Deinodryinus R. Perkins

Olmi, Massimo, Rasnitsyn, Alexander P. & Guglielmino, Adalgisa, 2010, Revision of rock fossils of Dryinidae and Embolemidae (Hymenoptera: Chrysidoidea), Zootaxa 2499, pp. 21-38 : 30

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.293341

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6199445

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F087B2-FF82-FF84-FF72-79785237F9EC

treatment provided by

Plazi (2016-04-09 20:39:51, last updated 2024-11-26 22:12:41)

scientific name

Deinodryinus R. Perkins
status

 

Deinodryinus R. Perkins

Deinodryinus R. Perkins, 1907: 45 .

Type species: Deinodryinus paradoxus R. Perkins, 1907 , desig. by Muesebeck & Walkley, 1951.

FEMALE: macropterous or micropterous; palpal ratio: 6/3; in macropterous females forewing usually with distal part of stigmal vein longer than proximal part, less frequently as long as, or shorter than proximal part; occipital carina complete; vertex of head frequently with two strong oblique keels connecting posterior ocelli to occipital carina; pronotum with distinct anterior collar and posterior disc; enlarged claw with inner proximal prominence not bearing bristles, with 1–2 bristles or peg-like hairs located further distally than proximal prominence; tibial spurs 1, 1, 2.

MALE: always macropterous (even if the female is micropterous); palpal ratio: 6/3; forewing usually with distal part of stigmal vein longer than proximal part, less frequently as long as, or shorter than proximal part; forewing usually with pterostigma four or more than four times as long as broad; antennal hairs usually much longer than breadth of segments, less frequently shorter than breadth of segments; vertex of head frequently with two strong oblique keels connecting the posterior ocelli to the occipital carina; parameres without dorsal process, usually with more or less large inner branch wrapping penis, less frequently with reduced inner branch; tibial spurs 1, 1, 2.

SPECIES: 146 extant species + two fossil species ( Deinodryinus areolatus ( N. Ponomarenko, 1975) , from Baltic amber, and Deinodryinus ? aptianus Olmi, Rasnitsyn & Guglielmino, n. sp.).

Muesebeck, C. F. W. & Walkley, L. M. (1951) Family Dryinidae. In: Muesebeck C. F. W., Krombein K. V. & Townes H. K. (Eds.), Hymenoptera of America North of Mexico. Synoptic catalogue. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Monograph, 2, Washington, pp. 1034 - 1043.

Perkins, R. C. L. (1907) Parasites of leaf-hoppers. Report of Work of the Experiment Station of the Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Division of Entomology, Bulletin No. 4, 5 - 59.

Ponomarenko, N. G. (1975) A new hymenopteran species from Baltic amber. Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal, (1), 126 - 128 (in Russian; English translation: Paleontological Journal, 9 (1): 124 - 126).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

SuperFamily

Chrysidoidea

Family

Dryinidae

SubFamily

Anteoninae