Rubus coreanus var. nakaianus Léveillé (1910: 358)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.559.1.2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7009293 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EF287E-FFDC-FFC8-A9D5-8C4EFD35FD29 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rubus coreanus var. nakaianus Léveillé (1910: 358) |
status |
|
5. Rubus coreanus var. nakaianus Léveillé (1910: 358) View in CoL
Type (lectotype designated here):— KOREA. Quelpaert : in silvis Hallaisan, June 1909, T. Taquet 2845 (barcode E00313541!). [Image available at https://data.rbge.org.uk/herb/ E00313541] .
Note:— Léveillé (1910) cited three collections (Taquet 2834, 2835 & 2845)” in the protologue when he described this variety, but did not indicate the holotype specimen. In addition, no author has designated a lectotype, even inadvertently (Art. 7.11 of ICN). According to Stafleu and Cowan (1979), all of the Léveillé’ type specimens have been purchased by E in 1919. We locate three collections, one of them “ Taquet 2834 ” deposited in E (barcode 00010578), one of them “ Taquet 2835 ” in E (barcode 00313542), and the other material “ Taquet 2845 ” in E (barcode E00313541); all these collections should be regarded as syntypes (Art. 9.6 of ICN). All the specimens in E bear the information “ Syntype Rubus coreanus var. nakaianus H. Léveillé ”, and it is necessary to select one of them as the lectotype (Art. 9.12 of ICN). Hence, we designate the blooming specimen of “ T. Taquet 2845 ” in E (barcode E00313541) as the lectotype. The selected sheet bear the same locality and is morphological complete with the presence of stem, leaves, and flower that fully correspond with the protologue .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |