Cinetodus Ogilby, 1898
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad078 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5D6C7EBF-E568-4100-9364-2DD357003878 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11282718 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F32B77-FFCF-FF88-0C79-FF59FF104AF9 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cinetodus Ogilby, 1898 |
status |
|
Cinetodus Ogilby, 1898 View in CoL View at ENA
( Figs 1–3 View Figure 1 View Figure 2 View Figure 3 , 42 View Figure 42 )
Type species: Arius froggatti Ramsay & Ogilby, 1886 .
Diagnosis
Mesethmoid median portion very narrow (2, 2> 0); extrascapular subtriangular (37, 1> 2); epioccipital contacting a small narrow area of diagonal crest associated with neural spine of fourth vertebra (44, 1> 0); vomer anterior margin very pronounced and acute (50, 0> 1); basioccipital lateral process absent with anterior and posterior portions equally developed (83, 1> 0); anteroventral portion of opercle subtrapezoidal, very long (127, 1> 0); metapterygoid one and one-half times longer than deep in perpendicular section (135, 1> 2); posterolateral processes of urohyal short (160, 1> 0); third basibranchial chalice shaped (168, 0> 1); upper (pharyngeal) tooth plate round, as wide as long (195, 1> 0); dorsal processes of upper (pharyngeal) tooth plate very short or absent (197, 1> 0); median crest associated with neural spine of fourth vertebra very high (202, 0> 1); Müllerian ramus robust (207, 0> 1); ventral surfaces of parapophyses of fifth and sixth vertebrae conspicuously concave (212, 0> 1); adipose fin long (222, 2> 1).
Ambiguousoptimization: Mesethmoidmedialnotchnarrowanddeep (1, 0> 1); lateral horn of lateral ethmoid compressed and spatulate (11, 0> 1); premaxilla very wide and short, as long as wide (120, 1> 3); posterior process of cleithrum very long (224, 0> 2).
Included species
Cinetodus froggatti Ramsay & Ogilby, 1886 .
Habitat and distribution: Fresh and brackish waters, southern New Guinea and northern Australia ( Fig. 38 View Figure 38 ).
Remarks
The results of the total-evidence analysis support the recognition of Cinetodus as previously defined by morphological and molecular data ( Marceniuk and Menezes 2007, Betancur–R. 2009, Marceniuk et al. 2012), with a new hypothesis of relationships.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.