Hydraena rosannae Audisio, Trizzino & De Biase 2009
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3607.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:97967754-52CD-4334-8714-F41C7A63B068 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EFC245-8152-FFF9-FF1D-FF59A2FCF860 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Hydraena rosannae Audisio, Trizzino & De Biase 2009 |
status |
|
58. Hydraena rosannae Audisio, Trizzino & De Biase 2009 View in CoL
Hydraena rosannae Audisio, Trizzino & De Biase 2009: 283 View in CoL View Cited Treatment .
Male habitus: Fig. 34b View FIGURES 34 ; male genitalia: Fig. 34d View FIGURES 34 ; female elytral apex: Fig. 34g View FIGURES 34 ; geographic range: Fig. 35 View FIGURE 35 .
Type locality: Italy, Sardinia, Medio Campidano province, above Villacidro, Cannisoni River , 390 m a.s.l., 39° 24' 37.28'' N, 8° 38' 27.39 E ( Audisio et al. 2009) GoogleMaps .
Primary types: Holotype at MZUR.
Measurements: Length: 1.9 – 2.2 mm. EL/EW = 1.76; PW/PL = 1.40; PW/EW = 0.82.
Diagnosis: Body orange to reddish brown. Palps and legs pale reddish brown. Labrum with V-shaped notch on anterior margin. Fronto-clypeal suture almost straight. Middle of frons moderately densely punctate, lateral regions of frons densely and rugosely punctate, punctures and interstices microreticulate.
Pronotum nearly hexagonal, with lateral margin denticulate. Anterior angle slightly obtuse, lateral margin moderately produced at middle, strongly convergent at anterior angle, sinuately convergent at posterior angle. Pronotal disc convex, rather densely punctate near anterior and posterior margin, along midline and at posterior foveae.
Elytra elongate, convex, slightly and regularly arcuate at sides, apically produced and only very weakly declivitous; moderately declivitous laterally. Explanate margin relatively narrow and long, not reaching apex. Elytral apex slightly acuminate in male, moderately sinuate in female ( Figs. 34b,g View FIGURES 34 ). Male protibiae slightly but distinctly dilated and slightly curved along their inner edge; male metatibiae with a fringe of notably long setae along mesal face of distal half.
Taxonomic position and diagnostic characters: Distinct from its closest allies H. evanescens and H. tyrrhena by the distinct male protibiae ( Fig. 34b View FIGURES 34 ), and the differently shaped aedeagus, characterized (in lateral view) by dorsal outline of main piece with a very wide and shallow arcuate emargination at distal third ( Fig. 34d View FIGURES 34 ). Molecular data shows a sister-group relationship between H. rosannae and H. tyrrhena ( Trizzino et al. 2011b) .
Habitat: The type specimens were collected under stones in a stream with relatively fast-running water, on granodioritic substrate, at nearly 400 m a.s.l. HER: eu32 .
Chorotype: SARD (Sardinian Endemic).
Distribution: EUR: IT - SAR ( Fig. 35 View FIGURE 35 ).
H. rosannae is known solely from the type locality, in Sulcis-Iglesiente ( SW Sardinia) .
DNA data: For this species, mtDNA data (COI, 16S rDNA, tRNA leu and NAD1) are available in GenBank ( Trizzino et al. 2011b).
59. Hydraena evanescens Rey 1884
Hydraena evanescens Rey 1884: 270 View in CoL .
Male genitalia: Fig. 34e View FIGURES 34 ; female elytral apex: Fig. 34h View FIGURES 34 ; geographic range: Fig. 35 View FIGURE 35 .
Type locality: Corsica (“ Corsica ”: Rey 1884) .
Primary types: Holotype / Lectotype not yet formally designated. Type series in MNHL .
Measurements: Length: 1.9 – 2.1 mm. EL/EW = 1.87; PW/PL = 1.40; PW/EW = 0.82.
Diagnosis: Male habitus identical to H. tyrrhena ( Fig. 34a View FIGURES 34 ).
Taxonomic position and diagnostic characters: See differential diagnosis of H. tyrrhena .
Habitat: This species usually lives under stones in fastflowing streams with granodioritic substrates, above 400 m a.s.l. HER: eu10.
Chorotype: CORS (Corsican Endemic).
Distribution: EUR: FR - COR ( Fig. 35 View FIGURE 35 ).
H. evanescens is endemic to Corsica (see Appendix 2 for all the detailed known localities).
DNA data: For this species, mtDNA (COI, 16S rDNA, tRNA leu and NAD1) and nuclear DNA (18S rDNA, 28S rDNA) data are available in GenBank ( Trizzino et al. 2011b; Ribera et al. 2011).
60. Hydraena decolor Sainte-Claire Deville 1903
Hydraena decolor Sainte - Claire Deville 1903: 111.
Habitus: Fig. 36a View FIGURES 36 ; male genitalia: Fig. 36c View FIGURES 36 ; female elytral apex: Fig. 36g View FIGURES 36 ; geographic range: Fig. 37 View FIGURE 37 .
Type locality: France, Alpes Maritimes , Nice , Lantosque, La Bollène River (”Lantosque”: Sainte - Claire Deville 1903) .
Primary types: Holotype / Lectotype not yet formally designated. Type series in MNHN .
Measurements: Length: 2.1 – 2.3 mm. EL/EW = 1.75; PW/PL = 1.33; PW/EW = 0.80.
Diagnosis: Body red to reddish brown. Palps and legs pale reddish brown. Labrum with V-shaped notch on anterior margin. Fronto - clypeal suture slightly arcuate, not strongly impressed, frons densely punctate in middle and lateral regions. Pronotum sub - hexagonal, with lateral margin denticulate. Pronotal disc relatively convex, rather densely punctate near anterior and posterior margin, along midline and at posterior foveae. Elytra elongate, parallel - sided, not convex. Elytral apex distinctly obtusely truncate in male, slightly sinuate in female. Male metatibiae not dilated distad, but armed with a fringe of relatively long setae along mesal face of distal half ( Figs. 36a,g View FIGURES 36 ).
Taxonomic position and diagnostic characters: Easily diagnosed from its allies H. solarii , H. occitana and H. bononiensis by the straight male metatibiae, the obtusely truncate male elytral apex, and the distinctly larger and differently shaped aedeagus ( Figs. 36a,c View FIGURES 36 ). Molecular data shows a sister-group relationship between the H. decolor and H. evanescens complexes ( Trizzino et al. 2011b).
Habitat: This species usually lives under stones in relatively wide and deep fastflowing streams with carbonatic substrates, between 50 and 1500 m a.s.l. HER: eu3; eu17; eu21.
Chorotype: ALSW (SW Alpine Endemic).
Distribution: EUR: FR - FRA, IT - ITA ( Fig. 37 View FIGURE 37 ).
H. decolor has a geographic range restricted to French and Italian Maritimes Alps, Ligurian Alps, and W portion of Ligurian Apennine (see Appendix 2 for all the detailed known localities).
DNA data: For this species, mtDNA data (COI, 16S rDNA, tRNA leu and NAD1) are available in GenBank ( Trizzino et al. 2011b).
61. Hydraena solarii Pretner 1930
Hydraena (Haenydra) solarii Pretner 1930: 178 View in CoL .
Male habitus: Fig. 36b View FIGURES 36 ; Male genitalia: Fig. 36f View FIGURES 36 ; female elytral apex: Fig. 36m View FIGURES 36 ; geographic range: Fig. 37 View FIGURE 37 .
Type locality: Italy, Tuscany, Grosseto province, Amiata Mount, Arcidosso (“ Arcidosso , Toscana ”: Pretner 1930) .
Primary types: Holotype / Lectotype not yet formally designated. Type series in PMSL .
Measurements: Length: 2. 0 – 2.3 mm. EL/EW = 1.68; PW/PL = 1.36; PW/EW = 0.79.
Diagnosis: Body red to reddish brown. Palps and legs pale reddish brown. Labrum with V-shaped notch on anterior margin. Fronto - clypeal suture slightly arcuate, not strongly impressed, frons very densely punctate in middle and lateral regions. Pronotum sub - hexagonal, with lateral margin denticulate. Pronotal disc relatively convex, rather densely punctate near anterior and posterior margin, along midline and at posterior foveae. Elytra elongate, parallel - sided, slightly convex. Elytral apex slightly obtusely truncate in male, moderately sinuate in female ( Figs. 36b,m View FIGURES 36 ). Male metatibiae with a prominent dilatation in the inner edge of distal third, and with fringe of relatively long setae along mesal face of distal half ( Fig. 36b View FIGURES 36 ).
Taxonomic position and diagnostic characters: Easily diagnosed from H. decolor by the distinctly dilated (distad) male metatibiae ( Fig. 36b View FIGURES 36 ), and from its closest allies H. occitana and H. bononiensis by the differently shaped main piece of the aedeagus, characterized (in lateral view) by an U-shaped emargination in proximal third of ventral margin producing an almost right angle, and by an apex distinctly thinner than in related species ( Fig. 36f View FIGURES 36 ).
Habitat: This species usually lives under stones in relatively small fastflowing streams, chiefly in small canyons with carbonatic substrates, mostly from 400 to 1000 m a.s.l. HER: eu20; eu22; eu84.
Chorotype: APPE (Apenninic Endemic).
Distribution: EUR: IT - ITA ( Fig. 37 View FIGURE 37 ).
H. solarii has a geographic range restricted to Central and southern Apennine (see Appendix 2 for all the detailed known localities).
DNA data: For this species, mtDNA data (COI, 16S rDNA, tRNA leu and NAD1) are available in GenBank ( Trizzino et al. 2011b).
62. Hydraena occitana (Audisio & De Biase 1995)
Hydraena (Haenydra) solarii View in CoL auct. (partim), nec Pretner 1930: 178; d’Orchymont 1935: 4–5; Binaghi 1958: 73–77; Binaghi 1960: 31;
Haenydra occitana Audisio & De Biase 1995: 176 .
Male genitalia: Fig. 36d View FIGURES 36 ; female elytral apex: Fig. 36h View FIGURES 36 ; geographic range: Fig. 37 View FIGURE 37 .
Type locality: Italy, Liguria, Imperia province, Pornassio, Arroscia river , 600 m a.s.l. (“Italia, Liguria, Pornassio [ IM], alto corso del torrente Arroscia, m 600”: Audisio & De Biase 1995) .
Primary types: Holotype at MZUR.
Measurements: Length: 2. 0 – 2.15 mm. EL/EW = 1.68; PW/PL = 1.36; PW/EW = 0.79.
Diagnosis: Male habitus indentical to H. solarii ( Fig. 36b View FIGURES 36 ).
Taxonomic position and diagnostic characters: See differential diagnosis of H. solarii .
Habitat: This species usually lives under stones in relatively small fastflowing streams, mostly with carbonatic substrates, from 60 to 1100 m a.s.l. HER: eu3; eu18; eu21.
Chorotype: AWNA (W Alpine/N Apenninic Endemic).
Distribution: EUR: FR - FRA, IT - ITA ( Fig. 37 View FIGURE 37 ).
H. occitana has a geographic range restricted to E Provence, Maritime and Ligurian Alps, Ligurian Apennine and NW Tuscany (Apuane Alps) (see Appendix 2 for all the detailed known localities).
DNA data: For this species, mtDNA data (COI, 16S rDNA, tRNA leu and NAD1) are available in GenBank ( Trizzino et al. 2011b).
63. Hydraena bononiensis Chiesa 1959
Hydraena (Haenydra) solarii var. bononiensis Chiesa 1959: 61 View in CoL ;
Hydraena (Haenydra) bononiensis View in CoL ; Binaghi 1960: 29.
Male genitalia: Fig. 36e View FIGURES 36 ; female elytral apex: Fig. 36l View FIGURES 36 ; geographic range: Fig. 37 View FIGURE 37 .
Type locality: Italy, Emilia Romagna, Bologna province, Porretta, Rio [River] Maggiore (“ Porretta , Rio Maggiore ”: Chiesa 1959) .
Primary types: Holotype / Lectotype not yet formally designated. Type series in MSNM.
Measurements: Length: 2. 0 – 2.2 mm. EL/EW = 1.68; PW/PL = 1.36; PW/EW = 0.79.
Diagnosis: Male habitus identical to H. solarii ( Fig. 36b View FIGURES 36 ), with slightly more elongate elytra.
Taxonomic position and diagnostic characters: See differential diagnosis of H. solarii .
Habitat: This species usually lives under stones in relatively small fastflowing streams with both carbonatic and siliceous substrates, from 350 to 1000 m a.s.l. HER: eu18; eu84.
Chorotype: APPN (N Apenninic Endemic).
Distribution: EUR: IT - ITA ( Fig. 37 View FIGURE 37 ).
H. bononiensis has a geographic range restricted to Tosco - Emiliano Apennine (see Appendix 2 for all the detailed known localities).
DNA data: For this species, mtDNA data (COI, 16S rDNA, tRNA leu and NAD1) are available in GenBank ( Trizzino et al. 2011b).
64. Hydraena truncata Rey 1885
Hydraena (Haenydra) truncata Rey 1885: 31 View in CoL ;
Hydraena (Haenydra) truncata ssp. falzonii Pretner 1930: 181 View in CoL .
Male habitus: Fig. 38a View FIGURES 38 ; male genitalia: Fig. 38d View FIGURES 38 ; female elytral apex: Fig. 38g View FIGURES 38 ; geographic range: Fig. 39 View FIGURE 39 .
Type locality: France, Rhône-Alpes, Grande Chartreuse, Isére (“Isére”: Rey 1885) .
Primary types: Holotype / Lectotype not yet formally designated. Type series in MHNL .
Measurements: Length: 2. 0 – 2.3 mm. EL/EW = 1.90; PW/PL = 1.33; PW/EW = 0.84.
Diagnosis: Head, pronotum and scutellum dark brown to black, elytra red to reddish brown. Palps and legs pale reddish brown. Labrum with V-shaped notch on anterior margin. Middle of frons moderately densely punctate, lateral regions of frons densely and rugosely punctate.
Pronotum sub-hexagonal, with anterior margin relatively concave and lateral margin denticulate. Pronotal disc convex, rather densely punctate near anterior and posterior margin, along midline and at posterior foveae. Elytra elongate, convex, parallel-sided, apically distinctly truncate in male, very slighlty sinuate in female. Explanate elytral margin notably narrow, almost absent ( Figs. 38a,g View FIGURES 38 ). Male metatibiae not dilated or very slightly dilated distad, and with a fringe of very long setae along mesal face of distal half.
Taxonomic position and diagnostic characters: Easily diagnosed from other " Haenydra " by the peculiarly truncate male elytra ( Fig. 38a View FIGURES 38 ), and the peculiar shape of male genitalia, characterized (in lateral view) by bifurcate apex of the main piece and by a short and thick flagellum ( Fig. 38d View FIGURES 38 ).
Taxonomic remarks: Referring to Calabrian and NE Sicilian populations of H. truncata , the latter occasionally characterized by darker melanic habitus of elytra and male genitalia, Pretner (1930) described a subspecies named H. truncata falzonii . On the basis of the shape of male genitalia, identical to those of H. truncata , H. truncata falzonii was later considered a junior synonym of H. truncata s. str. (Audisio & De Biase 1995). Furthermore, Calabrian and NE Sicilian populations are molecularly not differentiated from other Italian populations (Trizzino unpublished data); a certain degree of genetic divergence was otherwise observed in N Iberian populations ( Ribera et al. 2011, Trizzino et al. 2011).
DNA data suggested close relationships between H. truncata and the sister species H. muelleri + H. czernohorskyi ( Trizzino et al. 2011b) .
Habitat: This species usually lives under stones in fastflowing streams of varying substrate typologies, above 50 m a.s.l. HER: Heterotopic species.
Chorotype: SEU (southern-European).
Distribution: EUR: AU, CR, CZ, FR, GE, IT-ITA, IT-SI;PL, RO, SK, SL, SP, SZ, UK ( Fig. 39 View FIGURE 39 ).
H. truncata is widespread in S Europe, from Portugal to Ukraine (see Appendix 2 for all the detailed known localities).
DNA data: For this species, mtDNA (COI, 16S rDNA, tRNA leu and NAD1) and nuclear DNA (18S rDNA, 28S rDNA) data are available in GenBank ( Trizzino et al. 2011b; Ribera et al. 2011).
65. Hydraena czernohorskyi J. Müller 1911
Hydraena (Haenydra) czernohorskyi J. Müller 1911: 60 View in CoL .
Male habitus: Fig. 38b View FIGURES 38 ; male genitalia: Fig. 38e View FIGURES 38 ; female elytral apex: Fig. 38h View FIGURES 38 ; geographic range: Fig. 39 View FIGURE 39 . Type locality: Slovenia, N Istria, Klas province , Klanec (“Klanec [Nordistrien]”: Müller 1911) .
Primary types: Holotype / Lectotype not yet formally designated. Type series in Trieste Nat. Hist. Museum.
Measurements: Length: 2.3 – 2.5 mm. EL/EW = 1.58; PW/PL = 1.42; PW/EW = 0.71.
Diagnosis: Body dark brown to black. Palps and legs pale reddish brown. Labrum with a deep V-shaped notch on anterior margin. Clypeus shiny, frons densely and rugosely punctate.
Pronotum sub-hexagonal, relatively wide, with anterior margin relatively concave and lateral margin denticulate. Pronotal disc convex, rather densely punctate near anterior and posterior margin, along midline and at posterior foveae. Elytra distinctly elongate in male, markedly wide, flattened and almost completely parallel-sided in both sexes. Explanate elytral margin wide and long, reaching the apex. Elytral apex conjointly rounded in male, subtruncate in female ( Figs. 38b,h View FIGURES 38 ). Male metatibiae very slightly dilated in the inner edge of distal third, and with fringe of relatively long setae along mesal face of distal half.
Taxonomic position and diagnostic characters: Easily diagnosed from most other " Haenydra " by the peculiarly elongate and flattened male elytra ( Fig. 38b View FIGURES 38 ), and the markedly wide (almost square-shaped) female elytra ( Fig. 38h View FIGURES 38 ). Male genitalia, characterized by an obliquely truncate apex and by a relatively short and thick flagellum ( Fig. 38h View FIGURES 38 ), suggest somewhat relationships among this species and the pair H. truncata + H.muelleri , bringing together a complex of species distinctly differentiated from each other on the basis of external morphology, but clearly related on the basis of male genitalia, and also confirmed by molecular data ( Trizzino et al. 2011b).
Habitat: This species usually lives under stones, mostly in small streams with carbonatic substrates, between 10 and 500 m a.s.l. HER: eu11; eu45.
Chorotype: CADI (Carso - Istrian / Dinaric Endemic).
Distribution: EUR: CR, IT-ITA, SL ( Fig. 39 View FIGURE 39 ).
H. czernohorskyi is known from NE Italy (surroundings of Trieste), Slovenia and N Croatia (see Appendix 2 for all the detailed known localities).
DNA data: For this species, mtDNA data (COI, 16S rDNA, tRNA leu and NAD1) are available in GenBank ( Trizzino et al. 2011b).
66. Hydraena muelleri Pretner 1931
Hydraena (Haenydra) muelleri Pretner 1931c: 107 View in CoL ;
Hydraena (Haenydra) jaroslavae (Pretner i.l.) Chiesa 1959 (nomen nudum): 62; Jäch 2004: 107.
Male habitus: Fig. 38c View FIGURES 38 ; male genitalia: Fig. 38f View FIGURES 38 ; female elytral apex: Fig. 38l View FIGURES 38 ; geographic range: Fig. 39 View FIGURE 39 .
Type locality: Slovenia, Primorska region , Skrilje (“Skrilje”: Pretner 1931c) .
Primary types: Holotype / Lectotype not yet formally designated. Type series in PMSL .
Measurements: Length: 2. 0 – 2.3 mm. EL/EW = 1.60; PW/PL = 1.42; PW/EW = 0.77.
Diagnosis: Body dark brown to black. Palps and legs pale reddish brown. Labrum with a V-shaped notch on anterior margin. Clypeus shiny, frons densely and very rugosely punctate.
Pronotum sub-hexagonal, with external angle almost right, and lateral margin denticulate. Pronotal disc convex, rather densely punctate near anterior and posterior margin, along midline and at posterior foveae. Elytra elongate, relatively wide, flattened and completely parallel-sided in both sexes. Explanate elytral margin relatively wide and long, reaching apex. Elytral apex conjointly rounded in male, distinctly bifurcate in female. Male metatibiae not dilated, but armed with a fringe of long setae along mesal face of distal half ( Figs. 38c,l View FIGURES 38 ).
Taxonomic position and diagnostic characters: Distinct from other " Haenydra " by peculiar female elytral apex (resembling H. plumipes and H. bicuspidata ) ( Fig. 38l View FIGURES 38 ), and the shape of male genitalia, characterized (in lateral view) by an obliquely truncate apex and by a notably short and thick flagellum ( Fig. 38f View FIGURES 38 ), suggesting relationships with both H. czernohorskyi and H. truncata , as otherwise confirmed by molecular data ( Trizzino et al. 2011b).
Habitat: This species usually lives under stones in small fastflowing streams, on both siliceous and carbonatic substrates, chiefly in Fagus forests, between 100 and 500 m a.s.l. HER: eu11; eu45.
Chorotype: ALSE (SE Alpine / Carso - Istrian Endemic).
Distribution: EUR: IT-ITA, SL ( Fig. 39 View FIGURE 39 ).
H. muelleri is endemic to NE Italy (Friuli V.G.) and Slovenia (see Appendix 2 for all the detailed known localities).
DNA data: For this species, mtDNA data (COI, 16S rDNA, tRNA leu and NAD1) are available in GenBank ( Trizzino et al. 2011b).
67. Hydraena devillei Ganglbauer 1901
Hydraena (Haenydra) devillei Ganglbauer 1901: 324 View in CoL .
Male habitus: Fig. 40a View FIGURES 40 ; male genitalia: Fig. 40c View FIGURES 40 ; female elytral apex: Fig. 40g View FIGURES 40 ; geographic range: Fig. 41 View FIGURE 41 .
Type locality: Italy, Liguria, Genova province, Mount Fasce, Sturla river, 500 m a.s.l. (“Canal de la Vésubie in den Alpes maritimes [und] Monte Fasce bei Genua”: Ganglbauer 1901; “Monte Fasce torr. Sturla”: Jäch 1990)
Primary types: Lectotype ( NMW) designated by Jäch (1990).
Measurements: Length: 2.5 – 3.0 mm. EL/EW = 1.67; PW/PL = 1.54; PW/EW = 0.83.
Diagnosis: Body dark brown to black. Palps and legs pale reddish brown. Labrum with a V-shaped notch on anterior margin. Clypeus finely punctate, frons densely and very rugosely punctate.
Pronotum hexagonal, distinctly wide and convex, with external angle acuminate. Pronotal disc markedly convex, rather densely punctate near anterior and posterior margin, along midline and at posterior foveae. Elytra elongate, parallel-sided, slightly convex in male, more convex in female. Explanate elytral margin moderately wide and relatively long, not reaching apex. Elytral apex obtusely truncate in male, convergent and slightly sinuate in female ( Figs. 40a,g View FIGURES 40 ).
Male profemura with a fringe of short setae on the ventral surface, male protibiae very slightly dilated in the inner edge of mesal third, male mesotibiae notably arcuate and with a markedly prominent dilatation in the inner edge of mesal third; male metatibiae slightly dilated in the inner edge of mesal third, and with fringe of very long setae along mesal face of distal half ( Fig. 40a View FIGURES 40 ).
Taxonomic position and diagnostic characters: Easily diagnosed from other " Haenydra " by the large body size, the wide and convex pronotum (chiefly in males) and the peculiar shape of male legs ( Fig. 40a View FIGURES 40 ). Distinct from its sibling H. devincta by male genitalia, characterized (in lateral view) by a relatively simple and straight main piece ( Fig. 40c View FIGURES 40 ).
Habitat: This species usually lives under stones in fastflowing streams, mostly with siliceous substrates, between 20 and 1000 m a.s.l. HER: Heterotopic species. Chorotype: ALWA (W Alpine/Apenninic Endemic). Distribution: EUR: IT-ITA ( Fig. 41 View FIGURE 41 ). H. devillei is endemic to peninsular Italy, except for NW, where its geographic range reachs the Roya Valley, in SE France (see Appendix 2 for all the detailed known localities). DNA data: For this species, mtDNA data (COI, 16S rDNA, tRNA leu and NAD1) are available in GenBank ( Trizzino et al. 2011b; Ribera et al. 2011).
68. Hydraena devincta d’Orchymont 1940
Hydraena (Haenydra) devincta d’Orchymont 1940: 131 View in CoL .
Male genitalia: Fig. 40d View FIGURES 40 ; female elytral apex: Fig. 40h View FIGURES 40 ; geographic range: Fig. 41 View FIGURE 41 .
Type locality: Italy, Friuli Venezia Giulia, Trieste province , Muggia, Strolci (“ Istrie. Strolci, dans la Risano ”: d’Orchymont 1940) .
Primary types: Holotype at ISNB.
Measurements: Length: 2.5 – 2.8 mm. EL/EW = 1.67; PW/PL = 1.54; PW/EW = 0.83.
Diagnosis: Male habitus identical to H. devillei ( Fig. 40a View FIGURES 40 ). Easily diagnosed from other " Haenydra " by the large body size, by the wide and convex pronotum and by the peculiar male legs ( Fig. 40a View FIGURES 40 ).
Taxonomic position and diagnostic characters: See differential diagnosis of H. devillei .
Habitat: This species usually lives under stones in fastflowing streams with siliceous substrates, between 20 and 500 m a.s.l. HER: eu11; eu45.
Chorotype: ALSE (SE Alpine / Carso - Istrian Endemic).
Distribution: EUR: IT-ITA, SL ( Fig. 41 View FIGURE 41 ).
H. devincta is endemic to NE Italy (Friuli V.G.) and Slovenia (see Appendix 2 for all the detailed known localities). DNA data: For this species, mtDNA data (COI, 16S rDNA, tRNA leu and NAD1) are available in GenBank ( Ribera et al. 2011; Trizzino et al. 2011b).
69. Hydraena lapidicola Kiesenwetter 1849
Hydraena lapidicola Kiesenwetter 1849: 183 View in CoL .
Male habitus: Fig. 40b View FIGURES 40 ; male genitalia: Fig. 40e View FIGURES 40 ; female elytral apex: Fig. 40l View FIGURES 40 ; geographic range: Fig. 41 View FIGURE 41 .
Type locality: Austria, Carinthian Alps , in a small mountain stream (“Kärnthner Alpen in einem kleinen Gebirgsbache”: Kiesenwetter 1849) .
Primary types: Holotype / Lectotype not yet formally designated. Type series in ZSM .
Measurements: Length: 2.2 – 2.4 mm. EL/EW = 1.73; PW/PL = 1.42; PW/EW = 0.77.
Diagnosis: Head and pronotum dark brown to black, elytra usually red to reddish brown, only sometimes completely dark brown or black. Palps and legs pale reddish brown. Labrum with a V-shaped notch on anterior margin. Clypeus finely punctate, frons densely punctate in middle portion, rugosely punctate nearby the eyes. Segments II and III of male maxillary palps markedly dilated (segment III also shorter than in related species-Fig. 40b).
Pronotum sub-hexagonal, convex and relatively wide, slightly sinuate posteriorly. Pronotal disc convex, rather densely punctate near anterior and posterior margin, along midline and at posterior foveae. Elytra relatively elongate, notably convex, parallel-sided in the proximal half, apically convergent. Explanate elytral margin moderately wide and relatively long, almost reaching apex. Elytral apex distinctly acuminate in male, slightly sinuate in female ( Figs. 40b,l View FIGURES 40 ).
Male metatibiae not dilated, with bushy fringe of very long setae along mesal face of distal half.
Taxonomic position and diagnostic characters: Easily diagnosed from other " Haenydra " by the peculiarly dilated male maxillary palps ( Fig. 40b View FIGURES 40 ). Distinct from its sibling H. sanfilippoi by male genitalia, characterized (in lateral view) by a notably more dilated apical half of main piece, with a very short and relatively thick flagellum located on the left side ( Fig. 40e View FIGURES 40 ).
Habitat: This species usually lives under stones in fastflowing streams, mainly with siliceous substrates, between 400 and 1600 m a.s.l. HER: Heterotopic species.
Chorotype: CEU (Central - European).
Distribution: EUR: AU, CR, CZ, FR, GE, IT-ITA, LS, SL, SZ ( Fig. 41 View FIGURE 41 ).
H. lapidicola has a relatively widespread Central-European distribution, ranging from E France to Czech Republic (see Appendix 2 for all the detailed known localities).
DNA data: For this species, mtDNA data (COI, 16S rDNA, tRNA leu and NAD1) are available in GenBank ( Trizzino et al. 2011b; Ribera et al. 2011).
70. Hydraena sanfilippoi (Audisio & De Biase 1995)
Hydraena lapidicola View in CoL auct., nec Kiesenwetter 1849: 183; Chiesa 1958: 99; Chiesa 1959: 55–56;
Haenydra sanfilippoi Audisio & De Biase 1995: 172 .
Male genitalia: Fig. 40f View FIGURES 40 ; female elytral apex: Fig. 40m View FIGURES 40 ; geographic range: Fig. 41 View FIGURE 41 .
Type locality: Italy, Liguria, Genova province, Fiorino , 250 m a.s.l. (“ Liguria, Fiorino [ GE], m 250”: Audisio & De Biase 1995) .
Primary types: Holotype at MSNG.
Measurements: Length: 2.3 – 2.6 mm. EL/EW = 1.73; PW/PL = 1.42; PW/EW = 0.77.
Diagnosis: Male habitus identical to H. lapidicola ( Fig. 40b View FIGURES 40 ).
Taxonomic position and diagnostic characters: See differential diagnosis of H. lapidicola .
Habitat: This species usually lives under stones in fastflowing streams with both siliceous and carbonatic substrates, between 250 and 1000 m a.s.l. HER: eu18.
Chorotype: APPN (N Apenninic Endemic).
Distribution: EUR: IT-ITA ( Fig. 41 View FIGURE 41 ).
H. sanfilippoi was collected in a few sites in Central and eastern Liguria and in W Tuscany (see Appendix 2 for all the detailed known localities). A single female of H. sp. cfr. sanfilippoi was collected in S Apennine ( Italy, Calabria, Cosenza province, Longobucco; vii.1979, F. Angelini leg., CFT). Despite several attempts in the most recent years, by different entomologists, to collect additional specimens in such locality, the actual presence of this species (or of a closely related and undescribed taxon) in S Italy still needs to be be confirmed .
DNA data: For this species, mtDNA data (COI, 16S rDNA, tRNA leu and NAD1) are available in GenBank ( Trizzino et al. 2011b).
71. Hydraena bosnica Apfelbeck 1909
Hydraena (Haenydra) bosnica Apfelbeck 1909: 497 View in CoL .
Male habitus: Fig. 42a View FIGURES 42 ; male genitalia: Fig. 42b View FIGURES 42 ; female elytral apex: Fig. 42e View FIGURES 42 ; geographic range: Fig. 43 View FIGURE 43 .
Type locality: Bosnia, Sarajevo province , Jablanica (“Jablanica”: Apfelbeck 1909) .
Primary types: Holotype / Lectotype not yet formally designated. Type series probably destroyed.
Measurements: Length: 2.3 – 2.4 mm. EL/EW = 1.68; PW/PL = 1.42; PW/EW = 0.77.
Diagnosis: Body dark brown or black. Palps and legs pale reddish brown. Labrum with a deep V-shaped notch on anterior margin. Clypeus and frons densely punctate.
Pronotum sub-hexagonal, convex, distinctly wide, posteriorly sinuate and with posterior angle right. Pronotal disc convex, rather densely punctate near anterior and posterior margin, along midline and at posterior foveae. Elytra elongate, markedly convex, not parallel-sided, oval-shaped. Explanate elytral margin wide and relatively long, reaching apex. Elytral apex conjointly rounded in male, with a V-shaped sutural notch in female ( Figs. 42a,e View FIGURES 42 ).
Male mesotibiae slightly dilated in the inner edge of distal third, male metatibiae markedly dilated in the inner edge of mesal third, and with a distinctly bushy fringe of very long setae along mesal face of distal half.
Taxonomic position and diagnostic characters: Easily diagnosed from other " Haenydra " by the peculiar metatibiae, the sinuate pronotum, and the oval-shaped male elytra ( Fig. 42a View FIGURES 42 ). Distinct from its allopatric sibling H. hungarica and H. leonhardi by female elytral apex ( Fig. 42e View FIGURES 42 ) and the male genitalia, characterized (in lateral view) by a hook-shaped apex of the main piece ( Fig. 42b View FIGURES 42 ). A revision of this complex is in press ( Stanković and Jäch 2012), with the description of a new species from Macedonia on the basis of a single male and a single female. However, combining the individual variability and structural complexity characterising male genitalia of species belonging to this clade, we believe that further molecular studies and the morphological examination of more specimens from the Balkans and Pannonian areas, would be fundamental in order to make final conclusions about the complex.
