Costarina concinna (Chickering)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1206/3794.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5459274 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F387E9-FFCB-FFA5-FEF2-F997FD00FBAB |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Costarina concinna (Chickering) |
status |
|
Costarina concinna (Chickering) View in CoL ( Figures 417–427 View FIGURES 417–427 )
Dysderina concinna Chickering, 1968: 9 , figs. 13–19 (male holotype from Volcán , Chiriquí, Panama, in MCZ; examined).
Dysderina potena Chickering, 1968: 24 , figs. 50–52 (female holotype from Volcán , Chiriquí, Panama, in MCZ; examined). NEW SYNONYMY.
Costarina concinna: Platnick and Dupérré, 2011: 50 View in CoL .
Costarina potena: Platnick and Dupérré, 2011: 50 View in CoL .
DIAGNOSIS: T his appears to be a southern vicariant of the widespread species C. plena (cf. figs. 1–11); the two species have been collected together only in the Reserva Biológica Hitoy Cerere in Limón. Males have a much larger, wider, more rectangular proximal embolar prong (figs. 417–422) and females have a larger, less triangular genital atrium (figs. 426, 427).
MALE (PBI_OON 29753, figs. 417–422): Total length 2.22. Endite ventral process very short, tip heavily sclerotized; dorsal process long, narrow, tip widely separated from tip of ventral process. Femur II p0-0-2, r1-1-0; metatarsus I v2-2-2. Embolus proximal prong wide, flag shaped; distal prong long, bent only at apex (N = 2).
FEMALE (PBI_OON 29815, figs. 423–427): Total length 2.38. Spination typical. Genital atrium relatively large, almost completely filled with protuberant sclerotization, anterior margin rebordered (N = 4).
DISTRIBUTION: Southern Limón, southeastern Puntarenas, and northern Panama.
SYNONYMY: Chickering collected at Volcán, Chiriquí, Panama, from Aug. 9–14, 1950, and described five species of Dysderina based on specimens he captured there: three based exclusively on males, and two based exclusively on females. He recognized that the female holotype of D. potena “appears to be closely related to D. plena ,” so it is surprising that he did not match that specimen with the males of D. concinna , which closely resemble the males of C. plena . Both sexes have since been taken together in Panama.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Costarina concinna (Chickering)
Platnick, Norman I., Berniker, Lily & Víquez, Carlos 2014 |
Costarina concinna: Platnick and Dupérré, 2011: 50
Platnick, N. I. & N. Duperre 2011: 50 |
Costarina potena: Platnick and Dupérré, 2011: 50
Platnick, N. I. & N. Duperre 2011: 50 |
Dysderina concinna
Chickering, A. M. 1968: 9 |
Dysderina potena
Chickering, A. M. 1968: 24 |