Careproctus canusocius, Orr, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1643/CI2020089 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EF8791-FFE9-FFB8-9926-FBF42083AADF |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Careproctus canusocius |
status |
sp. nov. |
Careproctus canusocius , new species urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:DA17C3F2-1215-40C8-9CA8-2AC1A5ABB6BC
Transboundary Snailfish
Figures 1–3 View FIG View FIG View FIG , Table 1
Holotype.— UAM 47901 View Materials , 81.0 mm, Beaufort Sea, 70.41518N, 140.35608W, 488 m depth, L. Edenfield, 24 August 2013. GoogleMaps
Paratype.— UAM 47917 View Materials , 60.1 mm, female, Beaufort Sea, 70.56328N, 140.45018W, 599 m depth, L. Edenfield, 24 August 2013 GoogleMaps .
Diagnosis.— Careproctus canusocius is distinguished from all known species of Careproctus by elongate filamentous rays in the middle part of the pectoral fin that are about 50% free from the membrane. Among other liparids of the Arctic and North Pacific Oceans, the new species is most similar to C. mica , which is also a slender species with an unlobed dorsal fin and protruding snout, but from which it can be further distinguished on the basis of its higher counts of vertebrae (64–65 vs. 62 in C. mica ), counts of dorsal-fin rays (58–60 vs. 57), and stomach color (pale vs. dark gray-green), as well as pelvic disk length shorter than orbit length (vs. longer), and anus closer to the pelvic disk (2.1–2.3 % vs. 2.8 %) and closer to anal-fin origin (8.3–12.1 % vs. 15.4 %).
Description.— Body slender, tapering posteriorly to slender tail, moderately compressed, depth at dorsal-fin origin 77.7 (72.8) % HL. Head moderately large, moderately depressed, slightly swollen nape, dorsal profile gradually sloping from nape to snout. Snout rounded, projecting beyond upper jaw. Mouth inferior, moderate in size, maxilla 52.6 (42.6) % HL, extending to mid-orbit, oral cleft extending anterior to orbit. Premaxillary tooth plates matching mandibular tooth plates. Premaxillary and mandibular teeth simple in 17 widely spaced oblique rows, increasing from five teeth in anteromedial rows to seven teeth in more posterior rows. Small diastema at symphysis of upper and lower jaws. Orbit large, 33.1 (31.6) % HL, dorsal margin slightly below dorsal contour of head, suborbital depth to oral cleft 43.1 (55.8) % OL; pupil large, round. Bony interorbital width narrow, 22.9 (19.9) % HL; fleshy interorbital space broad, 48.6 (35.3) % HL, slightly convex. Snout length longer than orbit length, 37.7 (33.8) % HL. Nostril single, with base of tube level with middle of orbit; nostril tube length 1.7 (1.5) % HL.
Pores of cephalic lateralis system of moderate size: nasal pores two, maxillary pores six, preoperculomandibular pores seven, suprabranchial pores one (pore pattern 2-6-7-1); chin pores paired in separate pits. Interorbital pore absent. Free neuromasts ( Andriashev and Stein, 1998) about 5 or 6, small and difficult to discern, extending from above gill slit and to above a level with the anus on the mid-body.
Gill opening small, 24.0 (22.1) % HL, upper margin at level of midorbit, ventral margin just above pectoral fin. Opercular flap rounded. Branchiostegal rays six.
Dorsal-fin rays 58 (60), anterior rays slightly longer than posterior; anterior 5 (4) rays uniserial, apparently unsegmented; all rays simple (unbranched). Predorsal present or absent, when present inserted between neural spines two and three, anteriormost dorsal-fin pterygiophore inserted between neural spines three and four, bearing a single ray.
Anal-fin rays 52 (54), all rays biserial and segmented; all rays simple. One anal-fin pterygiophore anterior to first haemal spine bearing a single ray. Anal-fin origin below vertebrae 12–13 (caudal vertebrae 2–3).
Pectoral fin strongly notched, with 28 (27) rays. Upper lobe of 20 rays extending to anal-fin ray three, rays 3–5 longest, more ventral rays gradually shortening to shortest ray of notch. Lower lobe long, slightly shorter than upper lobe (ca. 95% of upper lobe length), with 8 (7) rays, extending well past anus, about half the distance to anal-fin origin; dorsal rays gradually lengthening to long thin rays 3–4, ventral rays gradually shortening to ventralmost ray near pectoral symphysis. Tips of dorsalmost 16 rays 5–7 % free of membrane, tips of rays 17 to 28 (27) 30–50 % free of membrane; ventral rays of dorsal lobe, notch, and lower lobe most strongly exserted. Three to five rays in notch more widely spaced than rays of lobes. Uppermost pectoral-fin ray level with cleft or ventral rim of orbit. Lowermost pectoral-fin ray below anterior part of orbit. Proximal pectoral radials three (2 þ 1), small: all radials round, unnotched; ventralmost radial three widely spaced from radial two ( Fig. 2 View FIG ). Scapular fenestra small, other fenestrae absent. Scapula with strong helve; coracoid triangular with broad lamina. Distal radials present at base of pectoral-fin rays 2 to 23, more ventral distal radials reduced, absent from base of ventralmost five rays, which articulate with non-staining fibrocartilage.
Pelvic disk smaller than orbit, 84.5 (81.4) % OL, 28.0 (25.7) % HL, flat, slightly longer than wide, anterior lobe strongly developed. Anus closer to pelvic disk than to anal-fin origin.
Principal caudal-fin rays 10, dorsal procurrent rays 1, ventral procurrent rays 1 (0). Membrane of posterior dorsal- and anal-fin rays attached to caudal fin 16.9 (16.7) % CL; caudal fin depth 9.0 (13.3) % CL.
Vertebrae 64 (65), 10 precaudal, 54 (55) caudal. Pleural ribs 2 (1), when present on vertebrae 8–9, long and thin. Body naked, with thin skin over gelatinous layer.
The largest specimen examined was the holotype of 81.0 mm ( UAM 47901 View Materials , sex not determined). The paratype is a 60.1 mm female with small white eggs ( UAM 47917 View Materials ) .
Coloration in preservation.— Body pale, faintly speckled ( Fig. 1 View FIG ), slightly darker posteriorly in holotype, more so in paratype. All fin membranes unpigmented. Peritoneum, orobranchial cavity, stomach, intestines, pyloric caeca, and urogenital papilla pale.
Distribution.— Careproctus canusocius has been collected only in the Beaufort Sea within the U.S. / Canada transborder area at 70.41518N, 140.3568W and 70.56328N, 140.4508W at depths of 488–599 m ( Fig. 3 View FIG ).
Etymology.— The specific epithet canusocius , to be treated as a noun in apposition, is a combination of ‘‘canus,’’ an amalgamation of the abbreviated names of Canada and the United States, with the Latin word ‘‘socius’’ meaning ‘‘ally.’’ The name alludes to the collections of the types during a collaborative cruise conducted by the United States and Canada in the Beaufort Sea Transboundary Region. The region is claimed by both the United States and Canada, who have remained historic allies in the face of global challenges.
Comparisons.— Among species of Careproctus , C. reinhardti and C. lerikimae are the only species previously recorded from the Beaufort Sea ( Orr et al., 2015, 2019; Mecklenburg et al., 2018). Careproctus canusocius is easily distinguished from both by its slender body, protruding snout, and elongate middle pectoral-fin rays. Among similar species known from the Arctic ( Chernova, 2015), C. canusocius is most similar to C. mica from the Kara Sea but differs from it in having elongate filamentous rays in the middle part of the pectoral fin, more vertebrae (64–65 vs. 62 in C. mica ), more dorsal-fin rays (58–60 vs. 57), and a pale (vs. dark gray-green) stomach, as well as in several morphometric characters. Careproctus canusocius is distinguished from most other species of the Arctic by its protruding snout and high counts of vertebrae and medial fin rays. Those species with similar high counts of vertebrae ( Chernova, 2015) include C. kidoi (62 vertebrae), C. knipowitschi (63), C. latiosus (59–60), C. macrophthalmus (59– 62), and C. moskalevi (59–62). Careproctus moskalevi is the most similar among these species, but C. canusocius differs from it, as well as from C. latiosus , in having a protruding snout, higher median fin ray and vertebral counts, and a pale body and peritoneum.
The two specimens of C. canusocius were collected at depths of about 500– 600 m. This is deeper than the recorded depth of the holotype and only known specimen of C. mica at 204 m ( Chernova, 2015) and much shallower than the collection depths of the deep-water species C. moskalevi at 1,589 – 1,579 m and C. latiosus at 1,478 –1,540 m ( Andriashev and Chernova, 2011).
The pectoral girdle in C. canusocius is similar to those of species within the clade Melanura of Orr et al. (2019) in having three radials, the two dorsal being widely separated from the ventral, and a small scapular fenestra. In the Orr et al. (2019) molecular analysis, the Arctic species C. micropus and C. kidoi formed a clade with the subarctic North Pacific species C. simus . Careproctus simus shares the similar overall morphology of a long slender body, protruding snout, and large eyes. However, C. canusocius has higher counts of vertebrae (64–65 vs. 59–64 in C. simus ) and median fin rays (dorsal: 58–60 vs. 54–60 and anal: 52–54 vs. 47–53) and fewer pectoral-fin rays (27–30 vs. 31–37).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.