Habitat: This species usually lives under stones in small fastflowing streams, mainly with siliceous substrates, above 500 m a.s.l. HER: eu14; eu45. Chorotype: BALK (Balkanian Endemic). Distribution: EUR: BH, YU ( Fig. 43 View FIGURE 43 ). H. bosnica is endemic to Bosnia, Serbia and Montenegro (see Appendix 2 for all the detailed known localities). DNA data: No data.
72. Hydraena hungarica Rey 1884
Hydraena (Haenydra) hungarica Rey 1884: 270 View in CoL ;
Hydraena (Haenydra) csikii Endrödy-Younga 1967: 24 ; Lohse 1971: 101 (czikii); Audisio et al. 1996: 79.
Male genitalia: Fig. 42c View FIGURES 42 ; female elytral apex: Fig. 42f View FIGURES 42 ; geographic range: Fig. 43 View FIGURE 43 .
Type locality: Hungary (“Hongrie”: Rey 1884); very likely in W Carpathian Mts .
Primary types: Holotype / Lectotype not yet formally designated. Type series in MHNL .
Measurements: Length: 2.3 – 2.4 mm. EL/EW = 1.68; PW/PL = 1.42; PW/EW = 0.77.
Diagnosis: Male habitus identical to H. bosnica ( Fig. 42a View FIGURES 42 ).
Taxonomic position and diagnostic characters: See differential diagnosis of H. bosnica .
Habitat: As its siblings, this species usually lives under stones in small fastflowing streams, mainly with siliceous substrates, above 500 m a.s.l. HER: Heterotopic species.
Chorotype: PANN (Pannonian Endemic).
Distribution: EUR: HU, PL, RO, SK, UK, YU ( Fig. 43 View FIGURE 43 ).
H. hungarica is distributed in Central E Europe, ranging from Hungary to Ukraine (see Appendix 2 for all the detailed known localities).
DNA data: No data.
73. Hydraena leonhardi Breit 1916
Hydraena (Haenydra) leonhardi Breit 1916: 56 View in CoL .
Male genitalia: Fig. 42d View FIGURES 42 ; female elytral apex: Fig. 42g View FIGURES 42 ; geographic range: Fig. 43 View FIGURE 43 .
Type locality: Bulgaria, Kröstilca Mts , Magliz (“Maglice”: Breit 1916) .
Primary types: Holotype / Lectotype not yet formally designated. Type series in ZMHB .
Measurements: Length: 2.3 – 2.4 mm. EL/EW = 1.68; PW/PL = 1.42; PW/EW = 0.77.
Diagnosis: Male habitus identical to H. bosnica ( Fig. 42a View FIGURES 42 ).
Taxonomic position and diagnostic characters: See differential diagnosis of H. bosnica .
Habitat: As its siblings, this species usually lives under stones in small fastflowing streams, mainly with siliceous substrates, above 500 m a.s.l. HER: eu19; eu51.
Chorotype: BULG (Bulgarian Endemic).
Distribution: EUR: BU, GR ( Fig. 43 View FIGURE 43 ).
H. leonhardi is endemic to Bulgaria and NE Greece (see Appendix 2 for all the detailed known localities).
DNA data: DNA data: For this species, mtDNA data (COI, 16S rDNA, tRNA leu and NAD1) are available in GenBank ( Ribera et al. 2011; Trizzino et al. 2011b).
74. Hydraena tatii Sáinz-Cantero & Alba-Tercedor 1989
Hydraena (Haenydra) tatii Sáinz-Cantero & Alba-Tercedor 1989: 111 .
Male habitus: Fig. 44a View FIGURES 44 ; male genitalia: Fig. 44d View FIGURES 44 ; female elytral apex: Fig. 44l View FIGURES 44 ; geographic range: Fig. 45 View FIGURE 45 .
Type locality: Spain, Andalusia, Granada province, Sierra Nevada, Sierra Güejar , Arroyo de los Tejos , 1460 a.s.l. (“ Arroyo de los Tejos , Güejar Sierra , 1460 m ”: Sainz-Cantero & Alba-Tercedor 1989) .
Primary types: Holotype at CSG.
Measurements: Length: 2.1 – 2.3 mm. EL/EW = 1.74; PW/PL = 1.42; PW/EW = 0.89.
Diagnosis: Body dark brown to black, legs dark brown, palps pale reddish brown. Labrum with a deep Vshaped notch on anterior margin. Clypeus finely and densely punctate, frons sparsely punctate in middle portion, rugosely punctate nearby the eyes.
Pronotum sub-hexagonal, relatively convex, distinctly wide in the proximal half, posteriorly markedly sinuate and with posterior angle right. Pronotal disc convex, rather densely punctate near anterior and posterior margin, along midline and at posterior foveae. Elytra narrowly elongate, distinctly convex, slightly oval-shaped. Explanate elytral margin moderately wide and relatively long, not reaching apex. Elytral apex acuminate in male, with a Vshaped sutural notch in female ( Figs. 44a,l View FIGURES 44 ). Protibiae very slightly arcuate, male metatibiae with fringe of relatively short setae along mesal face of distal half ( Fig. 44a View FIGURES 44 ).
Taxonomic position and diagnostic characters: Easily diagnosed from other " Haenydra " by peculiar pronotum and elytra in both sexes, and the male genitalia ( Figs. 44a,d,l View FIGURES 44 ). Distinct from its allopatric siblings H. gaditana and H. manfredjaechi solely by the aedeagus, characterized (in lateral view) by a distinctly thinner aedeagal main piece ( Fig. 44d View FIGURES 44 ). DNA data shows close relationships between H. tatii complex and other species usually associated with siliceous substrates ( H. devillei , H. lapidicola , H. hungarica and H. monstruosipes complexes; Trizzino et al. 2011b).
Habitat: This species was collected under stones in fastflowing streams, mainly with siliceous substrates and vegetal organic debris, between 1300 and 1600 m a.s.l. HER: eu8.
Chorotype: SIBE (S Iberian Endemic).
Distribution: EUR: SP ( Fig. 45 View FIGURE 45 ).
H. tatii is endemic to the N portion of Sierra Nevada, S Spain (see Appendix 2 for all the detailed known localities).
DNA data: For this species, mtDNA data (COI, 16S rDNA, tRNA leu and NAD1) are available in GenBank ( Ribera et al. 2011; Trizzino et al. 2011b).
75. Hydraena manfredjaechi Delgado & Soler 1991
Hydraena (Haenydra) manfredjaechi Delgado & Soler 1991: 217 View in CoL .
Male genitalia: Fig. 44e View FIGURES 44 ; female elytral apex: Fig. 44m View FIGURES 44 ; geographic range: Fig. 45 View FIGURE 45 .
Type locality: Spain, Andalusia, Jaen province, Jaen, spring of Rio Segura , 1400 m a.s.l. (“ Nacimiento del río Segura , Jaen , 1400 m ”: Delgado & Soler 1991) .
Primary types: Holotype at CDM.
Measurements: Length: 2.6 – 2.7 mm. EL/EW = 1.74; PW/PL = 1.42; PW/EW = 0.89.
Diagnosis: Male habitus identical to H. tatii ( Fig. 44a View FIGURES 44 ).
Taxonomic position and diagnostic characters: See differential diagnosis of H. tatii .
Habitat: This species was collected under stones in cold and narrow, deep fastflowing streams, mainly with carbonatic substrates and vegetal organic debris, between 850 and 1500 m a.s.l. HER: eu47.
Chorotype: SIBE (S Iberian Endemic).
Distribution: EUR: SP ( Fig. 45 View FIGURE 45 ).
H. manfredjaechi is only known from a few localities in Jaen and Albacete provinces, S Spain (see Appendix 2 for all the detailed known localities).
DNA data: For this species, mtDNA data (COI, 16S rDNA, tRNA leu and NAD1) are available in GenBank ( Ribera et al. 2011; Trizzino et al. 2011b).
76. Hydraena gaditana Lagar & Fresneda 1990
Hydraena (Haenydra) gaditana Lagar & Fresneda 1990: 158 View in CoL .
Male genitalia: Fig. 44f View FIGURES 44 ; female elytral apex: Fig. 44n View FIGURES 44 ; geographic range: Fig. 45 View FIGURE 45 .
Type locality: Spain, Andalusia, Cádiz province, Grazalema, Arroyo del Caserio El Pinar , 660 m a.s.l. (“ Cádiz , Grazalema , Arroyo del Caserio El Pinar , 660 m ”: Lagar & Fresneda 1990) .
Primary types: Holotype at CFB.
Measurements: Length: 2.4 – 2.5 mm. EL/EW = 1.74; PW/PL = 1.42; PW/EW = 0.89.
Diagnosis: Male habitus identical to H. tatii ( Fig. 44a View FIGURES 44 ).
Taxonomic position and diagnostic characters: See differential diagnosis of H. tatii .
Habitat: This species was collected under stones in cold fastflowing streams, mainly with carbonatic substrates, between 300 and 1000 m a.s.l. HER: eu36; eu40.
Chorotype: SIBE (S Iberian Endemic).
Distribution: EUR: SP ( Fig. 45 View FIGURE 45 ).
H. gaditana is known from a few localities in Cádiz and Malaga provinces, S Spain (see Appendix 2 for all the detailed known localities).
DNA data: For this species, mtDNA data (COI, 16S rDNA, tRNA leu and NAD1) are available in GenBank ( Ribera et al. 2011; Trizzino et al. 2011b).
77. Hydraena monstruosipes Ferro 1986
Hydraena (Haenydra) monstruosipes Ferro 1986: 137 View in CoL .
Male habitus: Fig. 44b View FIGURES 44 ; male genitalia: Fig. 44g View FIGURES 44 ; female elytral apex: Fig. 44o View FIGURES 44 ; geographic range: Fig. 45 View FIGURE 45 .
Type locality: Spain, Lugo province , Lugo (“Lugo”: Ferro 1986) .
Primary types: Holotype at CFT.
Measurements: Length: 2.3 – 2.5 mm. EL/EW = 1.78; PW/PL = 1.33; PW/EW = 0.80.
Diagnosis: Body dark brown to black, legs dark brown, palps pale reddish brown. Labrum with a deep Vshaped notch on anterior margin. Clypeus shiny, frons sparsely punctate in middle portion, rugosely punctate nearby the eyes. Segment II of male maxillary palps slightly dilated and shorter than in other " Haenydra ", segment III distinctly dilated, but less that in H. lapidicola .
Pronotum cordiform, notably convex, distinctly wide in middle portion, posteriorly markedly sinuate and with posterior angle right. Pronotal disc convex, rather densely punctate near anterior and posterior margin, along midline and at posterior foveae. Elytra elongate, convex, parallel-sided in the proximal half, apically convergent in both sexes. Explanate elytral margin moderately wide and relatively long, not reaching apex. Elytral apex slightly conjointly rounded in male, moderately sinuate in female ( Figs. 44b,o View FIGURES 44 ).
Male protibiae very slightly dilated in the inner edge of distal half, male mesotibiae distinctly dilated in the inner edge of distal half, and with a prominent spine along mesal face of mesal third; male metatibiae very markedly dilated in the inner edge of distal third and with bushy fringe of long setae along mesal face of distal half. Male profemura with a prominent U-shaped emargination along posterior margin ( Fig. 44b View FIGURES 44 ).
Taxonomic position and diagnostic characters: Easily diagnosed from other " Haenydra " by peculiar male maxillary palps, pronotum and legs ( Fig. 44b View FIGURES 44 ), and the male genitalia, characterized by distinctly small size, by an arrow-shaped apex and by the absence of a mobile distal lobe ( Fig. 44g View FIGURES 44 ). Molecular data suggested a sister-group relationship between H. monstruosipes and H. zezerensis ( Trizzino et al. 2011b) .
Habitat: This species was collected under stones in fastflowing streams with siliceous substrates, between 800 and 1200 m a.s.l. HER: eu16.
Chorotype: CANT (Cantabrian Endemic).
Distribution: EUR: SP ( Fig. 45 View FIGURE 45 ).
H. monstruosipes is endemic to NW Spain (see Appendix 2 for all the detailed known localities).
DNA data: For this species, mtDNA data (COI, 16S rDNA, tRNA leu and NAD1) are available in GenBank ( Ribera et al. 2011; Trizzino et al. 2011b).
78. Hydraena zezerensis Díaz Pazos & Bilton 1995
Hydraena (Haenydra) zezerensis Díaz Pazos & Bilton 1995: 137 View in CoL .
Male habitus: Fig. 44c View FIGURES 44 ; male genitalia: Fig. 44h View FIGURES 44 ; female elytral apex: Fig. 44p View FIGURES 44 ; geographic range: Fig. 45 View FIGURE 45 .
Type locality: Portugal, Beja district, Serra da Estrela, Guarda, Covao de Ametade, Rio Zezere , 1400 m a.s.l. (“ Serra da Estrela , Guarda, Covao de Ametade , 1400 m ”: Díaz Pazos & Bilton 1995) .
Primary types: Holotype at MNCN.
Measurements: Length: 1.9 – 2.1 mm. EL/EW = 1.68; PW/PL = 1.28; PW/EW = 0.74.
Diagnosis: Body dark brown, palps and legs pale reddish brown. Labrum with a deep V-shaped notch on anterior margin. Clypeus shiny, frons sparsely punctate in middle portion, rugosely punctate nearby the eyes.
Pronotum cordiform, notably convex, distinctly wide in middle portion, posteriorly notably sinuate and with posterior angle right as in H. monstruosipes . Pronotal disc convex, rather densely and sparsely punctate in the whole discal surface. Elytra elongate, slightly convex, parallel-sided in the proximal half, apically convergent in both sexes. Explanate elytral margin moderately wide and relatively long, not reaching apex. Elytral apex slightly conjointly rounded in male, moderately sinuate in female ( Figs. 44c,p View FIGURES 44 ).
Male meso- and metatibiae with a prominent spine along mesal face of proximal third; male metatibiae with fringe of long setae along mesal face of distal half. ( Fig. 44c View FIGURES 44 ).
Taxonomic position and diagnostic characters: Easily diagnosed from other " Haenydra " by peculiar pronotum, peculiar male legs ( Fig. 44c View FIGURES 44 ), and the male genitalia, characterized (in lateral view) by a paddle-shaped apex of main piece, and a large distal lobe resembling species of the H. tatii complex ( Table 1; Fig. 44h View FIGURES 44 ).
Habitat: This species was collected under stones in a cold fastflowing stream at 1200 m a.s.l. HER: eu34.
Chorotype: LUSI (Lusitanian Endemic).
Distribution: EUR: PT ( Fig. 45 View FIGURE 45 ).
H. zezerensis is known solely from the type locality, N Portugal (see Appendix 2 for all the detailed known localities) .
DNA data: For this species, mtDNA data (COI, 16S rDNA, tRNA leu and NAD1) are available in GenBank ( Ribera et al. 2011; Trizzino et al. 2011b).
79. Hydraena bensae Ganglbauer 1901
Hydraena (Haenydra) bensae Ganglbauer 1901: 330 View in CoL .
Male habitus: Fig. 46a View FIGURES 46 ; male genitalia: Fig. 46d View FIGURES 46 ; female elytral apex: Fig. 46l View FIGURES 46 ; geographic range: Fig. 47 View FIGURE 47 .
Type locality: Maritimes Alps (“Alpes maritimes”: Ganglbauer 1901, Jäch 1990).
Primary types: Lectotype ( HNHM) designated by Jäch (1990).
Measurements: Length: 2.3 – 2.5 mm. EL/EW = 1.90; PW/PL = 1.38; PW/EW = 0.90.
Diagnosis: Body reddish brown to pale brown, palps and legs pale reddish brown. Labrum with a V-shaped notch on anterior margin. Clypeus finely but not densely punctate, frons sparsely punctate in middle portion, rugosely punctate nearby the eyes.
Pronotum sub-hexagonal, distinctly wide, with external angle rounded; posteriorly sinuate with posterior angle almost right. Pronotal disc convex, rather densely punctate near anterior and posterior margin, along midline and at posterior foveae. Elytra notably elongate, markedly flattened and parallel-sided. Explanate elytral margin wide and relatively long, almost reaching apex. Elytral apex moderately conjointly rounded in male, slightly bifurcate in female ( Figs. 46a,l View FIGURES 46 ).
Male mesotibiae slightly dilated in the inner edge of distal half, male metatibiae very slightly arcuate on the inner edge, and with fringe of long setae along mesal face of distal half (particularly more prominent in the distal third).
Taxonomic position and diagnostic characters: Easily diagnosed from other " Haenydra " by the distinctly elongate and flattened elytra ( Fig. 46a View FIGURES 46 ). Distinct from other members of the H. polita complex ( Table 1) by the differently shaped female elytral apex ( Fig. 46l View FIGURES 46 ) and the aedeagal main piece, which is notably straight and long, and characterized (in lateral view) by a U-shaped emargination on the dorsal margin of apical third and by a hookshaped apex ( Fig. 46d View FIGURES 46 ).
