Rubus viburnifolius Franchet (1895: 63)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.559.1.2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7009344 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EF287E-FFD6-FFC2-A9D5-8FD0FB00FBFB |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rubus viburnifolius Franchet (1895: 63) |
status |
|
28. Rubus viburnifolius Franchet (1895: 63) View in CoL
Type (lectotype designated here):— CHINA. Yunnan: in silvis circa Tchen-fong-chan, Delavay s.n. (barcode P00746144!, isolectotype: P00746145!). [Image available at http://coldb.mnhn.fr/catalognumber/mnhn/p/ p00746144] .
Note:— Franchet (1895) provided the following locality information: Yunnan: “in silvis circa Tchen-fong-chan (Delavay s.n.)” as the type in the protologue.According to Stafleu and Cowan (1976), Franchet worked at P, and Delavay’s specimens were deposited in K, P and PC. We locate two duplicate specimens of “ Delavay s.n. ”, deposited in P (barcode 00746144 & 00746145) and all the specimens have Delavay’s annotation and are well preserved. All the specimens of P bear the same locality information and it is necessary to select one of them as the lectotype (Art. 9.12 of ICN). We designate the blooming specimen “ Delavay s.n. ” in P (barcode 00746144) as the lectotype. The selected sheet bears the same locality and well preserved specimen that fully correspond with the protologue.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |