5
5 Abdominal T1–4 with groups of strong macrosetae dorsolaterally; antennal style consisting of two elements (one small basal segment and a “seta-like” sensory element); ♂ genitalia bulbous; ♀ T7 and T8 of nearly equal length ( western southern Africa ) ................................................................ Ontomyia Dikow & Londt, 2000
– Only abdominal T1 with groups of strong macrosetae dorsolaterally; antennal style consisting of three elements (two basal segments and a “seta-like” sensory element); ♂ genitalia slender, never bulbous; ♀ T8 distinctly shorter than T7 (♀ of Fishermyia View in CoL unknown)........................................................................................6
6 Facial swelling pronounced both in lower and upper regions (southern Africa) ..... ................................................................................... Oratostylum Ricardo, 1925 View in CoL
– Facial swelling weak, only lower margin moderately pronounced........................7
7 Two or more pairs of apical scutellar macrosetae; mystax occupying almost entire face although sometimes weak in dorsal part; antennal postpedicel usually somewhat clavate, <1.5× longer than scape and pedicel combined (western southern Africa) .......................................................................... Remotomyia Londt, 1983 View in CoL
– A single pair of apical scutellar macrosetae; mystax occupying ventral third of face only, dorsal part asetose; antennal postpedicel elongate, spindle shaped,>1.5× longer than scape and pedicel combined (Madagascar)........... Fishermyia View in CoL gen. n.
8 Facial swelling occupying approx. three-quarters of face and entirely covered with macrosetae and setae; presutural dorsocentral setae well developed; M 1 not strongly arched anteriorly; postmetacoxal membrane covered with long setae (southern Africa) ................................................................................. Daspletis Loew, 1858 View in CoL
– Facial swelling occupying at most half of face and often with macrosetae only on lower half; dorsocentral setae present only on posterior part of mesonotum; M 1 usually strongly arched anteriorly; postmetacoxal membrane usually asetose (widespread throughout the afrotropics) ................. Microstylum Macquart, 1838 View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.