Habitat: This species usually lives under stones in cold fastflowing streams, mostly on carbonatic substrates, between 150 and 1400 m a.s.l. HER: eu3; eu17; eu21.
Chorotype: ALSW (SW Alpine Endemic).
Distribution: EUR: FR-FRA, IT-ITA ( Fig. 47 View FIGURE 47 ).
H. bensae is endemic to both French and Italian slopes of Maritimes Alps (see Appendix 2 for all the detailed known localities).
DNA data: For this species, mtDNA data (COI, 16S rDNA, tRNA leu and NAD1) are available in GenBank
( Ribera et al. 2011; Trizzino et al. 2011b).
80. Hydraena polita Kiesenwetter 1849
Hydraena polita Kiesenwetter 1849: 178 View in CoL ;
Hydraena (Haenydra) cavernicola Jeannel 1920: 14 ; Pretner 1931c: 113.
Male habitus: Fig. 46b View FIGURES 46 ; male genitalia: Fig. 46e View FIGURES 46 ; female elytral apex: Fig. 46m View FIGURES 46 ; geographic range: Fig. 47 View FIGURE 47 .
Type locality: southern Germany (“südlichen Deutschland”: Kiesenwetter 1849) .
Primary types: Holotype / Lectotype not yet formally designated. Type series in ZSM .
Measurements: Length: 2.3 – 2.5 mm. EL/EW = 1.72; PW/PL = 1.42; PW/EW = 0.77.
Diagnosis: Body reddish brown to pale brown, palps and legs pale reddish brown. Labrum with a deep Vshaped notch on anterior margin. Clypeus finely and densely punctate, frons densely punctate in middle portion, rugosely punctate nearby the eyes.
Pronotum sub-hexagonal, distinctly wide, with anterior margin concave and external angle rounded. Pronotal disc convex, rather densely punctate near anterior and posterior margin, along midline and at posterior foveae. Elytra notably elongate, markedly flattened and parallel-sided. Explanate elytral margin distinctly wide and long, reaching apex. Elytral apex conjointly rounded in male, conjointly rounded and with a very slightly prominent Vshaped notch in female ( Figs. 46b,m View FIGURES 46 ). Male mesotibiae with a V-shaped emargination within the distinctly prominent row of teeth along the inner edge of distal half, male metatibiae notably arcuate on the inner edge, and with fringe of long setae along mesal face of distal half ( Fig. 46b View FIGURES 46 ).
Taxonomic position and diagnostic characters: Easily diagnosed from other " Haenydra " by the distinctly elongate and flattened elytra, and the peculiarly shaped meso- and metatibiae ( Fig. 46b View FIGURES 46 ). Distinct from other members of the H. polita complex ( Table 1) by the differently shaped female elytral apex ( Fig. 46m View FIGURES 46 ), the peculiarly shaped meso- and metatibiae ( Fig. 46b View FIGURES 46 ), and the aedeagal main piece, characterized (in lateral view) by a V-shaped hump on the dorsal margin of apical third, and an obliquely truncate apex ( Fig. 46e View FIGURES 46 )
Habitat: This species usually lives under stones in small fastflowing streams with carbonatic substrates, mostly between 500 and 1000 m a.s.l. HER: Heterotopic species.
Chorotype: CEU (Central-European).
Distribution: EUR: AU, FR-FRA, GE, SP, SZ ( Fig. 47 View FIGURE 47 ).
H. polita has a Central and W European distribution, ranging from Switzerland to E Spain (see Appendix 2 for all the detailed known localities).
DNA data: For this species, mtDNA data (COI, 16S rDNA, tRNA leu and NAD1) are available in GenBank
( Ribera et al. 2011; Trizzino et al. 2011b).
81. Hydraena bicuspidata Ganglbauer 1901
Hydraena (Haenydra) bicuspidata Ganglbauer 1901: 330 View in CoL .
Male habitus: Fig. 46c View FIGURES 46 ; male genitalia: Fig. 46f View FIGURES 46 ; female elytral apex: Fig. 46n View FIGURES 46 ; geographic range: Fig. 47 View FIGURE 47 .
Type locality: France, Rhône-Alpes, Saint Romain en Giers (“Sudfrankreich. Saint Romain en Gier”: Ganglbauer 1901; Jäch, 1990).
Primary types: Lectotype ( HNHM) designated by Jäch (1990).
Measurements: Length: 2.1 – 2.2 mm. EL/EW = 1.80; PW/PL = 1.42; PW/EW = 0.90.
Diagnosis: Body dark brown to black, palps and legs pale reddish brown. Labrum with a V-shaped notch on anterior margin. Clypeus densely punctate, frons sparsely punctate in middle portion, rugosely punctate nearby the eyes. Pronotum sub-hexagonal, relatively wide, with anterior margin concave; posteriorly slightly sinuate with posterior angle almost right. Pronotal disc convex, rather densely punctate near anterior and posterior margin, along midline and at posterior foveae. Elytra elongate, markedly flattened and parallel-sided. Explanate elytral margin wide and relatively long, almost reaching apex. Elytral apex slightly conjointly rounded in male, distinctly bifurcate in female ( Figs. 46c,n View FIGURES 46 ). Male pro-, meso- and metatibiae not dilated, male metatibiae with fringe of long setae along mesal face of distal half (particularly more prominent in the distal third).
Taxonomic position and diagnostic characters: Distinct from other members of the H. polita complex ( Table 1) by the differently shaped male and female elytral apex ( Figs. 46c,n View FIGURES 46 ) and the aedeagal main piece, which is shorter than in related species, and characterized (in lateral view) by a wide and paddle-shaped apex ( Fig. 46d View FIGURES 46 ).
Habitat: This species was collected under stones in cold fastflowing streams, on carbonatic substrates, between 150 and 1100 m a.s.l. HER: eu28.
Chorotype: FRCE (Central E - French Endemic).
Distribution: EUR: FR-FRA ( Fig. 47 View FIGURE 47 ).
H. bicuspidata is known from a few sites in surroundings of the type locality and from Mt. Pilat, in easternmost portions of the Central Massif (see Appendix 2 for all the detailed known localities).
DNA data: For this species, mtDNA data (COI, 16S rDNA, tRNA leu and NAD1) are available in GenBank ( Trizzino et al. 2011b).
82. Hydraena bitruncata d’Orchymont 1934
Hydraena (Haenydra) bitruncata d’Orchymont 1934b: 11 View in CoL .
Male genitalia: Fig. 46g View FIGURES 46 ; female elytral apex: Fig. 46o View FIGURES 46 ; geographic range: Fig. 47 View FIGURE 47 .
Type locality: France, Pyrénées-Orientales , Céret , Corsavy , Riufarré, 1000 m a.s.l. (“ Pyrenees-Orientaes, Bassin du Tech, Corsavy N. W., versant S. du Puig de l’Estelle, ruisseau Riufarré ”: d’Orchymont 1934b) .
Primary types: Holotype at ISNB.
Measurements: Length: 2.1 – 2.2 mm. EL/EW = 1.80; PW/PL = 1.42; PW/EW = 0.90.
Diagnosis: Male habitus almost identical to H. bicuspidata ( Fig. 46c View FIGURES 46 ), with explanate elytral margin slightly wider, and male metatibial pubescence more prominent than in related species.
Taxonomic position and diagnostic characters: See differential diagnosis of H. bicuspidata .
Habitat: This species usually lives under stones in cold fastflowing streams between 700 and 1400 m a.s.l. HER: Heterotopic species.
Chorotype: PYRE (Pyrenean Endemic).
Distribution: EUR: FR-FRA, SP ( Fig. 47 View FIGURE 47 ).
H. bitruncata is endemic to both French and Spanish slopes of Pyrenees. A single female was reported as having been collected in a locality in Central Spain (Ávila; Balfour-Browne 1978; Valladares & Montes 1991);this citation is very doubtful, and it is probably due to a partial labelling mistake/interpretation. In fact, the locality of
Riera de Merles, situated south of Barcelona, most likely corresponds to the headwaters of this river, in the Begueda, i.e. within the range of the other records of the species. (I. Ribera personal communication; see Appendix 2 for all the detailed known localities).
DNA data: For this species, mtDNA data (COI, 16S rDNA, tRNA leu and NAD1) are available in GenBank ( Ribera et al. 2011; Trizzino et al. 2011b).
83. Hydraena catalonica Fresneda, Aguilera & Hernando 1994
Hydraena (Haenydra) catalonica Fresneda, Aguilera & Hernando 1994: 81 View in CoL .
Male genitalia: Fig. 46h View FIGURES 46 ; female elytral apex: Fig. 46p View FIGURES 46 ; geographic range: Fig. 47 View FIGURE 47 .
Type locality: Spain, Catalonia, Lleida province, Sierra Cadí , riera de Cornellana, 1350 m a.s.l. (“Lleida, Fornols, riera de Cornellana, 1350 m ”: Fresneda et al. 1994) .
Primary types: Holotype at CFB.
Measurements: Length: 2.1 – 2.2 mm. EL/EW = 1.80; PW/PL = 1.42; PW/EW = 0.90.
Diagnosis: Male habitus almost identical to H. bicuspidata ( Fig. 46c View FIGURES 46 ).
Taxonomic position and diagnostic characters: See differential diagnosis of H. bicuspidata .
Habitat: This species was collected under stones in cold fastflowing streams, mainly above 800 m a.s.l. HER: eu6; eu50.
Chorotype: PYRE (Pyrenean Endemic).
Distribution: EUR: SP ( Fig. 47 View FIGURE 47 ).
H. catalonica is endemic to Catalonia (see Appendix 2 for all the detailed known localities).
DNA data: For this species, mtDNA data (COI, 16S rDNA, tRNA leu and NAD1) are available in GenBank ( Ribera et al. 2011; Trizzino et al. 2011b).
84. Hydraena dentipes Germar 1824
Hydraena dentipes Germar 1824: 22 View in CoL .
Male habitus: Fig. 48a View FIGURES 48 ; male genitalia: Fig. 48e View FIGURES 48 ; female elytral apex: Fig. 48m View FIGURES 48 ; geographic range: Fig. 49 View FIGURE 49 .
Type locality: France ( Germar 1824) .
Primary types: Holotype / Lectotype not yet formally designated. Type series probably destroyed.
Measurements: Length: 1.9 – 2.1 mm. EL/EW = 1.94; PW/PL = 1.42; PW/EW = 0.97.
Diagnosis: Body dark brown to black, legs dark brown, palps pale reddish brown. Labrum with a deep Vshaped notch on anterior margin. Clypeus shiny, frons sparsely punctate in middle portion, rugosely punctate nearby the eyes. Pronotum sub-hexagonal, convex, distinctly wide in middle portion, posteriorly sinuate and with posterior angle right. Pronotal disc convex, rather densely punctate near anterior and posterior margin, along midline and at posterior foveae. Elytra relatively elongate, narrow and convex, parallel-sided in the proximal half, apically convergent in both sexes. Explanate elytral margin moderately narrow and relatively long, not reaching apex. Elytral apex slightly acuminate in male, moderately sinuate in female ( Figs. 48a,e View FIGURES 48 ).
Male protibiae dilated in the inner edge of distal half. Male pro- and and mesotibiae with a prominent tooth in the inner edge of distal third. Male metatibiae with a small spine in the inner pre-apical portion of the distinctly dilated distal half, and with fringe of relatively short setae along mesal face of proximal 2/3. ( Fig. 48a View FIGURES 48 ).
Taxonomic position and diagnostic characters: Easily diagnosed from other " Haenydra " by the peculiarly shaped male legs ( Fig. 48a View FIGURES 48 ). Despite the peculiar body shape, male genitalia of this species, characterized (in lateral view) by a bifurcate apex and a notably short flagellum on the left side of apical third ( Fig. 48m View FIGURES 48 ), suggest relationships with H. heterogyna , H. producta and allies, as confirmed by molecular data (Ribera et al., Trizzino et al. 2011b).
Habitat: This species usually lives under stones in fastflowing streams with siliceous substrates, between 150 and 1200 m a.s.l. HER: Heterotopic species.
Chorotype: CEU (Central - European).
Distribution: EUR: AU, BE, CZ, FR-FRA, GE, IT-ITA, LU, PL, RO, SK, SL ( Fig. 49 View FIGURE 49 ).
H. dentipes is widely distributed in Central Europe, ranging from France to Rumania (see Appendix 2 for all the detailed known localities).
DNA data: For this species, mtDNA data (COI, 16S rDNA, tRNA leu and NAD1) are available in GenBank ( Ribera et al. 2011; Trizzino et al. 2011b).
85. Hydraena heterogyna Bedel 1898
Hydraena heterogyna Bedel 1898: 292 View in CoL ;
Hydraena (Haenydra) italica Ganglbauer 1901: 328 View in CoL ; Fiori 1904: 248; Audisio & De Biase 1995: 168;
Hydraena (Haenydra) italica var. bidentata Ganglbauer 1901: 329 ; Fiori 1904: 251; d’Orchymont 1934a: 162; Audisio & De Biase 1995: 168;
Hydraena (Haenydra) italica var. doderoi Ganglbauer 1901: 329 ; Fiori 1904: 251; d’Orchymont 1930: 371; Audisio & De Biase 1995: 168;
Hydraena italica var. portai Fiori 1904: 251 ; Knisch 1924: 48; d’Orchymont 1934a: 162; Audisio & De Biase 1995: 170;
Hydraena italica var. ganglbaueri Fiori 1904: 251 ; Knisch 1924: 48; d’Orchymont 1934a: 162; Audisio & De Biase 1995: 170;
Hydraena (Haenydra) tyrolensis Janssens 1967: 1 ; Jäch 1989: 190; Audisio & De Biase 1995: 170;
Hydraena (Haenydra) heterogyna ssp. binaghii Jäch 1989: 190 View in CoL ; Audisio & De Biase 1995: 170.
Male habitus: Fig. 48b View FIGURES 48 ; male genitalia: Fig. 48f View FIGURES 48 ; female elytral apex: Fig. 48n,o,p View FIGURES 48 ; geographic range: Fig. 49 View FIGURE 49 .
Type locality: France, Maritimes Alps , Nice, Saint-Martin Vésubie (“Alpes-Maritimes, Saint-Martin- Vesubie”: Bedel 1898) .
Primary types: Holotype / Lectotype not yet formally designated. Type series in MNHN .
Measurements: Length: 2. 0 – 2.2 mm. EL/EW = 1.55; PW/PL = 1.30; PW/EW = 0.70.
Diagnosis: Body dark brown to black, palps and legs pale reddish brown. Labrum with V-shaped notch on anterior margin. Clypeus finely, but not densely, punctate, frons densely punctate in middle portion, rugosely punctate nearby the eyes.
Pronotum cordiform, more or less wide, pronotal disc convex, rather densely punctate near anterior and posterior margin, along midline and at posterior foveae. Elytra slightly elongate, distinctly flattened, parallel-sided in the proximal half, apically convergent. Explanate elytral margin markedly wide and relatively long, almost reaching apex ( Fig. 48b View FIGURES 48 ). Elytral apex slightly acuminate in male, variably shaped in female, where the apex could be conjointly rounded, obtusely truncate, partially or completely bifurcate ( Figs. 48n,o,p View FIGURES 48 ; see also Binaghi 1960). Male pro-, meso- and metatibiae not dilated. Male metatibiae with fringe of relatively long setae along mesal face of distal half.
Taxonomic position and diagnostic characters: Easily diagnosed from other members of the H. heterogyna complex ( Table 1) by the flattened and explanate elytra ( Fig. 48b View FIGURES 48 ), the peculiarly variable female elytra apices ( Figs. 48n,o,p View FIGURES 48 ), and the male genitalia, characterized (in lateral view) by a wide and peculiarly shaped apex, and a notably short and relatively thick flagellum on the left side of apical third ( Fig. 48f View FIGURES 48 ).
Habitat: This species usually lives under stones in small fastflowing streams, mostly in forests with broadleaved trees, and chiefly in Fagus forests, between 100 and 1300 m a.s.l. HER: Heterotopic species.
Chorotype: ITAL (Italian Endemic).
Distribution: EUR: FR-FRA, IT-ITA, SZ ( Fig. 49 View FIGURE 49 ).
H. heterogyna s.l. (see below) is distributed in SE France (Maritimes Alps), in Switzerland (exclusively in SE valleys hydrographically belonging to Italian mainland) and in peninsular Italy (also including Elba Island), southwards to N Calabria (see Appendix 2 for all the detailed known localities).
