Chama croceata Lamarck, 1819

Raines, Bret & Huber, Markus, 2012, 3217, Zootaxa 3217, pp. 1-106 : 66

publication ID

1175­5334

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5250701

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F187DA-6F16-FFCD-A394-881BFE4AFA54

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Chama croceata Lamarck, 1819
status

 

Chama croceata Lamarck, 1819 View in CoL

Figures 34 A–F

Chama croceata Lamarck, 1819: p. 96 View in CoL .

Chama croceata Lamarck, 1819 View in CoL — Huber, 2010: p. 282, figs. 10–12.

Chama imbricata Broderip, 1835, p. 304 View in CoL , pl. 39, fig. 2, non Lamarck, 1801

Chama imbricata Broderip, 1835 View in CoL — Oliver, 1992: p. 105, pl. 26.

Chama savignyi Jousseaume View in CoL in Lamy, 1921: p. 238 — Huber, 2010: p. 676.

Chama plinthota Cox, 1927: p. 98 View in CoL . (nom. nov.)

Chama plinthota Cox, 1927 View in CoL — Lamprell & Whitehead, 1992: pl. 24, fig. 152; Brook & Marshall, 1998: p. 213; Spencer et al., 2011: p. 1.

Chama ratoi Boshoff, 1965 p. 151 View in CoL , pl. 4, fig. 2— Kilburn, 1973: p. 708.

Chama View in CoL — Luke, 1995: p. 107. (Lot M 1452 in part)

Material examined. Several single valves (up to 47 mm in length) (BK), including valves collected by the 1957/58 Downwind Expedition ( SIO Benthic Collection, M1452), plus specimens from the Marquesas Islands ( MHU).

Diagnosis. Shell medium to large, occasionally subcircular but usually oblong. The LV is the lower attached valve. Specimens are usually dextral with the umbo pointing anteriorward, but occasionally sinistral with the umbo pointing posteriorward. Exterior surface of commarginal lamellose, and typically covered by incrustations. Typical dorsal ridge. Hinge strongly curved with broad folds and deep teeth. Color extremely variable from yellowish brown to greyish purple. In fresh specimens with the typical vertical or radial dark brown to orange marks below the dorsal ridge, continuing on the lower valve. Margins smooth.

Remarks. Some of the worn Chama material identified by Luke (1995) from the SIO Benthic Collection, M1452 ( Figs. 34 C–F) approaches the shape and ridge, but a firm identification is obviously impossible.

Chama croceata is often erroneously referred to as the preoccupied C. imbricata Broderip, 1835 , or its nom. nov. C. plinthota Cox, 1927 , as well as C. ratoi Boshoff, 1965 , described from Mozambique, and C. savignyi Jousseaume in Lamy, 1921, described from the Red Sea. However, all have proved to be consistent with the type material of C. croceata . Huber (2010: 676) clarified C. croceata type locality as the Red Sea.

The 47.3 mm specimen represents the largest bivalve ever found on Easter Island. Elsewhere, C. croceata grows to 100 mm.

Habitat. Occasionally found at several locations around EI, in sand and rubble, from 30–80 m.

Distribution. Chama croceata is known from the Red Sea to the Kermadec Islands, including the Marquesas Islands, Australia, and Norfolk Island, but is not known from the Hawaiian Islands. Easter Island is now considered a range extension— E5.

SIO

Scripps Institution of Oceanography

MHU

Makerere University

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Mollusca

Class

Bivalvia

Order

Venerida

Family

Chamidae

Genus

Chama

Loc

Chama croceata Lamarck, 1819

Raines, Bret & Huber, Markus 2012
2012
Loc

Chama croceata

Huber, M. 2010: 282
2010
Loc

Chama plinthota

Spencer, H. G. & Willan, R. C. & Marshall, B. & Murray, T. J. 2011: 1
Brook, F. J. & Marshall, B. A. 1998: 213
1998
Loc

Chama

Luke, S. R. 1995: 107
1995
Loc

Chama imbricata

Oliver, P. G. 1992: 105
1992
Loc

Chama ratoi

Kilburn, R. N. 1973: 708
1973
Loc

Chama plinthota

Cox, L. R. 1927: 98
1927
Loc

Chama savignyi

Huber, M. 2010: 676
Lamy, E. 1921: 238
1921
Loc

Chama imbricata

Broderip, W. J. 1835: 304
1835
Loc

Chama croceata

Lamarck, J. B. P. A. de 1819: 96
1819
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF