Pholcophora papanoa Huber, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2023.880.2173 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3F806FD6-2EB3-456A-AFD7-780A0FBEB2DA |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8155482 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C2E5858B-2822-4630-BCEC-D34864087C0A |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:C2E5858B-2822-4630-BCEC-D34864087C0A |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Pholcophora papanoa Huber |
status |
sp. nov. |
Pholcophora papanoa Huber sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:C2E5858B-2822-4630-BCEC-D34864087C0A
Figs 3F–G View Fig , 14– 18 View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig , 33E–F View Fig
Diagnosis
Distinguished from similar congeners ( P. mazatlan sp. nov., P. mexcala , P. americana ) by shape of male bulbal process ( Fig. 15F–H View Fig ; distinctive dorsal process, without ventral flap) and by shape of male cheliceral apophyses ( Fig. 15A–B View Fig ; long, directed upwards, without or with barely visible proximal humps); from very similar P. mazatlan also by main element of procursus more truncated ( Fig. 15E View Fig ), by male cheliceral apophyses less strongly directed upwards, and by thicker male leg femora (0.28–0.30 vs 0.18–0.20). From P. americana also by tip of procursus (semi-transparent process not widening distally) and by shape of epigynum ( Fig. 16 View Fig ; main epigynal plate posteriorly straight).
Etymology
The species name is derived from the type locality; noun in apposition.
Type material
Holotype MEXICO – Guerrero • ♂; ~ 5 km S of Papanoa ; 17.2711° N, 101.0328° W; 75 m a.s.l.; 4 Oct. 2019; B.A. Huber and A. Valdez-Mondragón leg.; low forest, leaf litter; LATLAX. GoogleMaps
Paratypes MEXICO – Guerrero • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype; ZFMK Ar 23945 GoogleMaps .
Other material examined
MEXICO – Guerrero • 3 ♀♀, 1 juv., in pure ethanol (one female used for SEM); same collection data as for holotype; ZFMK Mex216 GoogleMaps • 3 ♀♀ abdomens, together with paratypes (prosomata used for molecular work); same collection data as for holotype; ZFMK Ar 23945 GoogleMaps • 2 ♂♂ (partly used for µ-CT study); same collection data as for holotype; ZFMK Ar 23947 GoogleMaps • 1 ♂ (partly used for karyotype analysis); same collection data as for holotype; ZFMK Ar 23948 GoogleMaps .
Description
Male (holotype)
MEASUREMENTS. Total body length 2.4, carapace width 1.05. Distance PME-PME 60 µm; diameter PME 70 µm; distance PME-ALE 30 µm; distance AME-AME 20 µm; diameter AME 40 µm. Leg 1: 5.30 (1.50 + 0.40 + 1.30 + 1.55 + 0.55), tibia 2: 1.15, tibia 3: 1.05, tibia 4: 1.50; tibia 1 L/d: 9; diameters of leg femora 0.28–0.30, of leg tibiae 0.14–0.15.
COLOUR (in ethanol). Prosoma and legs ochre-orange, no dark marks on carapace, leg femora distally darkened; abdomen grey with dark bluish internal marks; ventrally with light brown plate in front of gonopore.
BODY ( Fig. 3F View Fig ). Ocular area barely raised. Carapace with distinct but shallow thoracic groove. Clypeus unmodified, very short (clypeus rim to ALE: 0.24). Sternum slightly wider than long (0.68/0.58), heart-shaped (i.e., narrow posteriorly), with pair of distinct anterior processes near coxae 1. Abdomen globular.
CHELICERAE ( Fig. 15A–B View Fig ). With pair of long frontal apophyses; stridulatory files fine but clearly visible in dissecting microscope; distances between cheliceral stridulatory ridges proximally 3.0 µm, distally 3.8 µm.
PALPS ( Fig. 14 View Fig ). Coxa unmodified; trochanter without process; femur proximally with retrolateral-ventral process and prolateral stridulatory pick, distally widened but simple, slightly curved towards dorsal; femur-patella joints slightly shifted toward prolateral side; tibia globular, with two trichobothria; procursus very simple ( Fig. 15C–E View Fig ), narrow distal part directed towards prolateral, with semi-transparent tip; genital bulb with distinctive dorsal process and sclerotized and membranous distal elements ( Fig. 15F–H View Fig ).
LEGS. Without spines and curved hairs; with vertical hairs in two narrow dorsal bands on all tibiae (length ~20 µm); length of dorsal trichobothrium on tibia 1: ~100 µm; retrolateral trichobothrium of tibia 1 at 57%; prolateral trichobothrium absent on tibia 1; tarsus 1 with ~7 pseudosegments, only distally 2–3 distinct.
Variation (male)
Tibia 1 in other male: 1.35.
Female
In general, similar to male ( Fig. 3G View Fig ) but sternum without pair of anterior humps, tibiae without higher than usual density of short vertical hairs, and chelicerae without stridulatory files. Tibia 1 in four females: 0.90, 0.90, 1.00, 1.05. Epigynum ( Figs 16 View Fig , 18C View Fig ) with simple anterior plate protruding posteriorly; posterior plate wide, median part separated anteriorly from lateral parts by pair of whitish areas. Internal genitalia ( Fig. 17 View Fig ) very simple, apparently without or with small and indistinct median receptacle, without or with very small pore plates.
Distribution
Known from type locality only, in Mexico, Guerrero ( Fig. 2 View Fig ).
Natural history
The spiders were found in dry leaf litter in a low hillside forest ( Fig. 34C View Fig ). They shared the microhabitat with at least three further species of Pholcidae (Modisiminae) : one representative of Modisimus Simon, 1893 , one Anopsicus Chamberlin & Ivie, 1938 , and one species of uncertain generic position.
ZFMK |
Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Ninetinae |
Genus |