ECHINORHINIDAE (PRICKLY SHARKS)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12309 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F387F7-FF99-8F14-3A7F-F8D2FCEDF8C0 |
treatment provided by |
Marcus (2021-08-29 06:05:57, last updated by Plazi 2023-11-05 13:14:55) |
scientific name |
ECHINORHINIDAE (PRICKLY SHARKS) |
status |
|
ECHINORHINIDAE (PRICKLY SHARKS) View in CoL View at ENA
Five specimens initially identified as Echinorhinus brucus formed a single cluster ( Fig. 2 View Figure 2 ). When com- pared with Echinorhinus brucus and Echinorhinus cookei specimens (the only recognized species in this family) reported by Naylor et al. (2012), the five Oman specimens formed a separate cluster ( Fig. 6 View Figure 6 ). Given their distinct separation, genetic distances were calculated between the Oman specimens and the Echinorhinus spp. reported by Naylor et al. (2012). The mean distance between the current specimens and E. brucus was 5.04 ± 0.70% while it was 5.23 ± 0.76% between the current specimens and E. cookei . By comparison, the mean distance between E. brucus and E. cookei was 6.07 ± 0.81%. Consequently, the Oman specimens have been labelled Echinorhinus sp.
Naylor GJP, Caira JN, Jensen K, Rosana KAM, White WT, Last PR. 2012. A DNA sequence-based approach to the identification of shark and ray species and its implications for global elasmobranch diversity and parasitology. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 367: 1 - 262.
Figure 2. Neighbour-joining tree for an 829-bp fragment of the NADH2 gene from 1487 elasmobranch specimens from south-eastern Arabia. Values in parentheses indicate sample size (n) and within-group mean genetic distance (D). Bootstrap values are based on 1000 replications and only values ≥ 95% are shown.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |