Deinodryinus R. Perkins
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.293341 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6199445 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F087B2-FF82-FF84-FF72-79785237F9EC |
treatment provided by |
Plazi (2016-04-09 20:39:51, last updated 2024-11-26 22:12:41) |
scientific name |
Deinodryinus R. Perkins |
status |
|
Deinodryinus R. Perkins, 1907: 45 .
Type species: Deinodryinus paradoxus R. Perkins, 1907 , desig. by Muesebeck & Walkley, 1951.
FEMALE: macropterous or micropterous; palpal ratio: 6/3; in macropterous females forewing usually with distal part of stigmal vein longer than proximal part, less frequently as long as, or shorter than proximal part; occipital carina complete; vertex of head frequently with two strong oblique keels connecting posterior ocelli to occipital carina; pronotum with distinct anterior collar and posterior disc; enlarged claw with inner proximal prominence not bearing bristles, with 1–2 bristles or peg-like hairs located further distally than proximal prominence; tibial spurs 1, 1, 2.
MALE: always macropterous (even if the female is micropterous); palpal ratio: 6/3; forewing usually with distal part of stigmal vein longer than proximal part, less frequently as long as, or shorter than proximal part; forewing usually with pterostigma four or more than four times as long as broad; antennal hairs usually much longer than breadth of segments, less frequently shorter than breadth of segments; vertex of head frequently with two strong oblique keels connecting the posterior ocelli to the occipital carina; parameres without dorsal process, usually with more or less large inner branch wrapping penis, less frequently with reduced inner branch; tibial spurs 1, 1, 2.
SPECIES: 146 extant species + two fossil species ( Deinodryinus areolatus ( N. Ponomarenko, 1975) , from Baltic amber, and Deinodryinus ? aptianus Olmi, Rasnitsyn & Guglielmino, n. sp.).
Muesebeck, C. F. W. & Walkley, L. M. (1951) Family Dryinidae. In: Muesebeck C. F. W., Krombein K. V. & Townes H. K. (Eds.), Hymenoptera of America North of Mexico. Synoptic catalogue. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Monograph, 2, Washington, pp. 1034 - 1043.
Perkins, R. C. L. (1907) Parasites of leaf-hoppers. Report of Work of the Experiment Station of the Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Division of Entomology, Bulletin No. 4, 5 - 59.
Ponomarenko, N. G. (1975) A new hymenopteran species from Baltic amber. Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal, (1), 126 - 128 (in Russian; English translation: Paleontological Journal, 9 (1): 124 - 126).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SuperFamily |
Chrysidoidea |
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Anteoninae |
Deinodryinus R. Perkins
Olmi, Massimo, Rasnitsyn, Alexander P. & Guglielmino, Adalgisa 2010 |
Deinodryinus
Perkins 1907: 45 |
1 (by plazi, 2016-04-09 20:39:51)
2 (by ImsDioSync, 2017-02-19 13:32:34)
3 (by ImsDioSync, 2017-02-20 19:26:57)
4 (by ExternalLinkService, 2019-09-26 21:12:23)
5 (by ExternalLinkService, 2022-01-30 16:04:15)
6 (by ExternalLinkService, 2022-02-21 09:12:25)
7 (by plazi, 2023-10-25 13:06:31)