Taxonomic remarks: On the basis of the huge apparent variability of female elytral apex (and partially also of aedeagal apex or of male elytral apex), several taxonomists introduced a series of species/subspecies/varieties within the nominal taxon Hydraena heterogyna ( Ganglbauer 1901; Fiori 1904; Binaghi, 1960; Janssens 1967; Jäch 1989). More recently, Audisio & De Biase (1995) remarked that, despite the great and discontinuous variability of the female elytra, the shape variations of the aedeagal apex (see Figs. 8,10,11,12, 13 in Audisio & De Biase 1995) apparently follow a relatively gradual geographic cline from East to West and from North to South along the Italian Peninsula, thus suggesting that all the different female morphotypes may belong to a single and variable species.
Recent molecular data (Ribera et al. unpublished data), also supported by new morphological evidence (Trizzino et al. unpublished data), seem to suggest that a pair of cryptic and probably parapatric species (whose respective distribution and taxonomic/ nomenclatorial characterization remain to be more clearly disentangled by further molecular and morphological analyses), could actually be present in Peninsular Italy within “ H. heterogyna s.l. ” (Trizzino et al. unpublished data). Waiting for further molecular analyses, which are nearing completion, in this contribution we prefer to maintain H. heterogyna s.l. as a single variable species.
DNA data: For this species, mtDNA data (COI, 16S rDNA, tRNA leu and NAD1) are available in GenBank ( Ribera et al. 2011; Trizzino et al. 2011b).
86. Hydraena plumipes Rey 1886
Hydraena (Haenydra) plumipes View in CoL (Baudi i.l.) Rey 1886: 99;
Hydraena (Haenydra) italica var. procera Ganglbauer 1901: 330 ; Chiesa 1958: 99.
Male habitus: Fig. 48c View FIGURES 48 ; male genitalia: Fig. 48g View FIGURES 48 ; female elytral apex: Fig. 48q View FIGURES 48 ; geographic range: Fig. 49 View FIGURE 49 .
Type locality: Italy, Apennines (“Apennins”: Rey 1886), certainly on Tosco-Emiliano Apennine .
Primary types: Holotype / Lectotype not yet formally designated; type material apparently lost according to d’Orchymont 1933).
Measurements: Length: 2.3 – 2.4 mm. EL/EW = 1.60; PW/PL = 1.50; PW/EW = 0.83.
Diagnosis: Body dark brown to black, palps and legs pale reddish brown. Labrum with V-shaped notch on anterior margin. Clypeus shiny, frons densely punctate in middle portion, rugosely punctate nearby the eyes.
Pronotum hexagonal, distinctly wide and convex, pronotal disc convex, rather densely punctate near anterior and posterior margin, along midline and at posterior foveae. Elytra slightly elongate, distinctly flattened, parallelsided. Explanate elytral margin relatively wide and long, almost reaching apex. Elytral apex slightly acuminate in male, distinctly bifurcate in female ( Figs. 48c,q View FIGURES 48 ). Male pro-, meso- and metatibiae not dilated, male metatibiae with bushy fringe of distinctly long setae along mesal face of distal half ( Fig. 48c View FIGURES 48 ).
Taxonomic position and diagnostic characters: Easily diagnosed from other members of the H. heterogyna complex ( Table 1) by the wide and convex pronotum ( Fig. 48c View FIGURES 48 ), the prominent pubescence of male metatibiae ( Fig. 48c View FIGURES 48 ), the peculiarly shaped female elytral apex ( Fig. 48q View FIGURES 48 ), and the male genitalia, characterized (in lateral view) by a distinctly wide and paddle-shaped apex ( Fig. 48g View FIGURES 48 ).
Habitat: This species usually lives under stones in small fastflowing streams, chiefly in Fagus forests, between 250 and 1500 m a.s.l. HER: eu18; eu84. Chorotype: APPN (N Apenninic Endemic). Distribution: EUR: IT-ITA ( Fig. 49 View FIGURE 49 ). H. plumipes is endemic to Tosco-Emiliano Apennine (see Appendix 2 for all the detailed known localities). DNA data: For this species, mtDNA data (COI, 16S rDNA, tRNA leu and NAD1) are available in GenBank ( Trizzino et al. 2011b; Ribera et al. 2011).
87. Hydraena discreta Ganglbauer 1904
Hydraena (Haenydra) monticola View in CoL auct.: Ganglbauer 1901: 328 (partim), nec Rey 1886: 30; Pretner 1931a: 79;
Hydraena (Haenydra) italica ssp. discreta Ganglbauer 1904: 210 View in CoL (partim);
? Hydraena italica View in CoL ab. prolongata Fiori 1904: 250;
Hydraena (Haenydra) discreta View in CoL ; Pretner 1931a: 78.
Male habitus: Fig. 48d View FIGURES 48 ; male genitalia: Fig. 48h View FIGURES 48 ; female elytral apex: Fig. 48r View FIGURES 48 ; geographic range: Fig. 49 View FIGURE 49 .
Type locality: Italy, Liguria, Genova province, Busalla (“Oberitalien”: Ganglbauer 1904; “Busalla”: Jäch 1990).
Primary types: Lectotype ( NMW) designated by Jäch (1990).
Measurements: Length: 2. 0 – 2.1 mm. EL/EW = 1.75; PW/PL = 1.55; PW/EW = 0.83.
Diagnosis: Body dark brown to black, palps and legs pale reddish brown. Labrum with V-shaped notch on anterior margin. Clypeus shiny, frons densely punctate in middle portion, rugosely punctate nearby the eyes.
Pronotum sub-hexagonal, relatively wide, pronotal disc convex, rather densely punctate near anterior and posterior margin, along midline and at posterior foveae. Elytra slightly elongate, flattened, parallel-sided in the proximal half, apically convergent. Explanate elytral margin relatively wide and long, almost reaching apex. Elytral apex obtusely truncate in female ( Figs. 48d,r View FIGURES 48 ). Male pro-, meso- and metatibiae not dilated, male metatibiae with fringe of long setae along mesal face of distal half.
Taxonomic position and diagnostic characters: Easily diagnosed from other members of the H. heterogyna complex ( Table 1) by the relatively narrowed male elytral apex ( Fig. 48d View FIGURES 48 ), the peculiarly shaped female elytra apices ( Fig. 48r View FIGURES 48 ), and the male genitalia, characterized (in lateral view) by a distinctly narrow main piece, and by a distal lobe longer than in related species ( Fig. 48h View FIGURES 48 ).
Habitat: This species usually lives under stones in small fastflowing streams, mainly with carbonatic substrates, between 60 and 1000 m a.s.l. HER: eu18.
Chorotype: APPN (N-Apenninic Endemic).
Distribution: EUR: IT-ITA ( Fig. 49 View FIGURE 49 ).
H. discreta is endemic to NW Italy, from Liguria to W Emilia and NW Tuscany, with a pair of isolated records also in S Piedmont (Alessandria and Cuneo provinces). See Appendix 2 for all the detailed known localities ).
DNA data: For this species, mtDNA data (COI, 16S rDNA, tRNA leu and NAD1) are available in GenBank ( Trizzino et al. 2011b; Ribera et al. 2011).
88. Hydraena producta Mulsant & Rey 1852
Hydraena producta Mulsant & Rey 1852: 299 View in CoL .
Male genitalia: Fig. 48l View FIGURES 48 ; female elytral apex: Fig. 48s View FIGURES 48 ; geographic range: Fig. 49 View FIGURE 49 .
Type locality: France, Rhône-Alpes, Avenas (“Avenas”: Mulsant & Rey 1852) .
Primary types: Holotype / Lectotype not yet formally designated. Type series in MHNL .
Measurements: Length: 1.9 – 2.1 mm. EL/EW = 1.75; PW/PL = 1.55; PW/EW = 0.83.
Diagnosis: Male habitus almost identical to H. discreta ( Fig. 48d View FIGURES 48 ), with slightly narrower explanate elytral margin.
Taxonomic position and diagnostic characters: See differential diagnosis of H. discreta .
Habitat: This species usually lives under stones in small fastflowing streams, above 500 m a.s.l. HER: eu28.
Chorotype: FRCE (Central E-French Endemic).
Distribution: EUR: FR-FRA ( Fig. 49 View FIGURE 49 ).
H. producta is endemic to Central E France (see Appendix 2 for all the detailed known localities).
DNA data: For this species, mtDNA data (COI, 16S rDNA, tRNA leu and NAD1) are available in GenBank ( Ribera et al. 2011; Trizzino et al. 2011b).
Species of uncertain taxonomic position
89. Hydraena sappho Janssens 1965
Hydraena (Haenydra) sappho Janssens 1965: 104 View in CoL .
Male habitus: Fig. 50a View FIGURES 50 ; male genitalia: Fig. 50b View FIGURES 50 ; female: unknown.
Type locality: Greece, Preveza province , Lefkada Island, road between Lefkada and Spanochori (“île de Leucade ”: Janssens 1965) .
Primary types: Holotype at ISNB.
Measurements: Length: 2.3 mm. EL/EW = 1.68; PW/PL = 1.30; PW/EW = 0.77.
Diagnosis: Body dark brown to black, palps and legs pale reddish brown. Labrum with V-shaped notch on anterior margin. Clypeus shiny, frons densely punctate in middle portion, rugosely punctate nearby the eyes.
Pronotum sub-hexagonal, relatively wide, posteriorly sinuate and with posterior angle right. Pronotal disc convex, rather densely punctate near anterior and posterior margin, along midline and at posterior foveae. Elytra elongate, distinctly convex, parallel-sided in the proximal half, apically convergent. Explanate elytral margin relatively narrow and long, not reaching apex. Male elytral apex acuminate ( Fig. 50a View FIGURES 50 ). Male pro-, meso- and metatibiae not dilated, male metatibiae with fringe of relatively long setae along mesal face of distal half.
Taxonomic position and diagnostic characters: This species is currently known only from a single male specimen (Holotype; ISNB) collected by Janssens in 1961. As reported by recent authors ( Jäch 1989; Audisio et al. 1996), the type locality of H. sappho was lately destroyed by human activity. Furthermore, the male genitalia of the holotype was badly prepared, and subsequently crushed, by Janssens between two glasses, thus the illustrated aedeagus could slightly differ in terms of shape and spatial orientation ( Fig. 50b View FIGURES 50 ; see also Janssens 1965 and Audisio et al. 1996).
The damaged aedeagus, combined with the impossibility to collect additional specimens (vane attempts have been made by different specialists in several rivers and small streams both in Lefkada Island and in the contiguous areas of the W Greece mainland), preclude making definitive relationships among this species and the remaining " Haenydra ".
However, mainly based on the shape of male genitalia, Audisio et al. (1996) hypothesized a relationship between H. sappho and species of the H. tatii complex (proposing a " Hydraena sappho group"). Otherwise, M. Jäch (personal communication 2010; see also Ribera et al. 2011), mainly based on external morphology, and taking into account that the aedeagal distal lobe of the HT is deformed, suggested possible affinities between H. sappho and members of the H. excisa complex ( Table 1).
Habitat: The HT of H. sappho was collected in a small stream with siliceous substrate.
Chorotype: GRNW? (NW-Greek Endemic).
Distribution: EUR: GR-Lefkada (Fig. 51).
Note: Excluding a labeling mistake by Janssens, this species is probably extinct.
DNA data: No data.
Key to identification of male specimens of Hydraena species belonging to “ Haenydra ”
1 (2) Protibiae at distal third bearing a distinct sharp tooth directed inwards ( Fig. 48a View FIGURES 48 ); metatibiae bearing a distinct nearly distal sharp tooth directed inwards and backwards ( Fig. 48a View FIGURES 48 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Fig. 48e View FIGURES 48 ). Central Europe ( Fig. 49 View FIGURE 49 )................................................................................ 84. dentipes Germar 1842 View in CoL
2 (1) Protibiae without tooth directed inwards, in some species only with widely obtusely dilated projection directed inwards ( Fig. 40a View FIGURES 40 ); metatibiae without nearly distal sharp tooth directed inwards and backwards........................... 3
3 (4) Mesotibiae bearing a distinct sharp tooth directed inwards ( Figs. 44 View FIGURES 44 b-c)...................................... 5
4 (3) Mesotibiae never bearing a distinct sharp tooth directed inwards (e.g., Figs. 38a View FIGURES 38 and 40b View FIGURES 40 ), in some species only with more or less widely obtusely dilated projection directed inwards ( Figs. 12a View FIGURES 12 , 40a View FIGURES 40 ), or with marked mesal emargination ( Fig. 46b View FIGURES 46 ). 7
5 (6) Metatibiae markedly dilated at distal half ( Fig. 44b View FIGURES 44 ; Appendix 3a-b); metafemura with a strong, deep and narrow emargination along posterior edge of their proximal half ( Fig. 44b View FIGURES 44 ); segment III of maxillary palps markedly enlarged, much wider than protarsi ( Fig. 44b View FIGURES 44 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Fig. 44g View FIGURES 44 ). NW Spain ( Fig. 45 View FIGURE 45 )........ 77. monstruosipes Ferro 1986 View in CoL
6 (5) Metatibiae bearing a distinct sharp tooth directed inwards at proximal third ( Fig. 44c View FIGURES 44 ; Appendix 3c-d); metafemura without strong, deep and narrow emargination along posterior edge of their proximal half ( Fig. 44c View FIGURES 44 ); segment III of maxillary palps not enlarged, slightly wider than protarsi ( Fig. 44c View FIGURES 44 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Fig. 44h View FIGURES 44 ). Portugal ( Fig. 45 View FIGURE 45 )....................................................................... 78. zezerensis Díaz Pazos & Bilton 1995 View in CoL
7 (8) Mesotibiae at mesal third with widely obtusely dilated projection directed inwards ( Figs. 12a View FIGURES 12 , 40a View FIGURES 40 ).................. 9
8 (7) Mesotibiae at mesal third without widely obtusely dilated projection directed inwards, in some species only with moderately dilated mesotibial distal portion (e.g., Figs. 16a View FIGURES 16 , 18a View FIGURES 18 and 20a View FIGURES 20 ), or with marked mesal emargination ( Fig. 46b View FIGURES 46 ).... 17
9 (10) Protibiae simple, without even obtusely dilated projection directed inwards ( Fig. 12a View FIGURES 12 ); mesotibiae at mesal third with less evidently obtusely dilated projection ( Fig. 12a View FIGURES 12 ; Appendix 3h); metatibiae with peculiarly long, dense, and developed hairs on inner edges ( Fig. 12a View FIGURES 12 ; Appendix 3l); ventral surface of profemura without fringe of hairs. Male genitalia as figured ( Figs. 12 c, d, e View FIGURES 12 ); four distinct aedeagal setae present. Species from Iberian Peninsula.......................... 11
10 (9) Protibiae with distinct obtusely dilated projection directed inwards ( Fig. 40a View FIGURES 40 ); mesotibiae at mesal third with more evidently obtusely dilated projection ( Fig. 40a View FIGURES 40 ; Appendix 3m); metatibiae with less long, dense, and developed hairs on inner edges ( Fig. 40a View FIGURES 40 ; Appendix 3n); ventral surface of profemura with fringe of hairs. Male genitalia as figured ( Figs. 40 c, d View FIGURES 40 ); three distinct aedeagal setae present. Species from Italian Peninsula and marginally bordering areas................ 15
11 (12) Dorsal outline of the main piece of the aedeagus in lateral view armed with a distinct predistal tooth ( Fig. 12 e View FIGURES 12 ). Central Spain (Sierra Madrona) ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 )................................ 7. madronensis Castro, García & Ferreras 2000 View in CoL
12 (11) Dorsal outline of the main piece of the aedeagus in lateral view without predistal tooth ( Figs. 12 c, d View FIGURES 12 ). Most of Iberian Peninsula ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 )................................................................................... 13
13 (14) Mesal portion of dorsal outline of the aedeagal main piece in lateral view with markedly distinct projection, and distal apex nearly hook-shaped ( Fig. 12d View FIGURES 12 ). Central W Spain (Sierra de Altamira) ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 )........................................................................................ 6. altamirensis Díaz Pazos & Garrido Gonzalez 1993 View in CoL
14 (13) Mesal portion of dorsal edge of the aedeagal main piece in lateral view without projection, and distal apex obliquely truncate, not nearly hook-shaped ( Fig. 12c View FIGURES 12 ). Most of Iberian Peninsula ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 )............ 5. iberica d’Orchymont 1936 View in CoL
15 (16) Proximal half of aedeagal main piece markedly more curved in lateral view ( Fig. 40d View FIGURES 40 ). NE Italy, NW Slovenia, NW Croatia ( Fig. 41 View FIGURE 41 )............................................................. 68. devincta d’Orchymont 1940 View in CoL
16 (15) Proximal half of aedeagal main piece markedly less curved in lateral view ( Fig. 40c View FIGURES 40 ). SE France, NW and peninsular Italy ( Fig. 41 View FIGURE 41 ).................................................................. 67. devillei Ganglbauer 1901 View in CoL
