Machaerus oxyacanthus ( Monod, 1956 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.2375.1.1 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F487A8-3911-4275-7D8C-FCC5F630FE21 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Machaerus oxyacanthus ( Monod, 1956 ) |
status |
|
Machaerus oxyacanthus ( Monod, 1956) View in CoL
( Figs. 30A–G View FIGURE 30 ; 32C–F View FIGURE 32 )
? Pilumnoplax sp. Cano 1889a: 91 [unknown location].? Pilumnoplax incerta Cano, 1889b: 228 View in CoL , pl. 7, fig. 14 [unknown location]. Pilumnoplax atlantica View in CoL — Balss 1922b: 76 [ Liberia, Ivory Coast, Equatorial Guinea]. — Monod 1933: 533, fig. 19A, 20,
21E [ Mauritania]. — Capart 1951: 166, fig. 63 [ Gabon, Cabinda, Congo-RC]. [not Machaerus atlanticus ( Miers,
1881)] Pilumnoplax oxyacantha Monod, 1956: 340 [in key], 346, figs. 450–455 [ Senegal, Ghana]. — Forest & Guinot 1966: 85
[ Guinea, Sierra Leone, Liberia, (?) Equatorial Guinea]. — Guinot 1969b: 517, 518 [discussion]; 1969c: 688 [discussion].
“ Pilumnoplax View in CoL ” oxyacantha — Guinot 1969b: 507, 508 [discussion], figs. 38, 42, 54, 55 [ Senegal].
[ Pilumnoplax View in CoL ] oxyacantha — Guinot 1971: 1081 [in list].
Machaerus oxyacantha View in CoL — Manning & Holthuis 1981: 163 [references] [ Ivory Coast, Ghana, Benin, Nigeria].
Machaerus oxyacanthus View in CoL — Ng et al. 2008: 78 [in list].
Type material. Unknown status [given as “ MP ” by Monod (1956: 346) but not in MNHN] .
Type locality. Senegal, unknown location .
Material examined. Guinea. Calypso , stn. 9, 18– 30 m, 18.05.1956: 5 males , 2 pre-adult females, 7 females ( MNHN-B10243 ) .
Sierra Leone. Calypso , stn. 11, 34– 30 m, 19.05.1956: 1 male , 19.0 mm × 30.3 mm, 1 male, 2 pre-adult females, 3 females ( MNHN-B10242 ) .
Gulf of Guinea. Identified as “ Frevillea rosaea ”: 1 male, 26.1 mm × 16.9 mm ( NHM 1850.32 ) .
Congo-RC. Pointe Noir, 25 m, mud, A. Crosnier coll., 05.1963: 2 males, 11.6 mm × 27.2 mm, 22.5 mm × 35.8 mm ( MNHN-B10231 ) .
Diagnosis. Anterolateral teeth acute, different from triangular outer orbital teeth, second tooth much longer, more elevated than first ( Fig. 30A, B View FIGURE 30 ).
Remarks. Differences between M. oxyacanthus and its only (and apparently sympatric) congener, M. atlanticus , are given in the Remarks for the latter. Unusual for a euryplacid, M. oxyacanthus has been collected in brackish water ( Manning & Holthuis 1981: 163).
On the basis of the description and a rather simple figure ( Cano, 1889b: 228, pl. 7, fig. 14), Pilumnoplax incerta Cano, 1889 , is likely to be a senior synonym of M. oxyacanthus . This suggestion had already been made by Ahyong (2008: 54) and Ng et al. (2008: 84). The species is certainly not a Pilumnoplax Stimpson, 1858 (a junior synonym of Eucrate De Haan, 1835 ) as understood here, or a Neopilumnoplax Serène, 1969 (see Ahyong 2008; Tavares & Melo in press). Cano’s (1889b) species is only known from the small (“ 6 mm × 8mm ”) holotype, which was obtained from an unknown location, and its whereabouts are uncertain. As Cano’s (1889a, b) material was from all over the world, with the bulk from the Atlantic, it is possible that the specimen of P. incerta was obtained from somewhere in the western Atlantic where M. oxyacanthus is found. For now, we defer from synonymising the two species until more information can be obtained.
Distribution. Atlantic coast of Africa from Senegal to Angola ( Manning & Holthuis 1981). Depth: 7–73 m ( Manning & Holthuis 1981).
Genus Nancyplax Lemaitre, García-Gómez, von Sternberg & Campos, 2001
Nancyplax Lemaitre et al. 2001: 952 View in CoL . — Karasawa & Kato, 2003a: 151 [in list]; 2003b: 139 [in list]. — Ng & Castro 2007: 44 [in list]. — Ng et al. 2008: 78 [in list]. — De Grave et al. 2009: 33 [in list].
