Akanthophoreus
Bird, Graham J, 2007, Family incertae cedis *, Zootaxa 1599, pp. 121-149 : 140-141
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.178710 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3510708 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F187A3-FFFF-0379-FF57-FA55129DFEEA |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Akanthophoreus |
status |
|
Akanthophoreus View in CoL sp. KK#5
Figures 15–16 View FIGURE 15 View FIGURE 16
Material examined. 1 non-ovigerous female (3.6 mm), station XR-5, 42°23.83’– 42°22.06’N 145°31.06’– 145°27.70’E, 3145–3265 metres, 16 September 2001.
Remarks. This is an elongate species ( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 15 A), 7.8 (contracted) - 8.7 (stretched) times as long as broad, with a long cephalothorax (1.47 times as long as broad), no pleotelson spurs and only low pleonal sternal processes ( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 15 B). A potentially significant-useful character is the presence of two setae on the pleonite 3 lateral margin. The antennule ( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 15 C) is slender but is only 0.72 times as long as the cephalothorax. The cheliped ( Fig. 16 View FIGURE 16 A) is relatively ‘ordinary’, but has two distinct spurs on the dorsal crest of the propodus ( Fig. 16 View FIGURE 16 B), weak dorsal crenulation on the dactylus, and a distinct, but weak, carpal shield. Pereopods 1–3 ( Fig. 16 View FIGURE 16 C) are slender, with sparse minor setation, with a long dactylus/unguis (almost as long as propodus). The posterior pereopods ( Fig. 16 View FIGURE 16 D) are unremarkable, but pereopod 6 has three dorso-distal spiniform setae. Akanthophoreus sp.KK#5 has slender uropods, with a long basal article that is weakly crenulate on the dorsal margin ( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 15 E).
The closest taxonomic or phylogenetic affinities of this species are not clear but it approaches A. multiserratus in general shape and setation, if not in the degree of cheliped crenulation.
Distribution. Kurile-Kamchatka Trench, 3145–3265 metres.
(restricted synonymy and bibliography)
Chauliopleona Dojiri & Sieg, 1987: 231 View in CoL . Guerrero-Kommritz, 2005: 11 View Cited Treatment –79–1180. Larsen & Shimomura, 2007: 31 View Cited Treatment –32. Leptognathia G.O. Sars, 1882 View in CoL (partim): Hansen, 1913: 79 –82 (for species amdrupii, armata View in CoL and hastata View in CoL listed below). Type species: Chauliopleona dentata Dojiri & Sieg, 1997 View in CoL by monotypy.
Species included (Japanese waters, Kurile-Kamchatka Trench and the Japan Trench species in bold): C. amfti Guerrero-Kommritz, 2005 , Angola Basin; C. armata ( Hansen, 1913) View in CoL [?], NE Atlantic; C. amdrupi ( Hansen, 1913) , Arctic, NW & NE Atlantic; C. dentata View in CoL , California; C. hansknechti Sieg & Shimomura, 2007 View in CoL ; C. hastata ( Hansen, 1913) View in CoL , Arctic Ocean; C. nickeli Guerrero-Kommritz, 2005 View in CoL , Weddel Sea; C. paradoxa Guerrero-Kommritz, 2005 View in CoL , Peru Basin.
Diagnosis. See Larsen & Shimomura 2007.
Remarks. Although the type species of the genus C. dentata was described from Californian waters, the most familiar names are those formerly of Hansen’s Leptognathia group “a”, subdivision ‘ γ ’, characterized by a sternal spur on pleonite 5. A revision of the genus by Guerrero-Kommritz (2005) added several new species and confirmed the distinct identity of C. armata and C. hastata that had been considered to be synonymous by several authorities. Recently, Larsen & Shimomura (2007) have described a shallow-water Japanese species, C. hansknechti , and commented that the genus may belong to the family Leptognathiidae . Whichever family Chauliopleona is eventually assigned to, after a phylogenetic analysis, it will be the same as that for Akanthophoreus .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Akanthophoreus
Bird, Graham J 2007 |