17 (18) Segment II and III of maxillary palps markedly enlarged, much wider than protarsi ( Fig. 40b View FIGURES 40 )..................... 19
18 (17) Segment II and III of maxillary palps not enlarged, slightly wider than protarsi (e.g., Figs. 42a View FIGURES 42 and 44a View FIGURES 44 )............ 21
19 (20) Distal half of the aedeagal main piece markedly wider and dorsally more curved in lateral view ( Fig. 40e View FIGURES 40 ). Central Europe, southwards to W Liguria ( Fig. 41 View FIGURE 41 )........................................... 69. lapidicola Kiesenwetter 1849 View in CoL
20 (19) Distal half of aedeagal main piece markedly narrower and dorsally less curved in lateral view ( Fig. 40f View FIGURES 40 ). NW Italy (E Liguria, W Tuscany) ( Fig. 41 View FIGURE 41 ).......................................... 70. sanfilippoi (Audisio & De Biase 1995)
21 (22) Metatibiae markedly curved ( Fig. 46b View FIGURES 46 ); mesotibiae at mesal third with marked denticulate emargination ( Fig. 46b View FIGURES 46 ; Appendix 3g). Male genitalia as figured ( Fig. 46e View FIGURES 46 ). Mostly in Central Europe ( Fig. 47 View FIGURE 47 )......... 80. polita Kiesenwetter 1849 View in CoL
22 (21) Metatibiae not curved; mesotibiae without emargination at mesal third........................................ 23
23 (24) Metatibiae lacking a fringe of distinct and well-developed hairs along their inner edges, represented, in fact, only by a series of short and moderately distinct setae ( Figs. 10a, c View FIGURES 10 ). Male genitalia as figured, with a single seta ( Figs. 10d, g View FIGURES 10 ). Central-eastern Europe ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 )........................................................................ 25
24 (23) Metatibiae always bearing a well-developed fringe of long hairs along distal half or at least distal third of their inner edges (e.g., Figs. 10b View FIGURES 10 , 22a, b View FIGURES 22 , and 44a View FIGURES 44 ). Male genitalia with two to five setae (e.g., Figs. 22d, e View FIGURES 22 , 34e View FIGURES 34 , and 44e View FIGURES 44 )............ 27
25 (26) Metatibiae distinctly dilated medially ( Fig. 10c View FIGURES 10 ; Appendix 3e). Male genitalia as figured ( Fig. 10g View FIGURES 10 ). Slovenia and NE Italy ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 ).................................................................... 2. carniolica Pretner 1970 View in CoL
26 (25) Metatibiae not at all dilated medially ( Fig. 10a View FIGURES 10 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Fig. 10d View FIGURES 10 ). Central-eastern Europe, including NE Italy (Friuli-Venezia Giulia; fig. 11)............................................ 1. schuleri Ganglbauer 1901 View in CoL
27 (28) Metatibiae bearing a well-developed fringe of long hairs only along distal third of their inner edges, the hairs on the middle portion being much shorter and less evident ( Fig. 10b View FIGURES 10 ; Appendix 3o). Male genitalia as figured ( Figs. 10e, f View FIGURES 10 )......... 29
28 (27) Metatibiae bearing a well-developed fringe of long hairs at least along the whole distal half of their inner edges (e.g., Figs. 22a, b View FIGURES 22 and 44a View FIGURES 44 ). Male genitalia differently shaped....................................................... 31
29 (30) Main piece of the aedeagus in lateral view thinner and narrower, particularly in mesal third ( Fig. 10f View FIGURES 10 ); distal flagellum distinctly longer and more developed than in the following species. southern Greece (Peloponnesus) ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 ).......................................................................................... 4. aroensis (Ferro 1992)
30 (29) Main piece of the aedeagus in lateral view thicker and wider, particularly in mesal third ( Fig. 10e View FIGURES 10 ); distal flagellum distinctly shorter and less developed than in the preceding species. Balkans excluding Peloponnesus ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 ).................................................................................... 3. subintegra Ganglbauer 1901 View in CoL
31 (32) Distal dorsal portion of the main piece of the aedeagus furked, with two-three strong, finger-like projections ( Figs. 42 View FIGURES 42 b-d), and a single, flagellum-like, mobile lobe. Species from Balkans and SE Europe only ( Fig. 43 View FIGURE 43 ).................... 33
32 (31) Distal dorsal portion of the main piece of the aedeagus not furked, without finger-like projections................ 37
33 (34) Species from Pannonian areas ( Fig. 43 View FIGURE 43 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Fig. 42c View FIGURES 42 )................. 72. hungarica Rey 1884 View in CoL
34 (33) Species from Balkans ( Fig. 43 View FIGURE 43 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Figs. 42b, d View FIGURES 42 )....................................... 35
35 (36) Species from NE Balkans ( Croatia, Bosnia, Serbia, Montenegro) ( Fig. 43 View FIGURE 43 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Fig. 42b View FIGURES 42 )................................................................................... 71. bosnica Apfelbeck 1909 View in CoL
36 (35) Species from SE Balkans ( Bulgaria, NE Greece) ( Fig. 43 View FIGURE 43 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Fig. 42d View FIGURES 42 )................................................................................................... 73. leonhardi Breit 1916 View in CoL
37 (38) Distal portion of the main piece of the aedeagus lacking both mobile lobe and flagellum ( Figs. 46 d View FIGURES 46 , f-h); 4 distinct aedeagal setae present................................................................................. 39
38 (37) Distal portion of the main piece of the aedeagus bearing both mobile lobe and flagellum, or the mobile lobe only (e.g., Figs. 18d–h View FIGURES 18 , 48f–l View FIGURES 48 and 32b–g View FIGURES 32 ); aedeagal setae 2 to 5..................................................... 45
39 (40) Distal ventral portion of the main piece of the aedeagus in lateral view with a distinct, more or less deep U-shaped emargination ( Figs. 46g –h View FIGURES 46 ). Species from NE Iberian Peninsula ( Fig. 47 View FIGURE 47 )......................................... 41
40 (39) Distal ventral portion of the main piece of the aedeagus in lateral view without emargination ( Figs. 46d, f View FIGURES 46 ). Species from France and NW Italy ( Fig. 47 View FIGURE 47 )....................................................................... 43
41 (42) Distal ventral portion of the main piece of the aedeagus in lateral view with a much deeper U-shaped emargination ( Fig. 46h View FIGURES 46 ). Catalonia ( Fig. 47 View FIGURE 47 )................................. 83. catalonica Fresneda, Aguilera & Hernando 1994 View in CoL
42 (41) Distal ventral portion of the main piece of the aedeagus in lateral view with a much shallower U-shaped emargination ( Fig. 46g View FIGURES 46 ). eastern Spanish Pyrenees ( Fig. 47 View FIGURE 47 )..................................... 82. bitruncata d’Orchymont 1934 View in CoL
43 (44) Distal dorsal portion of the main piece of the aedeagus in lateral view with two distinct contiguous widely U-shaped emarginations ( Fig. 46d View FIGURES 46 ). SE France and NW Italy ( Fig. 47 View FIGURE 47 )............................. 79. bensae Ganglbauer 1901 View in CoL
44 (43) Distal dorsal portion of the main piece of the aedeagus in lateral view markedly enlarged and without emarginations ( Fig. 46f View FIGURES 46 ). Central E France (Mont Pilat and neighbouring areas; fig. 47)................ 81. bicuspidata Ganglbauer 1901 View in CoL
45 (46) Distal portion of the main piece of the aedeagus bearing only the mobile lobe, (the latter never crowning with a flagellum; Figs. 12f View FIGURES 12 , 24c–l View FIGURES 24 , 26c–m View FIGURES 26 , 28b–d View FIGURES 28 , 30c–e View FIGURES 30 , 32b–g View FIGURES 32 , 36c–f View FIGURES 36 and 44d–f View FIGURES 44 ), or bearing a more or less developed flagellum-like mobile lobe ( Figs. 38f View FIGURES 38 and 48f–l View FIGURES 48 ); aedeagal setae 3 to 5.................................................. 47
46 (45) Distal portion of the main piece of the aedeagus bearing a mobile lobe crowning with a more or less developed flagellum ( Figs. 14b–d View FIGURES 14 , 16c–h View FIGURES 16 , 18d–h View FIGURES 18 , 20b–e View FIGURES 20 , 22d–f View FIGURES 22 , 34c–e View FIGURES 34 , 38d–e View FIGURES 38 and 44d–f View FIGURES 44 ); aedeagal setae 2 to 4..................... 124
47 (48) Distal portion of the main piece of the aedeagus bearing a mobile lobe not flagellum-like; male genitalia as figured (12f, 24c–l, 26c–m, 28b–d, 30c–e, 32b–g, 36c–f and 44d–f)................................................... 49
48 (47) Distal portion of the main piece of the aedeagus bearing a more or less developed flagellum-like mobile lobe. Male genitalia as figured ( Figs. 38f View FIGURES 38 and 48f–l View FIGURES 48 )................................................................... 116
49 (50) Basal (proximal) tooth of the main piece of the aedeagus bearing a distinct, rather long seta ( Figs. 44 d–f View FIGURES 44 ); 5 aedeagal setae. Species from S Spain ( Fig. 45 View FIGURE 45 )................................................................. 51
50 (49) Basal (proximal) tooth of the main piece of the aedeagus without setae; 3 to 4 aedeagal setae.................... 55
51 (52) Distal half of the main piece of the aedeagus in lateral view much narrower than in following two species ( Fig. 44d View FIGURES 44 ). Granada province (Sierra Nevada) ( Fig. 45 View FIGURE 45 )........................... 74. tatii Sáinz-Cantero & Alba-Tercedor 1989 View in CoL
52 (51) Distal half of the main piece of the aedeagus in lateral view much wider than in the preceding species ( Figs. 44e, f View FIGURES 44 ). Jaen and Cadiz provinces ( Fig. 45 View FIGURE 45 )....................................................................... 53
53 (54) Mesal portion of the main piece of the aedeagus in lateral view much wider ( Fig. 44f View FIGURES 44 ). Cadiz province ( Fig. 45 View FIGURE 45 )............................................................................ 76. gaditana Lagar& Fresneda 1990 View in CoL
54 (53) Mesal portion of the main piece of the aedeagus in lateral view distinctly narrower ( Fig. 44e View FIGURES 44 ). Jaen province ( Fig. 45 View FIGURE 45 ) ................................................................... 75. manfredjaechi Delgado & Soler 1991 View in CoL
55 (56) Body size not exceeding 1.8 mm ( Fig. 12b View FIGURES 12 ); body reddish-brown even in not-teneral specimens. Distal dorsal portion of the main piece of the aedeagus in lateral view widely enlarged, deeply emarginated, and apically truncate ( Fig. 12f View FIGURES 12 ); 4 aedeagal setae. W Iberian Peninsula ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 )...................................... 8. lusitana Berthélemy 1977 View in CoL
56 (55) Body size usually markedly exceeding 1.8 mm. 3 or 4 aedeagal setae. Differently shaped main piece of the aedeagus..... ............................................................................................... 57
57 (58) 4 aedeagal setae, subequal in length ( Figs. 36c–f View FIGURES 36 ). Body always reddish to orange-yellowish, even in not-teneral specimens. Species from peninsular Italy and SE France ( Fig. 37 View FIGURE 37 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Figs. 36c–f View FIGURES 36 )............... 59
58 (57) 3 aedeagal setae subequal in length (fourth one, if present, much shorter and hardly distinct). Body never reddish to orange-yellowish in not-teneral specimens. Male genitalia differently shaped................................. 65
59 (60) Metatibiae simple, without any dilatation distally ( Fig. 36a View FIGURES 36 ). Main piece of the aedeagus as figured, markedly dilated in lateral view, and peculiarly large- sized (around 750µm; fig. 36c). SE France, NW Italy ( Fig. 37 View FIGURE 37 )........................................................................................ 60. decolor Sainte-Claire Deville 1903 View in CoL
60 (59) Metatibiae moderately but distinctly dilated at distal third ( Fig. 36b View FIGURES 36 ; Appendix 3f). Main piece of the aedeagus as figured, much less dilated in lateral view, and of relatively normal size (around 580–650µm; Figs. 36d–f View FIGURES 36 )................ 61
61 (62) Main piece of the aedeagus as figured, mesal portion slender and less abruptly sinuate in lateral view ( Fig. 36e View FIGURES 36 ). Central and eastern Tosco-Emiliano Apennine ( Fig. 37 View FIGURE 37 )................................... 63. bononiensis Chiesa 1959 View in CoL
62 (61) Main piece of the aedeagus as figured, mesal portion wider and more abruptly sinuate in lateral view ( Figs. 36d, f View FIGURES 36 )... 63
63 (64) Main piece of the aedeagus in lateral view with prebasal emargination narrower, and delimited by a markedly distinct right angle ( Fig. 36f View FIGURES 36 ). Central and southern Apennines ( Fig. 37 View FIGURE 37 )............................... 61. solarii Pretner 1930 View in CoL
64 (63) Main piece of the aedeagus in lateral view with prebasal emargination wider, sloping regularly distad ( Fig. 36d View FIGURES 36 ). SE France, NW Italy ( Fig. 37 View FIGURE 37 )........................................... 62. occitana (Audisio & De Biase 1995)
65 (66) Distal mobile lobe of the aedeagus not spiral-shaped ( Figs. 24c–l View FIGURES 24 ). 3 aedeagal setae subequal in length............. 67
66 (65) Distal mobile lobe of the aedeagus spiral-shaped ( Figs. 26c–m View FIGURES 26 , 28b–d View FIGURES 28 , 30c–e View FIGURES 30 and 32b–g View FIGURES 32 ). 3 aedeagal setae subequal in length, in some species with an additional minute peg.................................................... 79
67 (68) Distal portion of the aedeagal main piece in lateral view with obliquely truncate apex and dorsal edge bearing two markedly distinct acute projections ( Fig. 24l View FIGURES 24 ). Elytral margins peculiarly widely explanate ( Fig. 24b View FIGURES 24 ). N Turkey (Central Pontic Chain; fig. 25)............................................................... 36. crepidoptera Jäch 1992 View in CoL
68 (67) Distal portion of the aedeagal main piece in lateral view more or less regularly sloping, apex not abruptly truncate as above, dorsal edge without projections ( Figs. 24c–h View FIGURES 24 ). Elytral margins more or less explanate ( Fig. 24a View FIGURES 24 )............. 69
69 (70) Species from Thassos and Samothraki Islands (E Greece; fig. 25). Male genitalia as figured ( Figs. 24f, h View FIGURES 24 )........... 71
70 (69) Species from mainland Europe and Euro-Anatolian areas ( Fig. 25 View FIGURE 25 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Figs. 24c–e, g View FIGURES 24 )........ 73
71 (72) Species from Samothraki Island (E Greece; fig. 25). Size of aedeagal main piece smaller than 500µm. Dorsal margin of apical half of the main piece entirely evenly convex, bearing a distinct hump near the middle ( Fig. 24h View FIGURES 24 )................................................................................................. 35. nike Jäch 1995 View in CoL
72 (71) Species from Thassos Island (E Greece; fig. 25). Size of aedeagal main piece larger than 500µm. Dorsal margin of apical half of the main piece nearly straight, without distinct hump near the middle ( Fig. 24f View FIGURES 24 )....... 33. elisabethae Jäch 1992 View in CoL
73 (74) Species from Anatolian Peninsula and Caucasian areas ( Fig. 25 View FIGURE 25 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Figs. 24e,g View FIGURES 24 )............. 75
74 (73) Species from mainland Europe ( Fig. 25 View FIGURE 25 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Figs. 25c–d View FIGURE 25 )............................... 77
75 (76) Elytral margins much more narrowly flattened ( Fig. 24a View FIGURES 24 ). Dorsal margin of the main piece of the aedeagus usually gently emarginate in apical tenth, but without distinct hump near apical sixth ( Fig. 24g View FIGURES 24 ). Turkey and Azerbaijan ( Fig. 25 View FIGURE 25 )................................................................................ 34. anatolica Janssens 1963 View in CoL
76 (75) Elytral margins nearly as widely flattened and explanate as in Fig. 24 b View FIGURES 24 . Male genitalia as figured ( Fig. 24e View FIGURES 24 ). N Turkey (Bolu province; fig. 25)........................................................ 32. graciloides (Jäch 1988)