Diagnosis. Carapace ( Fig. 31A View FIGURE 31 ) quadrate, slightly wider than long, dorsal surface smooth (except granules on hepatic region) without clear indication of regions; anterolateral borders arched; front wide, with small median notch. One conspicuous, acute anterolateral tooth posterior to simple, unarmed outer orbital angle. Orbits short, shorter than front ( Fig. 31B, C View FIGURE 31 ); 2 notches on thin supraorbital border; thin, sinuous suborbital border, inner suborbital tooth absent ( Fig. 31C View FIGURE 31 ); eye peduncles short, nearly as long as corneas; large, spherical corneas ( Fig. 31B, C View FIGURE 31 ). Basal antennal article immobile, disto-lateral process absent but orbital hiatus is closed excluding antennal flagellum from orbit ( Fig. 32B, C View FIGURE 32 ; Lemaitre et al. 2001: fig. 2a). Anteroexternal margin of third maxilliped merus angular. Stridulating ridge on pterygostomian region ( Lemaitre et al. 2001: fig. 2a). Cheliped fingers moderately slender, slightly shorter than propodus, light in colour ( Fig. 31E View FIGURE 31 ); carpus with acute tooth on inner margin; sparse setae on outer margin of propodus, carpus ( Lemaitre et al. 2001: fig. 3f); stridulating ridge on proximal margin of merus ( Lemaitre et al. 2001: figs. 2a, 3f). Dorsal margins of ambulatory legs (P2–P5) meri, carpi, propodi unarmed, dactyli slender, smooth, setose. P5 propodus, dactylus long, slender, fringed with long setae ( Lemaitre et al. 2001: fig. 4d). Thoracic sternum ( Fig. 31D, F, G View FIGURE 31 ) wide; thoracic suture 2/3 complete, straight ( Fig. 31D View FIGURE 31 ); 3/4 deep, short, interrupted; 4/5, 5/6, 6/7, 7/8 interrupted ( Fig. 31F, G View FIGURE 31 ); median groove on thoracic sternites 7, 8. Sterno-abdominal cavity of male deep, reaching anterior margin of sternite 4 ( Fig. 31D, F View FIGURE 31 ). Press-button of male abdominal-locking mechanism as large tubercle near thoracic suture 4/5 ( Fig. 31D View FIGURE 31 ) (presence in pre-adult females unknown). Male abdomen proportionally wide, triangular (not T-shaped), telson wider than long ( Fig. 32G View FIGURE 32 ); somite 3 only slightly transversely wider than somites 4–6, somite 3 not reaching inner margins of P5 coxae or episternite 7, small portion on each side of thoracic sternite 8 left exposed by closed abdomen (( Lemaitre et al. 2001: fig. 2b), somite 2 transversely shorter than somite 3 ( Lemaitre et al. 2001: fig. 2b). G1 long, slender, slightly sinuous, thin distal part, acuminate apex, with small, relatively few denticles ( Fig. 32H, I View FIGURE 32 ); G2 less than one-third of G1, straight, apex with 2 processes, one much longer, larger ( Fig. 32J, K View FIGURE 32 ). Male genital opening (gonopore) coxal ( Fig. 31F View FIGURE 31 ); coxosternal disposition of long penis, protected by slightly convex posterior portion of thoracic sternite 7. Vulva relatively large, ovoid, transverse on median portion of sternite 6, extending across median half of sternite ( Fig. 31G View FIGURE 31 ); covered by soft membrane, sternal vulvar cover absent.
Type species. Nancyplax vossi Lemaitre, García-Gómez, von Sternberg & Campos, 2001 View in CoL (by original designation, gender feminine).
Diagnosis. One long, acute tooth on each anterolateral border of carapace ( Fig. 31A–C View FIGURE 31 ). Outer orbital tooth absent ( Fig. 31B, C View FIGURE 31 ).
Remarks. As in some of the other Western Atlantic and tropical Eastern Pacific genera of euryplacids, the male abdomen of Nancyplax is triangular in shape ( Fig. 32G View FIGURE 32 ), not narrow and T-shaped (see Remarks for Euryplacidae ). The G2 departs from the typical euryplacid G2 by having an apex that consists of one large process and a much smaller one ( Fig. 32J View FIGURE 32 ) in contrast to other euryplacids, where the two processes are unequal but not as dissimilar as in Nancyplax . The sterno-abdominal cavity, however, is deep and relatively narrow, and the G1 slender as in other euryplacids. With the exception of sternal suture 5/6, which is interrupted as in Systroplax n. gen. and Xenocrate whereas complete in the remaining euryplacid genera, the other defining characters of Nancyplax agree with those of the family.
Species included. Nancyplax vossi Lemaitre, García-Gómez, von Sternberg & Campos, 2001 The genus is restricted to the Western Atlantic region.
MP |
Mohonk Preserve, Inc. |
MNHN |
Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Machaerus oxyacanthus ( Monod, 1956 )
CASTRO, PETER & NG, PETER K. L. 2010 |
Machaerus oxyacanthus
Ng, P. K. L. & Guinot, D. & Davie, P. 2008: 78 |
Nancyplax
De Grave, S. & Pentcheff, N. D. & Ahyong, S. T. & Chan, T-Y & Crandall, K. A. & Dworschak, P. C. & Felder, D. L. & Feldmann, R. M. & Fransen, C. H. J. M. & Goulding, L. Y. D. & Lemaitre, R. & Low, M. E. Y. & Martin, J. W. & Ng, P. K. L. & Schweitzer, C. E. & Tan, S. H. & Tshudy, D. & Wetzer, R. 2009: 33 |
Ng, P. K. L. & Guinot, D. & Davie, P. 2008: 78 |
Ng, P. K. L. & Castro, P. 2007: 44 |
Karasawa, H. & Kato, H. 2003: 151 |
Lemaitre, R. & Garcia-Gomez, J. & Von Sternberg, R. & Campos, N. H. 2001: 952 |
Machaerus oxyacantha
Manning, R. B. & Holthuis, L. B. 1981: 163 |
Pilumnoplax
Guinot, D. 1971: 1081 |
Pilumnoplax
Guinot, D. 1969: 507 |
Pilumnoplax sp.
Monod, T. 1933: 533 |
Balss, H. 1922: 76 |
Cano, G. 1889: 91 |
Cano, G. 1889: 228 |