Akanthophoreus

Bird, Graham J, 2007, Family incertae cedis *, Zootaxa 1599, pp. 121-149 : 140-141

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.178710

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3510708

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F187A3-FFFF-0379-FF57-FA55129DFEEA

treatment provided by

Plazi (2016-04-06 01:29:56, last updated 2023-10-25 16:59:16)

scientific name

Akanthophoreus
status

 

Akanthophoreus View in CoL sp. KK#5

Figures 15–16 View FIGURE 15 View FIGURE 16

Material examined. 1 non-ovigerous female (3.6 mm), station XR-5, 42°23.83’– 42°22.06’N 145°31.06’– 145°27.70’E, 3145–3265 metres, 16 September 2001.

Remarks. This is an elongate species ( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 15 A), 7.8 (contracted) - 8.7 (stretched) times as long as broad, with a long cephalothorax (1.47 times as long as broad), no pleotelson spurs and only low pleonal sternal processes ( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 15 B). A potentially significant-useful character is the presence of two setae on the pleonite 3 lateral margin. The antennule ( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 15 C) is slender but is only 0.72 times as long as the cephalothorax. The cheliped ( Fig. 16 View FIGURE 16 A) is relatively ‘ordinary’, but has two distinct spurs on the dorsal crest of the propodus ( Fig. 16 View FIGURE 16 B), weak dorsal crenulation on the dactylus, and a distinct, but weak, carpal shield. Pereopods 1–3 ( Fig. 16 View FIGURE 16 C) are slender, with sparse minor setation, with a long dactylus/unguis (almost as long as propodus). The posterior pereopods ( Fig. 16 View FIGURE 16 D) are unremarkable, but pereopod 6 has three dorso-distal spiniform setae. Akanthophoreus sp.KK#5 has slender uropods, with a long basal article that is weakly crenulate on the dorsal margin ( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 15 E).

The closest taxonomic or phylogenetic affinities of this species are not clear but it approaches A. multiserratus in general shape and setation, if not in the degree of cheliped crenulation.

Distribution. Kurile-Kamchatka Trench, 3145–3265 metres.

(restricted synonymy and bibliography)

Chauliopleona Dojiri & Sieg, 1987: 231 View in CoL . Guerrero-Kommritz, 2005: 11 View Cited Treatment –79–1180. Larsen & Shimomura, 2007: 31 View Cited Treatment –32. Leptognathia G.O. Sars, 1882 View in CoL (partim): Hansen, 1913: 79 –82 (for species amdrupii, armata View in CoL and hastata View in CoL listed below). Type species: Chauliopleona dentata Dojiri & Sieg, 1997 View in CoL by monotypy.

Species included (Japanese waters, Kurile-Kamchatka Trench and the Japan Trench species in bold): C. amfti Guerrero-Kommritz, 2005 , Angola Basin; C. armata ( Hansen, 1913) View in CoL [?], NE Atlantic; C. amdrupi ( Hansen, 1913) , Arctic, NW & NE Atlantic; C. dentata View in CoL , California; C. hansknechti Sieg & Shimomura, 2007 View in CoL ; C. hastata ( Hansen, 1913) View in CoL , Arctic Ocean; C. nickeli Guerrero-Kommritz, 2005 View in CoL , Weddel Sea; C. paradoxa Guerrero-Kommritz, 2005 View in CoL , Peru Basin.

Diagnosis. See Larsen & Shimomura 2007.

Remarks. Although the type species of the genus C. dentata was described from Californian waters, the most familiar names are those formerly of Hansen’s Leptognathia group “a”, subdivision ‘ γ ’, characterized by a sternal spur on pleonite 5. A revision of the genus by Guerrero-Kommritz (2005) added several new species and confirmed the distinct identity of C. armata and C. hastata that had been considered to be synonymous by several authorities. Recently, Larsen & Shimomura (2007) have described a shallow-water Japanese species, C. hansknechti , and commented that the genus may belong to the family Leptognathiidae . Whichever family Chauliopleona is eventually assigned to, after a phylogenetic analysis, it will be the same as that for Akanthophoreus .

Dojiri, M. & Sieg, J. (1997) The Tanaidacea. In Blake, J. A. and Scott, P. H. (eds) Taxonomic atlas of the benthic fauna of the Santa Maria Basin and western Santa Barbara Channel Volume 11 - The Crustacea Part 2. The Isopoda, Cumacea and Tanaidacea. Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, pp. 181 - 268.

Guerrero-Kommritz, J. (2005) Review of the genus Chauliopleona Dojiri & Sieg, 1997 (Crustacea, Peracarida, Tanaidacea) and description of three new species. Journal of Natural History, 39, 1177 - 1210.

Hansen, H. J. (1913) Crustacea Malacostraca, II, IV, The Order Tanaidacea. Danish Ingolf Expedition, 3 (3), 1 - 145.

Larsen, K. & Shimomura, M. (2007) Tanaidacea (Crustacea: Peracarida) from Japan. II. Tanaidomorpha from the East China Sea, the West Pacific Ocean and the Nansei Islands. Zootaxa, 1464, 1 - 43.

Sars, G. O. (1882) Revision af Gruppen: Isopoda Chelifera med Characteristik af nye herben horende Arter og Slaegter. Archiv for Matematik og Naturvidenskab, 7, 1 - 54.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 15. Akanthophoreus sp. KK # 5. A, non-ovigerous female, habitus; B, pleon and uropods, lateral view (pleopods omitted for clarity); C, right antennule, lateral view, setation simplified for clarity; D, cheliped basis and posterior sclerite; E, uropod. Scale bar = 1 mm for A, 0.5 mm for B, 0.21 mm for C-E.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 16. Akanthophoreus sp. KK # 5. Non-ovigerous female. A, right cheliped; B, right cheliped propodal crest and base of dactylus, dorsal view; C, perepod 1; D, pereopod 6. Scale bar = 0.25 mm for A-D.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Malacostraca

Order

Tanaidacea

Family

Akanthophoreidae