77 (78) Predistal portion of dorsal edge of the aedeagal main piece in lateral view almost straight, without emargination; distal apex narrower than in the following species ( Fig. 24c View FIGURES 24 ). Mainland Europe, excluding Iberian Peninsula ( Fig. 25 View FIGURE 25 )................................................................................... 30. gracilis Germar 1824 View in CoL
78 (77) Predistal portion of dorsal edge of the aedeagal main piece in lateral view, with a distinct gently curved emargination; distal apex wider than in the preceding species ( Fig. 24d View FIGURES 24 ). Iberian Peninsula ( Fig. 25 View FIGURE 25 )........................................................................... 31. gracilidelphis Trizzino, Valladares, Garrido & Audisio 2012 View in CoL
79 (80) Distal portion of the aedeagal mobile lobe peculiarly large, distinctly wider than the phallobase; distal apex of the aedeagal main piece in lateral view sharply and evenly triangular ( Figs. 30e View FIGURES 30 and 32b–g View FIGURES 32 ). 3 aedeagal setae, additional minute peg always absent.................................................................................... 81
80 (79) Distal portion of the aedeagal mobile lobe smaller and narrower, never distinctly wider than the phallobase ( Figs. 26d–m View FIGURES 26 , 28b–d View FIGURES 28 and 30c–d View FIGURES 30 ); if nearly so large, then distal apex not triangular ( Fig. 26c View FIGURES 26 ). 3 aedeagal setae, additional minute peg always absent.................................................................................... 95
81 (82) Species from Anatolian Peninsula and Lesbos Island ( Fig. 33 View FIGURE 33 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Figs. 32 c–e View FIGURES 32 )............. 83
82 (81) Species from mainland Europe ( Fig. 33 View FIGURE 33 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Figs. 32 f–h View FIGURES 32 ).............................. 87
83 (84) Predistal portion of dorsal edge of the aedeagal main piece in lateral view with a markedly distinct projection ( Fig. 32e View FIGURES 32 ). W Turkey and Lesbos Island ( Fig. 33 View FIGURE 33 )............................................ 53. cata d’Orchymont 1943 View in CoL
84 (83) Predistal portion of dorsal edge of the aedeagal main piece in lateral view without a markedly distinct projection ( Figs. 32c–d View FIGURES 32 ). Species from N and S Turkey ( Fig. 33 View FIGURE 33 ).......................................................... 85
85 (86) Distal half of dorsal edge of the aedeagal main piece in lateral view almost straight ( Fig. 32d View FIGURES 32 ). N and E Turkey ( Fig. 33 View FIGURE 33 ).............................................................................. 52. integra Pretner 1931 View in CoL
86 (85) Distal half of dorsal edge of the aedeagal main piece in lateral view markedly more convex ( Fig. 32c View FIGURES 32 ). S Turkey ( Fig. 33 View FIGURE 33 )............................................................ 50. akbesiana Audisio, De Biase & Jäch 1993 View in CoL
87 (88) Species from Peloponnesus (S Greece; Figs. 31 View FIGURE 31 and 33 View FIGURE 33 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Figs. 30e View FIGURES 30 and 32g View FIGURES 32 ).............. 89
88 (89) Species from mainland Europe, excluding Peloponnesus ( Fig. 33 View FIGURE 33 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Figs. 32b, f, h View FIGURES 32 )......... 91
89 (90) Proximal portion of the distal half of the aedeagal main piece in lateral view delimited by a blunt, nearly right angle ( Fig. 30e View FIGURES 30 ). S Peloponnesus (Taygethos Mts.; fig. 31).......................................... 49. pelops Jäch 1995 View in CoL
90 (89) Proximal portion of the distal half of the aedeagal main piece in lateral view regularly sloping, not delimited by a distinct angle ( Fig. 32g View FIGURES 32 ). Whole Peloponnesus ( Fig. 33 View FIGURE 33 )..................... 55. christinae Audisio De Biase & Jäch 1996 View in CoL
91 (92) Species from Iberian Peninsula ( Fig. 33 View FIGURE 33 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Fig. 32h View FIGURES 32 )....... 56. exasperata d’Orchymont 1935 View in CoL
92 (91) Species from mainland Europe excluding Iberian Peninsula ( Fig. 33 View FIGURE 33 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Figs. 32b, f View FIGURES 32 )........ 93
93 (94) Size of aedeagal main piece smaller, ranging around 450µm ( Fig. 32f View FIGURES 32 ). Balkans, Romania and European Turkey ( Fig. 33 View FIGURE 33 )........................................................................ 54. phallica d’Orchymont 1930 View in CoL
94 (93) Size of aedeagal main piece larger, ranging around 550µm ( Fig. 32b View FIGURES 32 ). N and Central E Europe, southwards to N Greece ( Fig. 33 View FIGURE 33 )................................................................... 51. excisa Kiesenwetter 1849 View in CoL
95 (96) Distal half of the aedeagal main piece in lateral view roughly plough-shaped, being delimited proximally by a more or less markedly distinct angle ( Figs. 28b–d View FIGURES 28 ). 3 aedeagal setae subequal in length, without additional minute peg.......... 97
96 (95) Distal half of the aedeagal main piece in lateral view not plough-shaped, not delimited proximally by a markedly distinct angle ( Figs. 26c–m View FIGURES 26 ). 3 aedeagal setae subequal in length, in some species with an additional minute peg........... 100
97 (98) Distal portion of the aedeagal mobile lobe smaller, distinctly truncate, and peculiarly parallelepiped-shaped ( Fig. 28d View FIGURES 28 ). NE Italy (Treviso province; fig. 29).................................................. 46. tarvisina (Ferro 1992)
98 (97) Distal portion of the aedeagal mobile lobe larger, and not parallelepiped-shaped ( Figs. 28b–c View FIGURES 28 ). Central Europe and N Balkans ( Fig. 29 View FIGURE 29 )................................................................................... 99
99 (100) Angle proximally delimiting the plough-shaped distal half of the aedeagal main piece sharp and almost right ( Fig. 28b View FIGURES 28 ). N Balkans ( Fig. 29 View FIGURE 29 )........................................................ 44. dalmatina Ganglbauer 1901 View in CoL
100 (99) Angle proximally delimiting the plough-shaped distal half of the aedeagal main piece much more blunt and rounded ( Fig. 28c View FIGURES 28 ). Central and E Europe ( Fig. 29 View FIGURE 29 )........................................... 45. belgica d’Orchymont 1930 View in CoL
101 (102) Mesotibiae slightly enlarged in distal half ( Fig. 26b View FIGURES 26 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Fig. 26h View FIGURES 26 ). Iberian Peninsula ( Fig. 27 View FIGURE 27 )............................................................................ 41. hispanica Ganglbauer 1901 View in CoL
102 (101) Mesotibiae simple, not enlarged in distal half ( Figs. 26a View FIGURES 26 and 30a View FIGURES 30 ). Male genitalia differently shaped............... 103
103 (104) Species from N Iberian Peninsula and Pyrenees Mts. ( Fig. 27 View FIGURE 27 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Figs. 26a, f–g View FIGURES 26 )........... 105
104 (103) Species from Central and E Europe, Italy and Greece ( Figs. 27 View FIGURE 27 and 31 View FIGURE 31 )...................................... 108
105 (106) Distal portion of the aedeagal mobile lobe larger, nearly as wide as the phallobase ( Fig. 26c View FIGURES 26 ). Pyrenees ( Fig. 27 View FIGURE 27 )..................................................................................... 38. emarginata Rey 1885 View in CoL
106 (105) Distal portion of the aedeagal mobile lobe smaller, much narrower than the phallobase ( Figs. 26 f–g View FIGURES 26 )............. 107
107 (108) Pre-apical dorsal outline of aedeagal main piece in lateral view bearing a peculiar and clearly visible, small V-shaped incision ( Fig. 26f View FIGURES 26 ). E Pyrenees ( Fig. 27 View FIGURE 27 ).................................... 39. diazi Trizzino, Jäch & Ribera 2011 View in CoL
108 (107) Pre-apical dorsal side of aedeagal main piece in lateral view rounded, and without clearly visible small V-shaped incision ( Fig. 26g View FIGURES 26 ). N Iberian System ( Fig. 27 View FIGURE 27 ).............................. 40. fosterorum Trizzino, Jäch & Ribera 2011 View in CoL
109 (110) Species from Italy, excluding Carnian Alps ( Figs. 27 View FIGURE 27 and 31 View FIGURE 31 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Figs. 26d View FIGURES 26 and 30c View FIGURES 30 )......... 111
110 (109) Species from Central and E Europe, Carnian Alps included, N Balkans and Greece ( Figs. 27 View FIGURE 27 and 31 View FIGURE 31 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Figs. 26l–m View FIGURES 26 and 30d View FIGURES 30 )........................................................................ 113
111 (112) Aedeagal main piece longer (ranging around 575µm) but, in lateral view, distinctly narrower than in the following species ( Fig. 30c View FIGURES 30 ). Elytral margins more widely flattened than in the following species ( Fig. 30a View FIGURES 30 ). Central E Italy ( Fig. 31 View FIGURE 31 )................................................................................... 47. samnitica Fiori 1904 View in CoL
112 (111) Aedeagal main piece shorter (ranging around 530µm) but, in lateral view, distinctly wider than in the preceding species ( Fig. 26d View FIGURES 26 ). Elytral margins less widely flattened than in the preceding species ( Fig. 26a View FIGURES 26 ). N Italy ( Fig. 27 View FIGURE 27 )..................................................................................... 37. larissae Jäch & Díaz 2000 View in CoL
113 (114) Species from NE Greece (Pangaeon Mt.; fig. 31). Male genitalia as figured ( Fig. 30d View FIGURES 30 ). Elytral margins more widely flattened than in the following two species (as in fig. 30a).................................... 48. pangaei Jäch 1992 View in CoL
114 (113) Species from Central and E Europe, including Carnian Alps, and N Balkans ( Fig. 27 View FIGURE 27 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Figs. 26l–m View FIGURES 26 ). Elytral margins less widely flattened than in the preceding species (as in fig. 26a)....................... 115
115 (116) Aedeagal apex in lateral view minutely but distinctly hook-shaped ( Fig. 26m View FIGURES 26 ). Carnian Alps, Central Europe and N Balkans ( Fig. 27 View FIGURE 27 )................................................................ 43. alpicola Pretner 1931 View in CoL
116 (115) Aedeagal apex in lateral view not at all hook-shaped ( Fig. 26l View FIGURES 26 ). Central and E Europe, and N Balkans ( Fig. 27 View FIGURE 27 )................................................................................... 42. saga d’Orchymont 1930 View in CoL
117 (118) Species from Austria, Friuli Venezia Giulia and Slovenia ( Fig. 39 View FIGURE 39 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Fig. 38f View FIGURES 38 ).......................................................................................... 66. muelleri Pretner 1931 View in CoL
118 (117) Species from Peninsular Italy (excluding Friuli Venezia Giulia) and Central E and SE France ( Fig. 49 View FIGURE 49 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Figs. 48f–l View FIGURES 48 )............................................................................. 119
119 (120) Distal half of the aedeagal main piece in lateral view abruptly enlarged ( Figs. 48f–g View FIGURES 48 ). Species from Italian Peninsula and SE France ( Fig. 49 View FIGURE 49 )............................................................................... 121
120 (119) Distal half of the aedeagal main piece in lateral view not enlarged and much narrower ( Figs. 48h–l View FIGURES 48 ). Species from NW Italy and Central E France ( Fig. 49 View FIGURE 49 )................................................................. 123
121 (122) Mesal portion of the aedeagal main piece in lateral view with two distinct gibbose projections (one ventral and one dorsal; fig. 48g). Pronotum distinctly wider than in the following species ( Fig. 48c View FIGURES 48 ). Species from Tosco-Emiliano Apennine ( Fig. 49 View FIGURE 49 )............................................................................ 86. plumipes Rey 1886 View in CoL
122 (121) Mesal portion of the aedeagal main piece in lateral view without distinct gibbose projections ( Fig. 48f View FIGURES 48 ). Pronotum distinctly narrower than in the preceding species ( Fig. 48b View FIGURES 48 ). Species from SE France and Italian Peninsula ( Fig. 49 View FIGURE 49 )................................................................................... 85. heterogyna Bedel 1898 View in CoL
123 (124) Species from Central E France ( Fig. 49 View FIGURE 49 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Fig. 48l View FIGURES 48 )....... 88. producta Mulsant & Rey 1852 View in CoL
124 (123) Species from NW Italy ( Fig. 49 View FIGURE 49 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Fig. 48h View FIGURES 48 ).................. 87. discreta Ganglbauer 1904 View in CoL
125 (126) Species from Corsica and Sardinia ( Fig. 35 View FIGURE 35 ). Male genitalia with both distal mobile lobe and associated flagellum peculiarly short and reduced ( Figs. 34c–e View FIGURES 34 ). Body always reddish to orange-yellowish, even in not-teneral specimens..... 127
126 (125) Species outside Corsica and Sardinia. Male genitalia with much developed distal mobile lobe and/or associated flagellum. Body variably coloured........................................................................... 131
127 (128) Male protibiae more robust and with slightly more curved inner edges ( Fig. 34b View FIGURES 34 ). Male metatibiae slightly more distinctly dilated in their distal half ( Fig. 34b View FIGURES 34 ). Dorsal outline of the main piece of aedeagus in lateral view with very wide and much shallower arcuate emargination at distal third, and, a little more distad than the middle, only with a weak angulate projection ( Fig. 34d View FIGURES 34 ). SW Sardinia ( Fig. 35 View FIGURE 35 )........................... 58. rosannae Audisio, Trizzino & De Biase 2009 View in CoL
128 (127) Male protibiae weaker and with nearly straight inner edges ( Fig. 34a View FIGURES 34 ). Male metatibiae slightly more weakly dilated in their distal half ( Fig. 34a View FIGURES 34 ). Dorsal outline of the main piece of aedeagus in lateral view with deeper and widely U-shaped emargination at distal third, and, a little more distad than the middle, with a marked gibbose projection ( Figs. 34c, e View FIGURES 34 ). Corsica, Central and northern Sardinia ( Fig. 35 View FIGURE 35 )............................................................ 129
129 (130) Middle portion of the main piece of the aedeagus in lateral view thicker, 0.31–0.32 times as thick as the aedeagal main piece length, and dorsal outline with shallower and more widely U-shaped emargination at distal third ( Fig. 34e View FIGURES 34 ). Corsica ( Fig. 35 View FIGURE 35 )...................................................................... 59. evanescens Rey 1884 View in CoL
130 (129) Middle portion of the main piece of aedeagus in lateral view thinner, 0.25–0.26 times as thick as the aedeagal main piece length, and dorsal outline with deeper and more narrowly U-shaped emargination at distal third ( Fig. 34c View FIGURES 34 ). Central and northern Sardinia ( Fig. 35 View FIGURE 35 )....................................................... 57. tyrrhena Binaghi 1961
131 (132) Species from S Balkans ( Fig. 23 View FIGURE 23 ). 3 or 4 aedeagal setae; male genitalia as figured ( Figs. 22d–f View FIGURES 22 )................... 133
132 (131) Species outside S Balkans. 4 aedeagal setae............................................................ 137
133 (134) Apex of aedeagal main piece in lateral view not truncate, narrowly rounded; 4 aedeagal setae; flagellum hugely long and thin, minutely spiralized, and, when extended, exceeding several times the body length ( Fig. 22f View FIGURES 22 ). Body always reddish to orange-yellowish, even in not-teneral specimens. W Greece and N Peloponnesus ( Fig. 23 View FIGURE 23 )...... 29. epeirosi Ferro 1985 View in CoL
134 (133) Apex of aedeagal main piece in lateral view obliquely truncate; 3 aedeagal setae; flagellum much shorter than in the preceding species ( Figs. 22d–e View FIGURES 22 ). Body dark brown to blackish at least in not-teneral specimens..................... 135
135 (136) Distal third of the aedeagal main piece in lateral view wider than in the following species; flagellum shorter ( Fig. 22d View FIGURES 22 ; male genitalia peculiarly black). Albania, Montenegro, Macedonia, and Greece including N Peloponnesus ( Fig. 23 View FIGURE 23 )............................................................................. 27. vedrasi d’Orchymont 1931 View in CoL
136 (135) Distal third of the aedeagal main piece in lateral view narrower than in the preceding species; flagellum longer ( Fig. 22e View FIGURES 22 ; male genitalia brown). Peloponnesus ( Fig. 23 View FIGURE 23 ).......................... 28. jaechiana ( Audisio & De Biase 1990)
137 (138) Species from mainliand Europe eastwards to Carpathian Mts. ( Fig. 39 View FIGURE 39 )...................................... 139
138 (137) Species from circum-Pontic and Caucasian areas, and near East, including Greek E Ionian islands ( Figs. 15 View FIGURE 15 , 17 View FIGURE 17 , 19 View FIGURE 19 and 21 View FIGURE 21 )............................................................................................... 141
139 (140) Elytral margins more widely flattened than in the following species ( Fig. 38b View FIGURES 38 ). Body entirely dark brown to blackish in in not-teneral specimens. Male genitalia as figured ( Fig. 38e View FIGURES 38 ). Venezia Giulia, and Istria ( Fig. 39 View FIGURE 39 )............................................................................................ 65. czernohorskyi J. Müller 1911 View in CoL
140 (139) Elytral margins markedly narrower than in the preceding species ( Fig. 38a View FIGURES 38 ). Body dark brown to blackish, with almost always reddish elytra even in not-teneral specimens. Male genitalia as figured ( Fig. 38d View FIGURES 38 ). Mainland Europe, eastwards to Carpathian Mts. ( Fig. 39 View FIGURE 39 )........................................................... 64. truncata Rey 1885 View in CoL
141 (142) Species from Middle East ( Lebanon Mts.; fig. 19). Male genitalia as figured ( Figs. 18f–g View FIGURES 18 )...................... 143
142 (141) Species from Turkey, Caucasian region, Iran and Greek E Ionian islands.................................... 145
143 (144) Ventral outline of the apical half of aedeagal main piece in lateral view showing a wide and deeper arcuate emargination ( Fig. 18f View FIGURES 18 )...................................................... 20. berthelemyiana Jäch, Díaz & Dia 2006
144 (143) Ventral edge of the apical half of aedeagal main piece in lateral view showing a markedly shallower arcuate emargination ( Fig. 18g View FIGURES 18 )............................................................ 21. orthosia Jäch, Díaz & Dia 2006 View in CoL
145 (146) Ratio maximum pronotal width/ posterior pronotal base width> 1.7 ( Fig. 18b View FIGURES 18 ). Elytral margins peculiarly widely flattened and parallel-sided ( Fig. 18b View FIGURES 18 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Fig. 18e View FIGURES 18 ). NW Iran (Fars region, Zagros Mts.; fig. 19)........................................................................... 19. hosseinieorum Bilton & Jäch 1998 View in CoL 146 (145) Ratio maximum pronotal width/ posterior pronotal base width <1.4 ( Figs. 14a View FIGURES 14 , 16a–b View FIGURES 16 , 18a View FIGURES 18 and 20a View FIGURES 20 ). Elytral margins much less widely flattened and parallel-sided than in preceding species ( Figs. 14a View FIGURES 14 , 16a–b View FIGURES 16 , 18a View FIGURES 18 and 20a View FIGURES 20 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Figs. 14 b–d View FIGURES 14 , 16c–h View FIGURES 16 , 18d, h View FIGURES 18 and 20b–e View FIGURES 20 )............................................................... 147
147 (148) Aedeagal flagellum peculiarly reduced ( Figs. 20b–e View FIGURES 20 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Figs. 20b–e View FIGURES 20 ). Species from Caucasian areas and Crimea ( Fig. 21 View FIGURE 21 )......................................................................... 149
148 (147) Aedeagal flagellum much longer and developed. Male genitalia as figured ( Figs. 14b–d View FIGURES 14 , 16c–h View FIGURES 16 and 18d, h View FIGURES 18 ). Species from Turkey, Greek E Ionian islands and SW Caucasian areas ( Fig. 21 View FIGURE 21 ).......................................... 155
149 (150) Distal portion of the aedeagal mobile lobe (around base of flagellum) wider and funnel-shaped ( Figs. 20d–e View FIGURES 20 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Figs. 20d–e View FIGURES 20 ). Species from NW Caucasus ( Fig. 21 View FIGURE 21 ).......................................... 151
150 (149) Distal portion of the aedeagal mobile lobe (around base of flagellum) much narrower and subcylindrical ( Figs. 20b–c View FIGURES 20 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Figs. 20b–c View FIGURES 20 ). Species from Caucasus ( Fig. 21 View FIGURE 21 ).................................... 153
151 (152) Proximal half of aedeagal main piece in lateral view more abruptly curved, with middle portion of the main piece of the aedeagus in lateral view markedly wider than in the following species ( Fig. 20e View FIGURES 20 ). NW Caucasus (Novorossiysk area, SW Krasnodar region; fig. 21).................................................... 26. prokini Jäch & Díaz 2006 View in CoL
152 (151) Proximal half of aedeagal main piece in lateral view more widely curved, with middle portion of the main piece of the aedeagus in lateral view markedly narrower than in the following species ( Fig. 20d View FIGURES 20 ). NW Caucasus (S Krasnodar region; fig. 21)............................................................ 25. krasnodarensis Jäch & Díaz 2006 View in CoL
153 (154) Mesotibial expansion and ist denticles and spines slightly less strongly developed than in the following species ( Fig. 20a View FIGURES 20 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Fig. 20b View FIGURES 20 ). Most of Caucasian areas, excluding NW ( Fig. 21 View FIGURE 21 ).... 23. planata Kiesnwetter 1849 View in CoL
154 (153) Mesotibial expansion and ist denticles and spines slightly more strongly developed than in the preceding species. Male genitalia as figured ( Fig. 20c View FIGURES 20 ). NW Caucasus (S Krasnodar region; fig. 21)........ 24. solodovnikovi Jäch & Díaz 2006 View in CoL
155 (156) Aedeagal main piece smaller (shorter than 400µm); male genitalia as figured ( Figs. 14b–d View FIGURES 14 ). Body lenght <1.8 mm ( Fig. 14a View FIGURES 14 ). Species from W Turkey and Lesbos Island ( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 15 )................................................ 157
156 (155) Aedeagal main piece larger (longer than 480µm); male genitalia as figured ( Figs. 16c–h View FIGURES 16 and 18d, h View FIGURES 18 ). Body lenght> 1.8 mm ( Figs. 16a–b View FIGURES 16 and 18a View FIGURES 18 ). Species from Asiatic Turkey, Caucasian areas and NW Iran ( Figs. 17 View FIGURE 17 and 19 View FIGURE 19 )............... 161
157 (158) Species from Lesbos Island ( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 15 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Fig. 14d View FIGURES 14 ); distal portion of the aedeagal main piece narrower than in the two following species............................................ 11. gynaephila Jäch 1997 View in CoL
158 (157) Species from mainland W Turkey ( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 15 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Figs. 14b–c View FIGURES 14 ); distal portion of the aedeagal main piece wider than in the preceding species............................................................. 159
159 (160) Predistal portion of aedeagal main piece in lateral view with a more deeply arcuate emargination on ventral outline, and without marked incision on dorsal outline ( Fig. 14b View FIGURES 14 ). NW Turkey (Istanbul and Bolu provinces; fig. 15)....................................................................................... 9. scitula d’Orchymont 1943 View in CoL
160 (159) Predistal portion of aedeagal main piece in lateral view with a less deeply arcuate emargination on ventral outline, and with a marked incision on dorsal outline ( Fig. 14c View FIGURES 14 ). W Turkey (Izmir province; fig. 15)........... 10. magnessa Jäch 1997 View in CoL
161 (162) Elytral lateral outline distinctly more parallel-sided, even close to their distal apex ( Fig. 16b View FIGURES 16 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Figs. 16d–e View FIGURES 16 ). Species from N Turkey (Central-W Portion of Pontic Chain; fig. 17)........................... 163
162 (161) Elytral lateral outline less parallel-sided, more convergent distally ( Figs. 16a View FIGURES 16 and 18a View FIGURES 18 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Figs. 16c, f–h View FIGURES 16 and 18d, h View FIGURES 18 ). Species from Asiatic Turkey, Caucasian areas and NW Iran ( Figs. 17 View FIGURE 17 and 19 View FIGURE 19 ).................... 165
163 (164) Dorsal outline of apical half of aedeagal main piece in lateral view more straight ( Fig. 16e View FIGURES 16 ). Species from Bartin to Sinop provinces ( Fig. 17 View FIGURE 17 ).................................................................. 14. sinope Jäch 1992 View in CoL
164 (163) Dorsal outline of apical half of aedeagal main piece in lateral view more sloping ( Fig. 16d View FIGURES 16 ). Species from Bartin and Bolu provinces ( Fig. 17 View FIGURE 17 )......................................................... 13. septemlacuum Jäch 1992 View in CoL
165 (166) Distal apex of the aedeagal main piece in lateral view peculiarly sickle-shaped; male genitalia as figured ( Fig. 16c View FIGURES 16 ). NE Turkey and Georgia ( Fig. 17 View FIGURE 17 ).................................................... 12. caucasica Kuwert 1888 View in CoL
166 (165) Distal apex of the aedeagal main piece in lateral view not sickle-shaped; male genitalia as figured ( Figs. 16f–h View FIGURES 16 and 18d, h View FIGURES 18 ). Asiatic Turkey and NW Iran ( Figs. 17 View FIGURE 17 and 19 View FIGURE 19 )......................................................... 167
167 (168) Ventral outline of the aedeagal main piece in lateral view peculiarly undulate ( Fig. 16h View FIGURES 16 ). Body length <2.0 mm. S and SE Turkey ( Fig. 17 View FIGURE 17 ).............................................................. 17. nilguenae (Jäch 1988)
168 (167) Ventral outline of the aedeagal main piece in lateral view more or less arcuate but not multi-undulate ( Figs. 16f–g View FIGURES 16 and 18d, h View FIGURES 18 ). Body length <2.0 mm. S and SE Turkey ( Fig. 17 View FIGURE 17 )................................................... 169
169 (170) Distal apex of the aedeagal main piece in lateral view slightly bilobed ( Figs. 16f–g View FIGURES 16 ). Species from W and E Asiatic Turkey ( Fig. 17 View FIGURE 17 )........................................................................................ 171
170 (169) Distal apex of the aedeagal main piece in lateral view obtusely rounded, not bilobed ( Figs. 18d, h View FIGURES 18 ). Species from NE and S Asiatic Turkey, and Iran ( Fig. 19 View FIGURE 19 ).................................................................... 173
171 (172) Species from W Turkey (Bursa province; fig. 17). Male genitalia as figured ( Fig. 16f View FIGURES 16 )... 15. plastica d’Orchymont 1943
172 (171) Species from E Turkey ( Fig. 17 View FIGURE 17 ). Male genitalia as figured ( Fig. 16g View FIGURES 16 )................. 16. khnzoriani Janssens 1968 View in CoL
173 (174) Species from S and SE Turkey, and NW Iran ( Fig. 19 View FIGURE 19 ). Aedeagal flagellum distinctly longer than in the following species. Male genitalia as figured ( Fig. 18h View FIGURES 18 ). Elytra more parallel-sided towards distal apex (nearly as in fig. 18c)....................................................................................... 22. fontiscarsavii (Jäch 1988)
174 (173) Species from NE Turkey ( Fig. 19 View FIGURE 19 ). Aedeagal flagellum distinctly shorter than in the preceding species. Male genitalia as figured ( Fig. 18d View FIGURES 18 ). Elytral sides more convergent towards distal apex ( Fig. 18a View FIGURES 18 )............. 18. lazica Janssens 1963 View in CoL
MZUR |
Museo di Zoologia dell'Universita "La Sapienza" |
HER |
Felix d'Herelle Reference Center for Bacterial Viruses |
PMSL |
Slovenian Museum of Natural History (Prirodosloveni Muzej Slovenije) |
IM |
Indian Museum |
MHNL |
Musee Guimet d'Histoire Naturelle de Lyon |
NMW |
Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien |
ZSM |
Bavarian State Collection of Zoology |
GE |
Università di Genova |
MSNG |
Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Genova 'Giacomo Doria' |
MNCN |
Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales |
HNHM |
Hungarian Natural History Museum (Termeszettudomanyi Muzeum) |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Hydraena rosannae Audisio, Trizzino & De Biase 2009
Trizzino, Marco, Carnevali, Lucilla, Felici, Stefano De & Audisio, Paolo 2013 |
Hydraena rosannae
Audisio, P. & Trizzino, M. & De Biase, A. & Mancini, E. & Antonini, G. 2009: 283 |
Hydraena (Haenydra) jaroslavae
Jach, M. A. 2004: 107 |
Hydraena (Haenydra) zezerensis Díaz Pazos & Bilton 1995: 137
Diaz Pazos, J. A. & Bilton, D. T. 1995: 137 |
Hydraena (Haenydra) catalonica
Fresneda, J. & Aguilera, P. & Hernando, C. 1994: 81 |
Hydraena (Haenydra) manfredjaechi
Delgado, J. A. & Soler, A. G. 1991: 217 |
Hydraena (Haenydra) gaditana
Lagar, A. & Fresneda, J. 1990: 158 |
Hydraena (Haenydra) heterogyna ssp. binaghii Jäch 1989: 190
Jach, M. A. 1989: 190 |
Hydraena (Haenydra) monstruosipes
Ferro, G. 1986: 137 |
Hydraena (Haenydra) csikii Endrödy-Younga 1967: 24
Audisio, P. & De Biase, A. & Jach, M. A. 1996: 79 |
Lohse, G. A. 1971: 101 |
Hydraena (Haenydra) tyrolensis
Jach, M. A. 1989: 190 |
Janssens, E. A. 1967: 1 |
Hydraena (Haenydra) sappho
Janssens, E. 1965: 104 |
Hydraena (Haenydra) bononiensis
Binaghi, G. 1960: 29 |
Hydraena (Haenydra) solarii var. bononiensis
Chiesa, A. 1959: 61 |
Hydraena (Haenydra) devincta d’Orchymont 1940: 131
d'Orchymont, A. 1940: 131 |
Hydraena (Haenydra) bitruncata d’Orchymont 1934b: 11
d'Orchymont, A. 1934: 11 |
Hydraena (Haenydra) muelleri
Pretner, E. 1931: 107 |
Hydraena (Haenydra) discreta
Pretner, E. 1931: 78 |
Hydraena (Haenydra) solarii
Pretner, E. 1930: 178 |
Hydraena (Haenydra) solarii
Binaghi, G. 1960: 31 |
Binaghi, G. 1958: 73 |
d'Orchymont, A. 1935: 4 |
Pretner, E. 1930: 178 |
Hydraena (Haenydra) truncata ssp. falzonii
Pretner, E. 1930: 181 |
Hydraena (Haenydra) cavernicola
Pretner, E. 1931: 113 |
Jeannel, R. 1920: 14 |
Hydraena (Haenydra) leonhardi
Breit, J. 1916: 56 |
Hydraena (Haenydra) czernohorskyi J. Müller 1911: 60
Muller, G. 1911: 60 |
Hydraena (Haenydra) bosnica
Apfelbeck, V. 1909: 497 |
Hydraena italica var. portai
d'Orchymont, A. 1934: 162 |
Knisch, A. 1924: 48 |
Fiori, A. 1904: 251 |
Hydraena italica var. ganglbaueri
d'Orchymont, A. 1934: 162 |
Knisch, A. 1924: 48 |
Fiori, A. 1904: 251 |
Hydraena (Haenydra) italica ssp. discreta
Ganglbauer, L. 1904: 210 |
Hydraena italica
Fiori, A. 1904: 250 |
Hydraena (Haenydra) devillei
Ganglbauer, L. 1901: 324 |
Hydraena (Haenydra) bensae
Ganglbauer, L. 1901: 330 |
Hydraena (Haenydra) bicuspidata
Ganglbauer, L. 1901: 330 |
Hydraena (Haenydra) italica
Fiori, A. 1904: 248 |
Ganglbauer, L. 1901: 328 |
Hydraena (Haenydra) italica var. bidentata
d'Orchymont, A. 1934: 162 |
Fiori, A. 1904: 251 |
Ganglbauer, L. 1901: 329 |
Hydraena (Haenydra) italica var. doderoi
Fiori, A. 1904: 251 |
Ganglbauer, L. 1901: 329 |
Hydraena (Haenydra) italica var. procera
Chiesa, A. 1958: 99 |
Ganglbauer, L. 1901: 330 |
Hydraena (Haenydra) monticola
Pretner, E. 1931: 79 |
Ganglbauer, L. 1901: 328 |
Rey, C. 1886: 30 |
Hydraena heterogyna
Bedel, L. 1898: 292 |
Hydraena (Haenydra) plumipes
Rey, C. 1886: 99 |
Hydraena (Haenydra) truncata
Rey, C. 1885: 31 |
Hydraena evanescens
Rey, C. 1884: 270 |
Hydraena (Haenydra) hungarica
Rey, C. 1884: 270 |
Hydraena producta
Mulsant, M. E. & Rey, C. 1852: 299 |
Hydraena lapidicola
Kiesenwetter, H. 1849: 183 |
Hydraena lapidicola
Chiesa, A. 1959: 55 |
Chiesa, A. 1958: 99 |
Kiesenwetter, H. 1849: 183 |
Hydraena polita
Kiesenwetter, H. 1849: 178 |
Hydraena dentipes
Germar, E. F. 1824: 22 |